GNU bug report logs - #21728
25.0.50; [patch] mention focus-{in,out}-hook in manual

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:49:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 25.0.50

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #19 received at 21728 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: larsi <at> gnus.org, aaronecay <at> gmail.com
Cc: 21728 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21728: 25.0.50; [patch] mention focus-{in,out}-hook in manual
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:44:01 +0200
> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:59:21 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: aaronecay <at> gmail.com, 21728 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> > Cc: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay <at> gmail.com>,  21728-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:31:47 +1100
> > 
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> > 
> > > No, they are also mentioned in the node "Input Focus".  And the node
> > > "Focus Events", where you suggested the addition, has a
> > > cross-reference to "Input Focus", near its beginning.  So perhaps what
> > > we need is a sentence near that cross-reference that somehow mentions
> > > these two hooks, and all the rest is already in place?  Would you like
> > > to suggest an alternative patch along these lines?
> > 
> > Hm...  is that really necessary, though?  With that xref it seems pretty
> > clear that the user should go to that node for more info on everything
> > connected with input focus, I think...
> 
> The xref doesn't mention the hooks.  I suggested to add a single
> sentence that does, that's all.

Now done on the emacs-25 branch.




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 91 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.