Subject: Re: bug#2176: 2176 proposal

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:40:37 +0200

Zachary Kanfer <[email-masked]> writes:

> What do you think of the effects of this patch?

The patch included just seems to remove the entire warning?

> Do we also want "Meta-x" instead of "M-x", to make it easier for such users,
> even though the usage is different from almost everywhere else in Emacs?

I'd say `M-x' instead of `Meta-x'.

>  -Zachary Kanfer
>
> === modified file 'lisp/startup.el'
> *** lisp/startup.el     2011-07-14 12:57:06 +0000
> --- lisp/startup.el     2011-07-28 05:56:34 +0000
> *************** a face or button specification."
> *** 1574,1586 ****
>                                auto-save-list-file-prefix)))
>         t)
>          (fancy-splash-insert :face '(variable-pitch font-lock-comment-face)
> !                           "\nIf an Emacs session crashed recently, "
> !                           "type "
> !                           :face '(fixed-pitch font-lock-comment-face)
> !                           "Meta-x recover-session RET"
>                             :face '(variable-pitch font-lock-comment-face)
> !                           "\nto recover"
> !                           " the files you were editing."))
>
>     (when concise
>       (fancy-splash-insert
> --- 1574,1587 ----
>                                auto-save-list-file-prefix)))
>         t)
>

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/