GNU bug report logs - #2173
an etc/compilation.txt GNU format entry not working

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System)
To: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
Subject: bug#2173: marked as done (an etc/compilation.txt GNU format entry
 not working)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:00:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:54:09 -0500
with message-id <87prhb4o4u.fsf <at> cyd.mit.edu>
and subject line Re: an etc/compilation.txt GNU format entry not working
has caused the Emacs bug report #2173,
regarding an etc/compilation.txt GNU format entry not working
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org
immediately.)


-- 
2173: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=2173
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> ics.uci.edu>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: an etc/compilation.txt GNU format entry not working
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:47:23 -0800 (PST)

In etc/compilation.txt:


[snip]
* GNU style

symbol: gnu

[snip]
foo.c:8-45.3: message
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This entry is not highlighted correctly.  
Is the entry incorrect, or the regexp that is supposed to match it does
not work properly?

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> ics.uci.edu>
Cc: 2173-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: an etc/compilation.txt GNU format entry not working
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:54:09 -0500

> foo.c:8-45.3: message
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This entry is not highlighted correctly.  
> Is the entry incorrect, or the regexp that is supposed to match it does
> not work properly?

Should be fixed now, thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.