GNU bug report logs - #21894
escape continuation doc wrong about reinvokability

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 21894 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 21894 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Zefram <zefram <at> fysh.org>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: escape continuation doc wrong about reinvokability
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 23:27:42 +0000

The manual says

#                  Escape continuations are delimited continuations whose
# only use is to make a non-local exit--i.e., to escape from the current
# continuation.  Such continuations are invoked only once, and for this
# reason they are sometimes called "one-shot continuations".

O RLY?

scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (ice-9 control))
scheme@(guile-user)> (define cc #f)
scheme@(guile-user)> (list 'a (let/ec e (list 'b (e (call-with-current-continuation (lambda (c) (set! cc c) 0))))))
$1 = (a 0)
scheme@(guile-user)> (cc 1)
$2 = (a 1)
scheme@(guile-user)> (cc 2)
$3 = (a 2)

Clearly I have invoked this escape continuation, successfully, more
than once.  The semantics here are perfectly sensible, it's just
the documentation that's off the mark, because it ignores how escape
continuations interact with other kinds of continuation.  I suggest
changing "Such continuations are invoked only once" sentence to something
like

    Such continuations can only be invoked from within the dynamic
    extent of the call to which they will jump.  Because the jump
    ends that extent, if escape continuations are the only kind of
    continuations being used it is only possible to invoke an escape
    continuation at most once.  For this reason they are sometimes
    called "one-shot continuations", but that is a misnomer when other
    kinds of continuations are also in use.  Most kinds can reinstate a
    dynamic extent that has been exited, and if the extent of an escape
    continuation is reinstated then it can be invoked again to exit that
    extent again.  Conversely, an escape continuation cannot be invoked
    from a separate thread that has its own dynamic state not including
    the continuation's extent, even if the continuation's extent is
    still in progress in its original thread and the continuation has
    never been invoked.

-zefram

Message #10 received at 21894-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: Zefram <zefram <at> fysh.org>
Cc: 21894-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21894: escape continuation doc wrong about reinvokability
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:20:59 +0200

On Fri 13 Nov 2015 00:27, Zefram <zefram <at> fysh.org> writes:

> #                  Escape continuations are delimited continuations whose
> # only use is to make a non-local exit--i.e., to escape from the current
> # continuation.  Such continuations are invoked only once, and for this
> # reason they are sometimes called "one-shot continuations".
>
> O RLY?

:)

I removed that last sentence.  By saying less it will be less possible
to enter into this kind of error :)

Thanks for the report,

Andy

BTW: You have submitted some really nice reports!  If you would like to
assign copyright to the FSF so that you can get patches into Guile, let
me know and I can send you the docs.  Cheers :)

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.