GNU bug report logs - #2179
23.0.60; define-key vs define-key-after key syntax

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>
To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 2179 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Gerard Brunick <gbrunick <at> math.utexas.edu>
Subject: bug#2179: 23.0.60; define-key vs define-key-after key syntax
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:48:50 +0200

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
>
>> Since define-key-after is only useful for menu-bar bindings which don't
>> use characters in keys this doesn't look like a serious restriction.
>
> The doc string of `define-key-after' doesn't say that it's only for
> menu-bar bindings.

define-key-after is a compiled Lisp function in `subr.el'.
[...]
The order of bindings in a keymap matters when it is used as a menu.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.