From unknown Fri Aug 22 01:03:44 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#21821 <21821@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#21821 <21821@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 25.0.50; invalid byte code in dired-x.elc Reply-To: bug#21821 <21821@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:03:44 +0000 retitle 21821 25.0.50; invalid byte code in dired-x.elc reassign 21821 emacs submitter 21821 Daniel McClanahan severity 21821 normal tag 21821 notabug moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 03 12:54:03 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2015 17:54:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51719 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtfmU-0007HA-VR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:54:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46474) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtfmB-0007GK-At for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:54:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtfmA-0001sD-7y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:53:42 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtfmA-0001s9-4u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:53:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztfm9-0008UV-94 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:53:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztfm8-0001qu-Gc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:53:41 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]:35193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztfm8-0001qf-CQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:53:40 -0500 Received: by iofz202 with SMTP id z202so26947312iof.2 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:53:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=UeaJY1+lxTioHzW5/6WF7or/nbwcQUhmuTj0Wb8pMHE=; b=kxLSd67XZwVcbALe/8oGJGJsZ2H1pS5vS69NsrDVFrQCIDuDsElGMCo8HSGwMlI0hL BpnU2vS5LYfs47lFgmXHaay1ukeCpipAtjpRs3GjhoLqze/KdPs1ghhyqdCJjBvfE1Hh T+MD8fChofji6JdkEYMQHVdthE5tblCofj+lKn5Wz2upLSXjfHs8o8IAVteqB1BaT+lS 51k/mlHZLRDXXTgMGTvDF5IK18ijysugQyjPMeQytn68jBGg29fLBSfXYk5wypEsEoNu 3uWzJuOn7Mz8F79TTtMxaWyesLtzHzf8mKSy5GlqtZQi8FGSie9pdIRTw6LtM7KeCGGx vJrQ== X-Received: by 10.107.12.142 with SMTP id 14mr26665194iom.78.1446573219625; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:53:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.136.212 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 09:53:20 -0800 (PST) From: Daniel McClanahan Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:53:20 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: 25.0.50; invalid byte code in dired-x.elc To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) Byte-compiling lisp/dired-x.el generates invalid byte code in dired-x.elc, which manifests when attempting to use dired-x functions. Typically I resolve this by opening and manually evaluating dired-x.el. To reproduce on emacs -Q built from master: 1. Byte-recompile dired-x.el 2. Open dired-x.elc. 3. Attempt to evaluate the buffer. It should fail at the attempted evaluation of `dired-x-bind-find-file' with an "invalid byte code" error. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 03 19:09:49 2015 Received: (at 21821) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2015 00:09:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51995 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztle8-0001Es-Sv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 19:09:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38815) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztldp-0001EQ-Bj for 21821@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 19:09:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztldo-0005Jx-DT for 21821@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 19:09:29 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztldn-0005Jd-2Z; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 19:09:27 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztldl-0002lA-6f; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 19:09:25 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: Daniel McClanahan Subject: Re: bug#21821: 25.0.50; invalid byte code in dired-x.elc References: X-Spook: Sleet National Biosurveillance Integration Center STARLAN X-Ran: rC=el+I?bbDF!e}sy"MR7NIY`R"j?e9{|)hJ!YN!j?zWm\cLgV3i)yw+#.=Y*pG|{p9yO1 X-Hue: cyan X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 19:09:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Daniel McClanahan's message of "Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:53:20 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21821 Cc: 21821@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Daniel McClanahan wrote: > Byte-compiling lisp/dired-x.el generates invalid byte code in > dired-x.elc, which manifests when attempting to use dired-x functions. I can't reproduce this. You gave no details of platform or anything; perhaps you need to bootstrap. > To reproduce on emacs -Q built from master: > 1. Byte-recompile dired-x.el > 2. Open dired-x.elc. > 3. Attempt to evaluate the buffer. It should fail at the attempted > evaluation of `dired-x-bind-find-file' with an "invalid byte code" > error. Did you literally mean what you say, ie visit the .elc file than evaluate the buffer? I have never thought of doing that with an elc file, rather than use M-x load-file. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 04 03:15:24 2015 Received: (at 21821) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2015 08:15:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52187 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZttE3-00085v-O1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 03:15:24 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43472) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZttDj-00085Q-7l for 21821@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 03:15:22 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23093AC70; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 08:14:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Andreas Schwab To: Daniel McClanahan Subject: Re: bug#21821: 25.0.50; invalid byte code in dired-x.elc References: X-Yow: I like the IMPUDENT NOSE on that car.. Are you a TEEN-AGER? Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 09:15:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Daniel McClanahan's message of "Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:53:20 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21821 Cc: 21821@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Daniel McClanahan writes: > To reproduce on emacs -Q built from master: > 1. Byte-recompile dired-x.el > 2. Open dired-x.elc. > 3. Attempt to evaluate the buffer. elc files contain special markers that can only be interpreted correctly by load. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 04 04:40:18 2015 Received: (at 21821) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2015 09:40:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52288 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtuYC-0001cn-08 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 04:40:18 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:33426) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtuXp-0001by-3y for 21821@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 04:40:12 -0500 Received: by iodd200 with SMTP id d200so47823533iod.0 for <21821@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 01:39:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9KGAKXSJEbDK1TRQ/n1DD0Bx/hlH0jPXHF7dfOi5804=; b=dNtjkSWVBaTE1KB0N3UlNVzPMU/nVVuK8TUQ3w3BsEgHuWAh+xImbZkHza7mlxkNVo +ivXyWbXNQaq9208iwN/YkXYgq23zjo2znXSNX+swuzofl8d2iD+8drhg+XhEy9oGK8U 41Vpb4G8cFBr1f4LqA+c66MG58DTe1YenlTNWaW8Lqp49gTZ8AWZvLc/aQeyiB8y9i/y yZ4Ep36+F/6E8vdp4cyNQXBcJKC5Iz6/anBmH5C3lkgGNVkp02ohm6KpYQGuEG3m2CKP 1CQcLCk2RoRYcjB2PVZrGZc/0YJaPfo11EadrV9EWMxtBg2KxjwjfQKOwfDzf60JgiZM iT+Q== X-Received: by 10.107.13.13 with SMTP id 13mr1877205ion.72.1446629992470; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 01:39:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.136.212 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 01:39:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Daniel McClanahan Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 03:39:33 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#21821: 25.0.50; invalid byte code in dired-x.elc To: Andreas Schwab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21821 Cc: 21821@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) > elc files contain special markers that can only be interpreted correctly by > load. Ok, I wasn't aware of that. I attempted that in the first place because I hit the same "invalid byte code" error when attempting to use functions defined in dired-x as they were intended to be used; without evaluating the elc file manually, within dired, interactively. However, I cannot reproduce those now. I will update this if I am able to reproduce such an error. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Daniel McClanahan writes: > >> To reproduce on emacs -Q built from master: >> 1. Byte-recompile dired-x.el >> 2. Open dired-x.elc. >> 3. Attempt to evaluate the buffer. > > elc files contain special markers that can only be interpreted correctly > by load. > > Andreas. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de > GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 > "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 04 11:24:22 2015 Received: (at 21821) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2015 16:24:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53528 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu0rG-0004u0-9i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:24:22 -0500 Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com ([209.85.192.46]:34181) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu0rE-0004tq-Ia for 21821@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:24:20 -0500 Received: by qgem9 with SMTP id m9so44372352qge.1 for <21821@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 08:24:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=vI3cegW+BMjdYJXRQ2nbW0GvpIr8b7l4bGDXQDPR+Yo=; b=JjWIRtg8bQZo1xYxzqXAN4eevzQtRcfHb8d6Lasb/31OzMKpVNIF7fa4ewH9V2E8VE gcS1C/7bxjH19GD6uzsGgjtDvWs7fWVuxE2Ox99qJpyIbNxNm9skFjLSI4E9Is+B7IUG 4HiQ6n4IIctjjH9kYrvnwRgPbmspC8+IyxJes6OaGdyW/nzuNi21elWaHK9ghX0veYBL /1skBIRfEvpfPvYKgwCLN/KpHUpGcafM0aDL1XGbO+eyvQMUri3DpQqHIkILXATegiWw Ljse9tmQnVm7R5tGKm1tMTO1TJ5Nndn8o/n7omFAUfE9HEla5k8guua+tbs1XxVnr2YY BNbQ== X-Received: by 10.140.132.11 with SMTP id 11mr2531086qhe.64.1446654259972; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 08:24:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from Hermes-2.local (74.sub-70-192-3.myvzw.com. [70.192.3.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c31sm506415qga.13.2015.11.04.08.24.16 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2015 08:24:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by Hermes-2.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 99D1148DE53F; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:24:15 -0500 (EST) From: "John Wiegley" To: Daniel McClanahan Subject: Re: bug#21821: 25.0.50; invalid byte code in dired-x.elc In-Reply-To: (Daniel McClanahan's message of "Wed, 4 Nov 2015 03:39:33 -0600") Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:16:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21821 Cc: Andreas Schwab , 21821@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) >>>>> Daniel McClanahan writes: > Ok, I wasn't aware of that. I attempted that in the first place because I > hit the same "invalid byte code" error when attempting to use functions > defined in dired-x as they were intended to be used; without evaluating the > elc file manually, within dired, interactively. However, I cannot reproduce > those now. I will update this if I am able to reproduce such an error. Can we close the bug now, and reopen if you find a reproduction? John From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 04 12:10:45 2015 Received: (at 21821) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2015 17:10:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53602 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu1a8-0007kR-Pb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:10:44 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com ([209.85.213.181]:36169) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu1a7-0007kI-DU for 21821@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:10:43 -0500 Received: by igdg1 with SMTP id g1so110030858igd.1 for <21821@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 09:10:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=nl539nHBqX1OTxGe/PYgyt/qa3zOVSD2MZlho+DlBxY=; b=SwbMgj284qtlkqPcYYARiHyLC9Nxpf+b5XAp60NUQNxU3Ya/ekvGUWYrJ8Ys5zzxhf 9vupmdp4SuO9ZIN9+kvx3lgCFjhmoL3VI4Uv8kA/7/d3jZ9MtOi8cetERD7tqpZ5hP+o PPTTMakzjaFyUDYs1b0iwhH9sW6X1XJUq1pC5q+TYgqBkadl2mVimjn5S+y8REfP/p6T U22gmVc7RocGX1nNGmxJYbCaayuuKO/N8TwN/U9ZnTiRLqXTl4+9YDG9eBIF0aSjpqXq 92UWStpr5q7Gkt+4etcqjO5hyxe2zBPMwsqVST7U2AQPzLhPlPMBqXpmnD7J0JT/wVcx ggMw== X-Received: by 10.50.128.76 with SMTP id nm12mr4410995igb.79.1446657042867; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 09:10:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.136.212 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 09:10:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Daniel McClanahan Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:10:23 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#21821: 25.0.50; invalid byte code in dired-x.elc To: John Wiegley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21821 Cc: Andreas Schwab , 21821@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) > Can we close the bug now, and reopen if you find a reproduction? Yes. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:16 AM, John Wiegley wrote: >>>>>> Daniel McClanahan writes: > >> Ok, I wasn't aware of that. I attempted that in the first place because I >> hit the same "invalid byte code" error when attempting to use functions >> defined in dired-x as they were intended to be used; without evaluating the >> elc file manually, within dired, interactively. However, I cannot reproduce >> those now. I will update this if I am able to reproduce such an error. > > Can we close the bug now, and reopen if you find a reproduction? > > John From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 04 12:34:53 2015 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2015 17:34:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53615 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu1xV-0008Nj-JW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:34:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55837) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu1xB-0008N9-7x for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:34:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu1xA-0008Qk-Ai for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:34:33 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu1xA-0008Qg-7c for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:34:32 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Zu1x9-0000fp-UY for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:34:32 -0500 Subject: control message for bug 21821 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.99.98) Message-Id: From: Glenn Morris Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:34:31 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) tag 21821 notabug close 21821 From unknown Fri Aug 22 01:03:44 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator