Subject: bug#21934: 24.5; find-tag: reading TAGS file incorrectly

From: Andreas Matthias <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 19:52:54 +0100

Dmitry Gutov wrote:

> On 11/22/2015 08:27 PM, Andreas Matthias wrote:
>
>> E.g.: foo:bar.baz
>>
>> A class `foo' with a table `bar' containing an element called `baz'
>
> So, "foo:bar" is a valid notation, even when it's not a function call, and even
> when 'bar' is not a function? Is it any different from "foo.bar" then?

You are right, that was nonsense. The : must be the last operator
because it inserts the `self' or `this' element into the following
function call.