From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 04 11:23:32 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2015 16:23:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53523 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu0qR-0004sG-NS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:23:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59266) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu0q7-0004rm-67 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:23:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu0q3-0003Pf-9t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:23:10 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:59984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu0q3-0003Pb-7i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:23:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu0q2-0002p0-6j for bug-grep@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:23:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu0pz-0003Nr-1e for bug-grep@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:23:06 -0500 Received: from mx5-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.37]:55097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu0py-0003Nj-R2 for bug-grep@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:23:02 -0500 Received: from zmail14.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail14.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.16]) by mx5-phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tA4GN1uw017587 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:23:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:23:01 -0500 (EST) From: Jaroslav Skarvada To: bug-grep@gnu.org Message-ID: <707537450.2399373.1446654181154.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <980208114.2394809.1446653727340.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Subject: long-pattern-perf test failing on distribution buildsystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.40.204.52] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.6_GA_5922 (ZimbraWebClient - FF41 (Linux)/8.0.6_GA_5922) Thread-Topic: long-pattern-perf test failing on distribution buildsystem Thread-Index: Ko0Vz+ITpzgIQei19/ecY0mCp7gi3Q== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hi, I am observing build failures in Fedora build system (Koji) due to failing test 'long-pattern-perf' test. I think it's due to variable load on the builders, thus the time measurement of the run is not reliable. From one run I got: $base_ms = 20 $b10x_ms = 550 / 20 = 27 which triggers the failure. For now I disabled the test downstream and so far I haven't discovered any other problem thanks & regards Jaroslav From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 04 22:22:02 2015 Received: (at 21826-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2015 03:22:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53910 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuB7h-00014k-CR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:22:01 -0500 Received: from mail-yk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:35738) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuB7d-00014F-7C; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:21:57 -0500 Received: by ykek133 with SMTP id k133so110085031yke.2; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 19:21:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=qTyve0gV8IcIkh28tVAbX+ue53vg1NzLCyCQTTDX4Ko=; b=WG3kjQEnePQNG+2JH2w5PY55KeF10Qi/JFvpoRMTkIpKjvRR8kmKv9pkmcVBQgP1cJ ozoWw69YE3dgoqA72v9DKwzKcqW6Wnav0LbP/9x2Oj5VEbrESXfaL3Ql/sF5L4VIPzhL nP6PTwx5Ho+pKgkB23lwm6zb9UMajhMwaCxUlQxMoUHlDlz24QuNewnk9RK7Vqvw4Aq0 sdGmnlluBbFNYqyulcDHM86s3JPtZN9GXGh+qXozgKcfdZpkmKgKmla6fgNQudyiNV1Q 9Rw4NG54rAPd20GLcosFYmx1P/7QYClwgpB2R1OrQ5/jmSYTvhtEuTfA+SMGi9wkvnmj 1g3w== X-Received: by 10.31.14.7 with SMTP id 7mr5049210vko.133.1446693716549; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 19:21:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.65.18 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 19:21:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <707537450.2399373.1446654181154.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <980208114.2394809.1446653727340.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <707537450.2399373.1446654181154.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> From: Jim Meyering Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 19:21:36 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Gx347fNoUElOoLjvRcLuWkEGjrI Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#21826: long-pattern-perf test failing on distribution buildsystem To: Jaroslav Skarvada , Andreas Schwab Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001a1145514612f9fd0523c2a14f X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21826-done Cc: 21812-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 21826-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --001a1145514612f9fd0523c2a14f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > Hi, > > I am observing build failures in Fedora build system (Koji) due to > failing test 'long-pattern-perf' test. I think it's due to variable > load on the builders, thus the time measurement of the run is not > reliable. From one run I got: > > $base_ms = 20 > $b10x_ms = 550 / 20 = 27 > > which triggers the failure. For now I disabled the test downstream > and so far I haven't discovered any other problem Thanks to you and Andreas for the reports. I have pushed the attached to make these rare failures less likely to cause trouble: --001a1145514612f9fd0523c2a14f Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=US-ASCII; name="0001-tests-mark-performance-related-tests-as-expensive.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-tests-mark-performance-related-tests-as-expensive.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_iglo1xhr0 RnJvbSBlOTM4ZDIyZTIxMzE5NzJhNmU5ZWFkZGJmODUwYzZhMDRhNGY3NTBjIE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBKaW0gTWV5ZXJpbmcgPG1leWVyaW5nQGZiLmNvbT4KRGF0ZTog V2VkLCA0IE5vdiAyMDE1IDEwOjU3OjA3IC0wODAwClN1YmplY3Q6IFtQQVRDSF0gdGVzdHM6IG1h cmsgcGVyZm9ybWFuY2UtcmVsYXRlZCB0ZXN0cyBhcyBleHBlbnNpdmUKClRoZXNlIHBlcmZvcm1h bmNlLXJlbGF0ZWQgdGVzdHMgYXJlIHNsaWdodGx5IGZhaWx1cmUgcHJvbmUgZHVlIHRvCnZhcnlp bmcgc3lzdGVtIGxvYWQgZHVyaW5nIHRoZSB0d28gcnVucy4KTWFya2luZyB0aGVzZSB0ZXN0cyBh cyAiZXhwZW5zaXZlIiBtYWtlcyBpdCBzbyB0aGV5IGFyZSBubyBsb25nZXIgcnVuCnZpYSAibWFr ZSBjaGVjayIuIFlvdSBjYW4gc3RpbGwgcnVuIHRoZW0gdmlhIG1ha2UgImNoZWNrLWV4cGVuc2l2 ZSIuClRoaXMgbWFrZXMgdGhlbSBsZXNzIGxpa2VseSB0byBiZSBydW4gYnkgcmVndWxhciB1c2Vy cy4KKiB0ZXN0cy9sb25nLXBhdHRlcm4tcGVyZjogVXNlIGV4cGVuc2l2ZV8uCiogdGVzdHMvbWIt bm9uLVVURjgtcGVyZm9ybWFuY2U6IExpa2V3aXNlLgpSZXBvcnRlZCBieSBKYXJvc2xhdiBTa2Fy dmFkYSBpbiBodHRwOi8vZGViYnVncy5nbnUub3JnLzIxODI2CmFuZCBieSBBbmRyZWFzIFNjaHdh YiBpbiBodHRwOi8vZGViYnVncy5nbnUub3JnLzIxODEyLgotLS0KIHRlc3RzL2xvbmctcGF0dGVy bi1wZXJmICAgICAgIHwgNSArKysrKwogdGVzdHMvbWItbm9uLVVURjgtcGVyZm9ybWFuY2UgfCA1 ICsrKysrCiAyIGZpbGVzIGNoYW5nZWQsIDEwIGluc2VydGlvbnMoKykKCmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS90 ZXN0cy9sb25nLXBhdHRlcm4tcGVyZiBiL3Rlc3RzL2xvbmctcGF0dGVybi1wZXJmCmluZGV4IGMy MjJjMDIuLjJjOWQwODAgMTAwNzU1Ci0tLSBhL3Rlc3RzL2xvbmctcGF0dGVybi1wZXJmCisrKyBi L3Rlc3RzL2xvbmctcGF0dGVybi1wZXJmCkBAIC0yMCw2ICsyMCwxMSBAQAoKIGZhaWw9MAoKKyMg VGhpcyB0ZXN0IGlzIHN1c2NlcHRpYmxlIHRvIGZhaWx1cmUgZHVlIHRvIGRpZmZlcmVuY2VzIGlu CisjIHN5c3RlbSBsb2FkIGR1cmluZyB0aGUgdHdvIHRlc3QgcnVucywgc28gd2UnbGwgbWFyayBp dCBhcworIyAiZXhwZW5zaXZlIiwgbWFraW5nIGl0IGxlc3MgbGlrZWx5IHRvIGJlIHJ1biBieSBy ZWd1bGFyIHVzZXJzLgorZXhwZW5zaXZlXworCiBlY2hvIHggPiBpbiB8fCBmcmFtZXdvcmtfZmFp bHVyZV8KICMgV2UgY291bGQgdXNlIHNlcSAtcyAnJyAoYXZvaWRpbmcgdGhlIHRyIGZpbHRlciks IGJ1dCBJCiAjIHN1c3BlY3Qgc29tZSB2ZXJzaW9uIG9mIHNlcSBkb2VzIG5vdCBob25vciB0aGF0 IG9wdGlvbi4KZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL3Rlc3RzL21iLW5vbi1VVEY4LXBlcmZvcm1hbmNlIGIvdGVz dHMvbWItbm9uLVVURjgtcGVyZm9ybWFuY2UKaW5kZXggMjI4MzYxZC4uOWJkNWQzOSAxMDA3NTUK LS0tIGEvdGVzdHMvbWItbm9uLVVURjgtcGVyZm9ybWFuY2UKKysrIGIvdGVzdHMvbWItbm9uLVVU RjgtcGVyZm9ybWFuY2UKQEAgLTIyLDYgKzIyLDExIEBACgogZmFpbD0wCgorIyBUaGlzIHRlc3Qg aXMgc3VzY2VwdGlibGUgdG8gZmFpbHVyZSBkdWUgdG8gZGlmZmVyZW5jZXMgaW4KKyMgc3lzdGVt IGxvYWQgZHVyaW5nIHRoZSB0d28gdGVzdCBydW5zLCBzbyB3ZSdsbCBtYXJrIGl0IGFzCisjICJl eHBlbnNpdmUiLCBtYWtpbmcgaXQgbGVzcyBsaWtlbHkgdG8gYmUgcnVuIGJ5IHJlZ3VsYXIgdXNl cnMuCitleHBlbnNpdmVfCisKICMgTWFrZSB0aGlzIGxhcmdlIGVub3VnaCBzbyB0aGF0IGV2ZW4g b24gaGlnaC1lbmQgc3lzdGVtcwogIyBpdCBpbmN1cnMgYXQgbGVhc3QgNS0xMG1zIG9mIHVzZXIg dGltZS4KIHllcyAkKHByaW50ZiAnJTA3OGQnIDApIHwgaGVhZCAtNDAwMDAwID4gaW4gfHwgZnJh bWV3b3JrX2ZhaWx1cmVfCi0tIAoyLjYuMAoK --001a1145514612f9fd0523c2a14f-- From unknown Tue Aug 19 10:09:43 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator