From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 12 10:30:06 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2015 15:30:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34882 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwtp3-0004JT-EG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:30:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54830) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwtoi-0004Ii-OC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:29:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwtoh-0005L4-Eu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:29:40 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:51556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwtoh-0005L0-Bi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:29:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36591) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwtoc-0001rR-N7 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:29:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwtob-0005KH-MC for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:29:34 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]:37476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zwtob-0005KD-Ft for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:29:33 -0500 Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so93458803wmw.0 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:29:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=letWYKqsb7ZO5fAgumbiaG3iwzhL3Xxf+ImSVzKA4sw=; b=v7TvKH6t0Yx8y09ubh9Wer5GM3WO7o+WQa0lnAQAeERz4OAE0WGoiKSrFWrOICWvYG f1qlol/j1voHZb+9cb6xMo23RFYNxaOmtBWYD9HXY5fahONZWdJWRWRwVtKx27nq8hJd hQVyb0272PV13+Hhqct5wjWnufdy4a07dYTtK3N21/f1oIAu3aZrA4Wm78SR5doN1RjA PiiROuIYrnMlPlr4Raq39o3uuIi8OhJ9rQfaweR46m1a5fUWKQFkz8fGDXqnZItRMTTg LPz6lEevV3rWy+knAcETuCiSnSRu8TA/DDm6SdC3sz88NzrEThDiBlUYig2q7OxRWlPD BCrg== X-Received: by 10.194.201.202 with SMTP id kc10mr19628294wjc.84.1447342172188; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:29:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from T420.taylan ([2a02:908:c32:4740:221:ccff:fe66:68f0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 71sm15562884wmt.15.2015.11.12.07.29.30 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:29:31 -0800 (PST) From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=) To: bug-guile@gnu.org Subject: 'monitor' form broken Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:29:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87vb97s0bp.fsf@T420.taylan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) It seems that the 'monitor' form is currently a no-op. The form (par-for-each (lambda (x) (monitor (foo))) xs) should be functionally equivalent to (let ((mutex (make-mutex))) (par-for-each (lambda (x) (with-mutex mutex (foo))) xs)) but currently becomes (par-for-each (lambda (x) (let ((mutex (make-mutex))) (with-mutex mutex (foo)))) xs) which is ineffective. I don't know what's the best way to fix this. The simplest thing that comes to my mind is something along the lines of: (define-syntax monitor (lambda (stx) (syntax-case stx () ((_ body body* ...) (let ((uuid (generate-uuid))) #`(with-mutex (mutex-with-uuid #,uuid) body body* ...)))))) where mutex-with-uuid looks it up from a hash table at run-time and instantiates it when it doesn't exist, this operation also being synchronized across threads, like: (define mutex-table (make-hash-table)) (define mutex-table-mutex (make-mutex)) (define (mutex-with-uuid uuid) (with-mutex mutex-table-mutex (or (hash-ref mutex-table uuid) (let ((mutex (make-mutex))) (hash-set! mutex-table uuid mutex) mutex)))) If that looks OK, I can try to make a proper patch from it. I'm not sure what I'd use in place of `generate-uuid' though. Would `gensym' be good enough? Shameless advertisement: with SRFI-126, the (or (hash-ref ...) ...) bit would have been just: (hashtable-intern! mutex-table uuid make-mutex) It's borrowed from MIT/GNU Scheme. Seems pretty useful. Taylan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 24 12:04:17 2016 Received: (at 21887) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2016 16:04:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54526 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGTab-000772-9t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:04:17 -0400 Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:61199 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGTaZ-00076r-ID for 21887@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:04:15 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9981F7BC; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:04:14 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=oxhTcTekIoe3 L5FrMY0s+TEdCYY=; b=eAwWCMqNpKvrxmwTCNnLb6S323sG2N8UAUNsNBi77Wjt ihNIVER/EekiVUHpNAz+jLNrx//gbOcPkQE07YTe5KWmY8gPYxpLoPVBaEATdZZj WT4u0LR9d3FCpnFu8jLqZcSRQi//iSNyk7A9bYF5Vwi2arCnEyW15ktg7nX9a00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=OnamtM R/yqrXAT2f8wgRoFjvVn7ukBuLeb3BC4T8lZedEgWgVWO8WHaT7xrQy7sn+JSfpO jG+x/438XYQD3t2aE4OrgT23wzymbfrvjNZVCbH2mBD05cLRVacL8Mr2jyJKCykl Br7VNwPv8quD9idFQ+IJbCaRo6AoekbrAxP8M= Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E44E1F7BB; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:04:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39BFD1F7B9; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:04:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo To: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer=22?=) Subject: Re: bug#21887: 'monitor' form broken References: <87vb97s0bp.fsf@T420.taylan> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:04:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87vb97s0bp.fsf@T420.taylan> ("Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=5C=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1=2FKammer=5C=22=22's?= message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:29:30 +0100") Message-ID: <87inwyefpl.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4B588E04-3A25-11E6-B689-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21887 Cc: 21887@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Hi Taylan, On Thu 12 Nov 2015 16:29, taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1= rl=C4=B1/Kammer") writes: > It seems that the 'monitor' form is currently a no-op. The form > > (par-for-each (lambda (x) > (monitor > (foo))) > xs) > > should be functionally equivalent to > > (let ((mutex (make-mutex))) > (par-for-each (lambda (x) > (with-mutex mutex > (foo))) > xs)) > > but currently becomes > > (par-for-each (lambda (x) > (let ((mutex (make-mutex))) > (with-mutex mutex > (foo)))) > xs) > > which is ineffective. > > I don't know what's the best way to fix this. The simplest thing that > comes to my mind is something along the lines of: > > (define-syntax monitor > (lambda (stx) > (syntax-case stx () > ((_ body body* ...) > (let ((uuid (generate-uuid))) > #`(with-mutex (mutex-with-uuid #,uuid) > body body* ...)))))) > > where mutex-with-uuid looks it up from a hash table at run-time and > instantiates it when it doesn't exist, this operation also being > synchronized across threads, like: > > (define mutex-table (make-hash-table)) > > (define mutex-table-mutex (make-mutex)) > > (define (mutex-with-uuid uuid) > (with-mutex mutex-table-mutex > (or (hash-ref mutex-table uuid) > (let ((mutex (make-mutex))) > (hash-set! mutex-table uuid mutex) > mutex)))) > > If that looks OK, I can try to make a proper patch from it. I'm not > sure what I'd use in place of `generate-uuid' though. Would `gensym' be > good enough? You're totally right on all points. Please do prepare a patch :) I wish we could do something faster for the "embedded" mutex but correctness should come first. Cheers, Andy From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 25 10:51:35 2016 Received: (at 21887) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2016 14:51:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55612 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGovn-0005wr-JZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:51:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:35667) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGovl-0005wf-Vd for 21887@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:51:34 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id a66so12781931wme.2 for <21887@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 07:51:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=qJ2RVOOTRZ5gDH1Q6MGixwWyzkNX7ZChsr2n0kx32Ms=; b=cmjaCwg7j7a2T0f7IWpV58FWsWTsxHHJKXDE+oXI/gyMm6GsZTvFZjpmu/VHC2bhE7 9U41KupzsDos5XJZxMbJm/bYKnL06idaAwo51oFWS2lUZAMb7LuCEL1aoa/9OsQIhrzx 2K2sQrAvADq770z3mpkeoM/7LUhxwK8lZqsYjZVqz4GB6cCcc5FaJmk6mdaI+81WbVH8 Br8AiTaQhDArLVsFp+tPzfYVEUo9e5R9Fkv9vRDgpp6XKgE8c0P0Ltci6xwxHXRBImww V04ch9G1WBEHljrhmbB6QXayymGBo8R/YiMae1lapYkeNwkSkukzlTloEMcfXqkqh/4d 2blg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=qJ2RVOOTRZ5gDH1Q6MGixwWyzkNX7ZChsr2n0kx32Ms=; b=QosNFq/RV4EYak0N9HfflVJWDbdjVKR+7DbadOqLUsXt1QQSe/g7EHXdhcjkQGMzm9 e5nVu5G5qdnu6D8fX4p3NPTLLtiWvL98s8pepsas14oj9J+VD5zdCLbWeRlJmLvqckti 4zioXAh6uJ9Ta0lfjICXc07kwqMWBioWYldGBmJWJPEyns2GveFINPsdocT2qIrkwc2F NipkOW3cYqHjo+legzZQNvWFgYyVnBaP/tmC6Nh5HzHsbK5KylBM5NUhPrYSwWjy+eC1 dVNd6J0Ztl8qY2dNVvseTBhPNo/5PH2oJGCDO/Or9ulSPDTaHEaI1fP7KF1/4IQkP0Sf XoQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLWYYrwh/evLlgLLJd9Z/LnjVHZPM2D0eiy4FF9z7iVtiXQQgk+QlTFWLTmp5P4NA== X-Received: by 10.28.29.146 with SMTP id d140mr3174767wmd.27.1466866288329; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 07:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from T420.taylan ([2a02:908:c30:3540:221:ccff:fe66:68f0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k6sm10317270wjz.28.2016.06.25.07.51.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Jun 2016 07:51:27 -0700 (PDT) From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=) To: Andy Wingo Subject: Re: bug#21887: 'monitor' form broken References: <87vb97s0bp.fsf@T420.taylan> <87inwyefpl.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 16:51:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87inwyefpl.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:04:06 +0200") Message-ID: <87wpldgw41.fsf@T420.taylan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21887 Cc: 21887@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Here's a patch, tested minimally by running (par-for-each (lambda (x) (monitor (sleep 1) (display "foo\n"))) (iota 10)) on a quad-core. Previously it would print the "foo"s in groups of four with a second between each group; now it prints them one by one with a second between each, as should be. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-diff Content-Disposition: inline; filename=0001-Fix-monitor-macro.patch >From 08c7f4cd98c86fbb6551c7c0b6f17262c67e7b23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?= Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 16:43:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix 'monitor' macro. * module/ice-9/threads.scm (monitor-mutex-table) (monitor-mutex-table-mutex, monitor-mutex-with-id): New variables. (monitor): Fix it. --- module/ice-9/threads.scm | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/module/ice-9/threads.scm b/module/ice-9/threads.scm index 9f9e1bf..14da113 100644 --- a/module/ice-9/threads.scm +++ b/module/ice-9/threads.scm @@ -85,9 +85,24 @@ (lambda () (begin e0 e1 ...)) (lambda () (unlock-mutex x))))) -(define-syntax-rule (monitor first rest ...) - (with-mutex (make-mutex) - first rest ...)) +(define monitor-mutex-table (make-hash-table)) + +(define monitor-mutex-table-mutex (make-mutex)) + +(define (monitor-mutex-with-id id) + (with-mutex monitor-mutex-table-mutex + (or (hashq-ref monitor-mutex-table id) + (let ((mutex (make-mutex))) + (hashq-set! monitor-mutex-table id mutex) + mutex)))) + +(define-syntax monitor + (lambda (stx) + (syntax-case stx () + ((_ body body* ...) + (let ((id (datum->syntax #'body (gensym)))) + #`(with-mutex (monitor-mutex-with-id '#,id) + body body* ...)))))) (define (par-mapper mapper cons) (lambda (proc . lists) -- 2.8.4 --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 27 03:33:29 2016 Received: (at 21887) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2016 07:33:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57403 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHR2u-0007X5-SC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:33:29 -0400 Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:63254 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHR2t-0007Wx-Uf for 21887@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:33:28 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587C220108; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:33:25 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=iB6gT0atW8V1 V+apvYW1R1zmWfA=; b=VGvA2fMxXB1fLLGxzrhDPMAx7bXW9uxbciKXbX94i1Kz nJrr/5PR+409+uolzqb60whTq7OLfO3bQmSwLqaqTkUjBJ6OtBiVfI7NqGGZtAuC dbJHxu02aU/LnmFKo0O/BzKpa6hn27CWp+b/eqQ3myVXXFJic8J38iC8nT09IOY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=FFINo5 rxTUY90hevE31jeliDYg2qjlOhww/Ht5+pAbz986378yC2cvqdwz/4298/kVVukX Nuf4YrBADSSqNa7b9BZMZfxrf1EEOJUTA6P7ddxoOUKuaCTH2Ji0GDtvixHHHzGj rSZeI/Fp1qON4sOU7qvkGBRez4cOjtrUKHwtI= Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EE020107; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:33:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7030A20106; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:33:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo To: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer=22?=) Subject: Re: bug#21887: 'monitor' form broken References: <87vb97s0bp.fsf@T420.taylan> <87inwyefpl.fsf@pobox.com> <87wpldgw41.fsf@T420.taylan> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:33:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wpldgw41.fsf@T420.taylan> ("Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=5C=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1=2FKammer=5C=22=22's?= message of "Sat, 25 Jun 2016 16:51:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87wplb9jcz.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6E95C362-3C39-11E6-86AC-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21887 Cc: 21887@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sat 25 Jun 2016 16:51, taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1= rl=C4=B1/Kammer") writes: > Here's a patch, tested minimally by running > > (par-for-each (lambda (x) > (monitor > (sleep 1) > (display "foo\n"))) > (iota 10)) > > on a quad-core. Previously it would print the "foo"s in groups of four > with a second between each group; now it prints them one by one with a > second between each, as should be. Applied, thanks! Andy From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 27 03:33:46 2016 Received: (at 21887-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2016 07:33:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57406 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHR3C-0007Xg-47 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:33:46 -0400 Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:63682 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHR3A-0007XZ-WA for 21887-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:33:45 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11DA2010B for <21887-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:33:44 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=SSLmt0XI2dI3P81icIi2xl/Ofxw=; b=DKn5V6 9PPnGKd3xNboxnUyXg2MWxSlERakZRPt1lPf0nuPFoKtOElc5Fb8QGJ7fUo6OKr4 SVAAxoZfkHIy2eDR1VLXXs9QbJXpMFvMa6J5NCg231mapmfut7uFDJN9O7P1sFd0 rIIO3KkS94s+Qg/wNgAsW35muPaxoeAaCcL5c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qO4S052H8L8zyKk0FaxiM7aIJF5J0Wed 6GxQKotVFZJ5DozQLYh+8dfQc3SXX+Ysg/n+hpT3VLhvBPmvgqLtS0YtLqnYbHjC tIGz/z0ikHWPSCxU9wq88tLB/BLlrkfc/EwVXyOpBO3mkpbHmqXWxMRuOUdX7Xsl KS/akf4shaQ= Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADBB2010A for <21887-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:33:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 201D020109 for <21887-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:33:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo To: 21887-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#21887: 'monitor' form broken References: <87vb97s0bp.fsf@T420.taylan> <87inwyefpl.fsf@pobox.com> <87wpldgw41.fsf@T420.taylan> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:33:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wpldgw41.fsf@T420.taylan> ("Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=5C=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1=2FKammer=5C=22=22's?= message of "Sat, 25 Jun 2016 16:51:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87shvz9jcf.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7A5084BC-3C39-11E6-8D6A-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21887-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) thanks From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:50:49 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator