From unknown Wed Aug 20 02:46:10 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#21689: 23.4; shift+up received as Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21689 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Frank Breitling Cc: 21689@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 21689-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21689.156468525112733 (code B ref 21689); Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:48:02 +0000 Received: (at 21689) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 18:47:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55209 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htG6t-0003JJ-FA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 14:47:31 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:44150) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htG6r-0003JB-Sj for 21689@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 14:47:30 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htG6k-0002v2-Nf; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 20:47:28 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <561FD298.1060202@aip.de> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 20:47:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <561FD298.1060202@aip.de> (Frank Breitling's message of "Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:21:44 +0200") Message-ID: <87pnlohgee.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Frank Breitling writes: > I am referring to the problem described at > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2011-05/msg00211.html > > and > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10871745/shift-up-arrow-doesnt- [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Frank Breitling writes: > I am referring to the problem described at > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2011-05/msg00211.html > > and > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10871745/shift-up-arrow-doesnt-highlight-text-emacs-iterm2 > . > > The issue seems complicated and I don't understand it well. > > However, if it can't be fixed in emacs but somewhere else, please tell > me where the bug has to be fixed and reported that the problem can be > finally resolved. (I'm going through old bug reports that have unfortunately not gotten any responses.) I've tried this in Emacs 27 (under X and with -nw), and I'm unable to reproduce this error. Are you still seeing this? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 14:47:39 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 18:47:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55212 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htG70-0003Ji-PS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 14:47:38 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:44164) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htG6z-0003Ja-Jh for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 14:47:37 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htG6v-0002v8-Uv for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 20:47:36 +0200 Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 20:47:33 +0200 Message-Id: <87o918hge2.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #21689 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 21689 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 21689 + moreinfo quit From unknown Wed Aug 20 02:46:10 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#21689: 23.4; shift+up received as