GNU bug report logs - #21819
24.5; Overlay modification function called with wrong arguments

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Yutian Li | 李雨田 <hotpxless <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 08:26:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 21824

Found in versions 24.5, 25.0.50

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Yutian Li | 李雨田 <hotpxless <at> gmail.com>
To: 21819 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#21819: 24.5; Overlay modification function called with wrong arguments
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:24:41 -0800
Hi.

This happens on both Mac and GNU/Linux with latest release of Emacs. I
also tried the master branch of `git://git.sv.gnu.org/emacs.git` and
it still exists.

The discussion that led to the discovery of the bug is
[here](https://github.com/capitaomorte/yasnippet/issues/607). There is
a stack trace on the OP. Some guesses in the bottom. There is also
instructions to reproduce this.

The direct cause is the modification hook registered with the overlay
is called with apparently wrong arguments. The hook function is
registered with an overlay in the C++ buffer, but called with `beg`
and `end` referring to positions probably in the `*Messages*` buffer.
As the stack trace shows, Flycheck called `message` to display a
message indicating syntax errors, and `message` somehow invokes the
modification hook function, which was defined in C++ buffer but called
now in `*Messages*` buffer.

I traced into the Emacs source file `src/buffer.c`.  There is a
function `report_overlay_modification`. It *should* (I guess) be
called with `after` set to `false` and `true` alternatively. But on
the erroneous invocation, it is called with `after` set to `true`
twice consecutively. The first call `_beg` and `_end` are normal small
integer (inside C++ buffer). The second call they are huge and must
refer to the `*Messages*` buffer. Inside the call, it uses a global
array to store overlay modification hook functions. Now it's called
twice consecutively with `after` set to `true`, it must have reused
old hook functions, hence the call to our function with correct
overlay but wrong cursor. Because on a call with `after` set to
`false`, it will "clear" the hook functions.

Best regards,
Yutian LI | 李雨田

Mobile: +1 (650) 798-9092
E-mail: hotpxless <at> gmail.com

Computer Science Department
Stanford University




This bug report was last modified 6 years and 313 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.