GNU bug report logs - #2179
23.0.60; define-key vs define-key-after key syntax

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Gerard Brunick <gbrunick <at> math.utexas.edu>

Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:40:04 UTC

Severity: minor

Done: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #20 received at 2179 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>
Cc: 2179 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Gerard Brunick <gbrunick <at> math.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: bug#2179: 23.0.60; define-key vs define-key-after key syntax
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:59:10 +0200

Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:

>>> Since define-key-after is only useful for menu-bar bindings which don't
>>> use characters in keys this doesn't look like a serious restriction.
>>
>> The doc string of `define-key-after' doesn't say that it's only for
>> menu-bar bindings.
>
> define-key-after is a compiled Lisp function in `subr.el'.
> [...]
> The order of bindings in a keymap matters when it is used as a menu.

So?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 314 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.