GNU bug report logs - #21833
24.4; desktop-kill, which is interactive, is in kill-emacs-hook

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Michael Arntzenius <daekharel <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:09:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Merged with 28943

Found in versions 24.4, 25.2

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #62 received at 21833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 21833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rgm <at> gnu.org, si <at> siancu.net
Subject: Re: bug#21833: 24.4;
 desktop-kill, which is interactive, is in kill-emacs-hook
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:05:45 +0200
> From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:14:57 +0100
> Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>, 21833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, si <at> siancu.net
> 
> > In "emacs -Q", the desktop you have is ephemeral
> 
> Obviously, I'm not talking about the -Q case, and I don't thing the OP is,
> either. That's just a recipe to show that kill-emacs asks an interactive
> question.

That's not my interpretation of the original report.  It specifically
talks about "emacs -Q".

It also talks about the daemon.  If that's the problem, then I guess
desktop-kill could behave as if YES was answered when we run in daemon
mode and -Q was not given on the command line.  Would that make sense?

What other use cases are there where this issue could arise,
i.e. where the user couldn't answer the question?




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 9 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.