From unknown Wed Aug 20 05:16:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#21819: 24.5; Overlay modification function called with wrong arguments Resent-From: Yutian Li | =?UTF-8?Q?=E6=9D=8E=E9=9B=A8=E7=94=B0?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 21819 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 21819@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.144653915216897 (code B ref -1); Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:26:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2015 08:25:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50392 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtWue-0004OS-3l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 03:25:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42937) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtWuc-0004OL-OS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 03:25:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtWub-0007Td-J9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 03:25:50 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtWub-0007TX-GD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 03:25:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52935) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtWua-00005L-8w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 03:25:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtWuZ-0007Sh-4G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 03:25:48 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]:35234) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtWuY-0006lh-VO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 03:25:47 -0500 Received: by oifu63 with SMTP id u63so4864529oif.2 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:24:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RrWPsxLcPEo7S6O04SzSj9GDnJQNi5n9Ms+EAHXHPzY=; b=LvudjsQZoua5SNyRsNZ3ISDDVK32oQenjNaGmGKiqe/1dNsv2bOJO3Y4JQb+bTChx9 n0i00X7R+hdqcn1D+Bv2DxE1G2up1XTsm6vKBznNLmXwPBtOsyJKLAMVbmB1IOF4/Xf/ K3A/OlMCwTugtNLRgHskY3tPb2csFbp/pmaqNu5/g8ItB5qiwdYPEhdB0MDxNLviz7Rr 9yVrzCkLM8Pj90uhT433kZVH50AeqMggHdiLXu+l3ufmuaSCYaOjENHI0suUKLYiCa27 IQw9P4u5UsBcbxSRqdftI6rC+3tSZKdcz2jMyJYK2zR2rA8lTIiDrwmPd9HIGSVKxH0A LroA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.173.142 with SMTP id w136mr16773452oie.128.1446539081677; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:24:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.227.129 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:24:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:24:41 -0800 Message-ID: From: Yutian Li | =?UTF-8?Q?=E6=9D=8E=E9=9B=A8=E7=94=B0?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Hi. This happens on both Mac and GNU/Linux with latest release of Emacs. I also tried the master branch of `git://git.sv.gnu.org/emacs.git` and it still exists. The discussion that led to the discovery of the bug is [here](https://github.com/capitaomorte/yasnippet/issues/607). There is a stack trace on the OP. Some guesses in the bottom. There is also instructions to reproduce this. The direct cause is the modification hook registered with the overlay is called with apparently wrong arguments. The hook function is registered with an overlay in the C++ buffer, but called with `beg` and `end` referring to positions probably in the `*Messages*` buffer. As the stack trace shows, Flycheck called `message` to display a message indicating syntax errors, and `message` somehow invokes the modification hook function, which was defined in C++ buffer but called now in `*Messages*` buffer. I traced into the Emacs source file `src/buffer.c`. There is a function `report_overlay_modification`. It *should* (I guess) be called with `after` set to `false` and `true` alternatively. But on the erroneous invocation, it is called with `after` set to `true` twice consecutively. The first call `_beg` and `_end` are normal small integer (inside C++ buffer). The second call they are huge and must refer to the `*Messages*` buffer. Inside the call, it uses a global array to store overlay modification hook functions. Now it's called twice consecutively with `after` set to `true`, it must have reused old hook functions, hence the call to our function with correct overlay but wrong cursor. Because on a call with `after` set to `false`, it will "clear" the hook functions. Best regards, Yutian LI | =E6=9D=8E=E9=9B=A8=E7=94=B0 Mobile: +1 (650) 798-9092 E-mail: hotpxless@gmail.com Computer Science Department Stanford University From unknown Wed Aug 20 05:16:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#21819: 24.5; Overlay modification function called with wrong arguments Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21819 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Yutian Li | =?UTF-8?Q?=E6=9D=8E=E9=9B=A8=E7=94=B0?= Cc: 21819@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 21819-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21819.14465644707202 (code B ref 21819); Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:28:01 +0000 Received: (at 21819) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2015 15:27:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51613 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtdV0-0001s6-2v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:27:50 -0500 Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:42823) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtdUf-0001rb-LS for 21819@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:27:48 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NX800300W3CAV00@mtaout25.012.net.il> for 21819@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 17:25:16 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NX80017PW63GA20@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 17:25:16 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 17:27:43 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83fv0nw1ao.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:24:41 -0800 > From: Yutian Li | 李雨田 > > This happens on both Mac and GNU/Linux with latest release of Emacs. I > also tried the master branch of `git://git.sv.gnu.org/emacs.git` and > it still exists. > > The discussion that led to the discovery of the bug is > [here](https://github.com/capitaomorte/yasnippet/issues/607). There is > a stack trace on the OP. Some guesses in the bottom. There is also > instructions to reproduce this. Thanks. I've read that discussion. Unfortunately, the instruction for reproducing the problem are not clear to me, I'd appreciate if someone could post them here in their entirety, ideally a single Lisp file that needs to be 'load'ed into "emacs -Q" after installing the minimal number of add-on packages that are strictly necessary for reproducing the problem. > The direct cause is the modification hook registered with the overlay > is called with apparently wrong arguments. The hook function is > registered with an overlay in the C++ buffer, but called with `beg` > and `end` referring to positions probably in the `*Messages*` buffer. > As the stack trace shows, Flycheck called `message` to display a > message indicating syntax errors, and `message` somehow invokes the > modification hook function, which was defined in C++ buffer but called > now in `*Messages*` buffer. It is entirely not clear to me how come a call to 'message' caused an overlay modification hook, probably set up by yasnippet, to be invoked. This is crucial information in order to investigate the problem, but AFAICS it's missing from the discussion you cite and from your report. > I traced into the Emacs source file `src/buffer.c`. There is a > function `report_overlay_modification`. It *should* (I guess) be > called with `after` set to `false` and `true` alternatively. But on > the erroneous invocation, it is called with `after` set to `true` > twice consecutively. The first call `_beg` and `_end` are normal small > integer (inside C++ buffer). The second call they are huge and must > refer to the `*Messages*` buffer. Inside the call, it uses a global > array to store overlay modification hook functions. Now it's called > twice consecutively with `after` set to `true`, it must have reused > old hook functions, hence the call to our function with correct > overlay but wrong cursor. Because on a call with `after` set to > `false`, it will "clear" the hook functions. Thanks for looking into this, but without the information showing how we wind up in 'report_overlay_modification' when some Lisp code called 'message', it is impossible to follow your reasoning. E.g., it is quite possible that the Lisp code in question sets up the modification hook incorrectly, or maybe the modification hook should check the value of the current buffer to avoid the problem. In general, 'report_overlay_modification' is called immediately before a change to a buffer that has overlays, and immediately after a change. The value of the AFTER argument depends on which one is it. So just given the fact you see 2 invocations with AFTER set to true does not yet mean there's a problem in Emacs core, it could be a legitimate call due to the fact that *Messages* gets changed when 'message' is called. Thanks. From unknown Wed Aug 20 05:16:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#21819: 24.5; Overlay modification function called with wrong arguments Resent-From: Yutian Li | =?UTF-8?Q?=E6=9D=8E=E9=9B=A8=E7=94=B0?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 21:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21819 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 21819@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 21819-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21819.144658438119185 (code B ref 21819); Tue, 03 Nov 2015 21:00:03 +0000 Received: (at 21819) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2015 20:59:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51853 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztig8-0004zM-FM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:59:41 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]:33710) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ztifn-0004yv-Py for 21819@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:59:38 -0500 Received: by obbwb3 with SMTP id wb3so23546247obb.0 for <21819@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:59:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zUAnWr3Z/T9sAyLaQGblUscUD5/Fur533JBemvyNvlY=; b=n3B1siMO/nunwxwf34eIrguve70QHwOp/Pl+pRfZZF6QRNnAW4d0vpDjyZU+imb7jw WxtIrbEU3S+3wmbg7ii/X43u/QSJzqQpfpx1Ie8+hz6gA2YxsxXC+NYVRVxjIZkvlHJs h7QTPH8aK/f3Tc54Hq/ij1fYOUaZMoOomMcubLcTX3213dPeWlBM+CFfulYfOOIVrl5v 5gKzaS63TSaGU665dradDK2pGHrQDuFcMkkYThFeH5A35RywwrmcJKQSifakCmM/kXfQ 7G9ap5hi488in5FAOPRN+uYx8Z6gcJiVv+HxuPnp5rqVVIFAk7iWfk1EUoIjfleNGv4C OHlQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.131.132 with SMTP id om4mr6456288obb.72.1446584359028; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:59:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.227.129 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:59:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83fv0nw1ao.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fv0nw1ao.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:59:18 -0800 Message-ID: From: Yutian Li | =?UTF-8?Q?=E6=9D=8E=E9=9B=A8=E7=94=B0?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:24:41 -0800 >> From: Yutian Li | =E6=9D=8E=E9=9B=A8=E7=94=B0 >> >> This happens on both Mac and GNU/Linux with latest release of Emacs. I >> also tried the master branch of `git://git.sv.gnu.org/emacs.git` and >> it still exists. >> >> The discussion that led to the discovery of the bug is >> [here](https://github.com/capitaomorte/yasnippet/issues/607). There is >> a stack trace on the OP. Some guesses in the bottom. There is also >> instructions to reproduce this. > > Thanks. > > I've read that discussion. Unfortunately, the instruction for > reproducing the problem are not clear to me, I'd appreciate if someone > could post them here in their entirety, ideally a single Lisp file > that needs to be 'load'ed into "emacs -Q" after installing the minimal > number of add-on packages that are strictly necessary for reproducing > the problem. > Yes. The init file is [here](https://gist.github.com/hotpxl/cfad63d5e88ed164bc76). It will automatically install dependencies. You have to manually `M-x irony-install-server` to install Irony. Then you could open up any C++ file. Define a function with a long name, and some parameters. Then when you try to type the name of the function, you will get completion candidates. If you choose the candidate, Irony will invoke YASnippet to lay out a template for the parameters, so you could tab through the parameters. If you then quickly fill the parameters and tab through, you will see the error. >> The direct cause is the modification hook registered with the overlay >> is called with apparently wrong arguments. The hook function is >> registered with an overlay in the C++ buffer, but called with `beg` >> and `end` referring to positions probably in the `*Messages*` buffer. >> As the stack trace shows, Flycheck called `message` to display a >> message indicating syntax errors, and `message` somehow invokes the >> modification hook function, which was defined in C++ buffer but called >> now in `*Messages*` buffer. > > It is entirely not clear to me how come a call to 'message' caused an > overlay modification hook, probably set up by yasnippet, to be > invoked. This is crucial information in order to investigate the > problem, but AFAICS it's missing from the discussion you cite and from > your report. > I don't think it *should* call the modification hook. I think this is where the bug happens. It basically calls the modification hook function with the overlay from C++ buffer, and positions from the `*Messages*` buffer. >> I traced into the Emacs source file `src/buffer.c`. There is a >> function `report_overlay_modification`. It *should* (I guess) be >> called with `after` set to `false` and `true` alternatively. But on >> the erroneous invocation, it is called with `after` set to `true` >> twice consecutively. The first call `_beg` and `_end` are normal small >> integer (inside C++ buffer). The second call they are huge and must >> refer to the `*Messages*` buffer. Inside the call, it uses a global >> array to store overlay modification hook functions. Now it's called >> twice consecutively with `after` set to `true`, it must have reused >> old hook functions, hence the call to our function with correct >> overlay but wrong cursor. Because on a call with `after` set to >> `false`, it will "clear" the hook functions. > > Thanks for looking into this, but without the information showing how > we wind up in 'report_overlay_modification' when some Lisp code called > 'message', it is impossible to follow your reasoning. E.g., it is > quite possible that the Lisp code in question sets up the modification > hook incorrectly, or maybe the modification hook should check the > value of the current buffer to avoid the problem. > > In general, 'report_overlay_modification' is called immediately before > a change to a buffer that has overlays, and immediately after a > change. The value of the AFTER argument depends on which one is it. > So just given the fact you see 2 invocations with AFTER set to true > does not yet mean there's a problem in Emacs core, it could be a > legitimate call due to the fact that *Messages* gets changed when > 'message' is called. > > Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 06 10:23:06 2015 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2015 15:23:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55982 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuir4-0005t3-3P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:23:06 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]:35885) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuiqk-0005sB-09 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:23:04 -0500 Received: by ioll68 with SMTP id l68so128497820iol.3 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 07:22:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=u+pgmQy8WmbMTzqRDddu5LT2enPerkHpRp8etUb6SBo=; b=jYO86DPGpocNKCl3AUOlC1HmVdvb19/dy66Tt4lQWl/MYeSyxM/nrohIVAHT2vtpNj JwH6Z7sVBnxEWwlj2iq6E19pD3umtArjqjMqX1Zk9ooM8wSzwo87ukD8zngX6dg7F1X5 m2lx2xdtO2HUpypxCIVAzAFsCdKUyzK9GM9bkd8Y1QKGlYotV8x9N+SASUG3c6jyV6wn op3k0sHmlkK+EjB8r3vu4jlwVjAyUu6HYBBV5H5Fw8T6UkgaZz0JPlEf37QWXKKUDP9P 9E86RhmJmoGU+cDcaQwLo2L5Z3wimCDSjJFI1fq75513q4mHA6HbZRxeK0FC20Ofrz87 fkwA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.7.210 with SMTP id g79mr9555573ioi.81.1446823365365; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 07:22:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.79.119.2 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 07:22:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:22:45 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mcrBeHEQcjAb7sRWx9lj6S6sha8 Message-ID: Subject: merge bugs 21819 21824 From: Noam Postavsky To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) merge 21819 21824 quit Didn't notice Yutian Li had already reported. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 15 10:12:29 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2018 14:12:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41697 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g1BJF-0001gs-6o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:12:29 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:52723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g1BJE-0001gf-7Y for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:12:28 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f46.google.com with SMTP id h3-v6so6127835ita.2 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:12:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=2Mz9gEXZANbLT9AwXGB+oCedaAkW1WUNB9JX4wDodaw=; b=S1Z72O087+uYChKoZjo0SyvMhmC8WD2JLZE6JjcSSzUWBq8vYXLlVOiTFTZL6Wbk7m ZUGavbAIenuGo8MsVmrktufNnKXvlbnFC8z9amhhzNY116vEUzPr4q8/+511uVsIXW4f r8yNzwqqBtQCvx9YbL4AjTCEcwIGdMkjOjxO8Wuw4tfHsuhain8p+pPwtFYIoHG0y96w YMXAn1c3MZwMzEte3PFSETi7wfgwGA1cAVaUtavFux7FNUC1cC4X8jDUUIkIM+1uSlWx QCh7GMKczAeBqIW3JrrVD6H9oTXNK5jyGw0L4RbEt8RPWhCh4BXI9Da+b7hffLLrXYGx J3CA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=2Mz9gEXZANbLT9AwXGB+oCedaAkW1WUNB9JX4wDodaw=; b=XW8hez4Uhzhs7RLROKRYWMtH8whmXF15yAanAjstXMkAZ84S1piHA4+l2hit+4FrFK VeP1lt4hDH9WK8wAWjW+AmvcMVkKO3gdywN98HTudypwJ5PwdZAdOgOWVnnguRD4aC7X r0VtJDQJBM11oTm7QJ1Oz+Al3834IIvVGzHYoavrpo1K6f0pndlguHJERB+hI1wIqGW3 AHcD54VTUPvHa3un2VqspbL3asHdILbathSHWrKwrMmGYd2ih36CHmZTYU2HbvanQN3y AavMY2ELhzKRXks3vWTsVz7+HRlAyMR86EcQ/ZJF6hR/sUbIq54N6+CEtimN5YCWnWhD G4dQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BYuNGkqt7rsL4BEYwVgulXlMvpgHTWvgsdVgrhF0tgQ/nITEP2 VipFlMZ1saSzzDchdLJF4syT9jID X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbpTXEQJItPj8YGE7BKrC/GpMvT788mqz8d3tOpokDyYlGnVjlGzwVnKdEJn8NKXD5T+pXoOg== X-Received: by 2002:a24:ccc6:: with SMTP id x189-v6mr4072645itf.110.1537020742832; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:12:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n187-v6sm5436900iod.66.2018.09.15.07.12.22 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:12:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #21824 Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:12:21 -0400 Message-ID: <8736uasvcq.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) unarchive 21824 quit