GNU bug report logs - #21645
Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#21645: closed (Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug)
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 06:02:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:00:53 +0200
with message-id <87io6ga8dm.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#21645: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #21645,
regarding Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
21645: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21645
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: gojjoe <at> gmail.com
To: bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
Subject: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:57:56 +0200

Hi all,

I noticed that both fill-paragraph and LaTeX-fill-paragraph, 
called on a paragraph that contains "\( ... \)" inline math, 
will break lines after each "\)", except those on the last 
line. For example ("*" indicates where lines break, in case 
formatting is lost via email);

blah blah blah \(blah\)*
blah \(blah\)*
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah 
blah blah*
blah blah \(blah\)*
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah 
blah blah*
blah blah blah blah \(blah\) blah \(blah\) blah.

Weird behaviour, it appears also launching Emacs with the 
--no-init-file option.

Can you reproduce this? If so, is this to be considered a 
bug of fill.el or auctex?

Cheers,
J

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>
To: gojjoe <at> gmail.com
Cc: 21645-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21645: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:00:53 +0200

gojjoe <at> gmail.com writes:

Hi!

> Thank you very much. My bad, I should've checked this beforehand (and it wasn't
> my intention to submit a bug).  I didn't imagine there could be such a (useful)
> feature

Now you see. :-)

> – or I would've expected it to apply to '$...$' as well by default.

Yes, I think this has been a bug (at least since 2004) which I have
fixed right now.  So now \(...\) and $...$ and \[...\] and $$...$$
should be treated equally.

I'm closing this bug.

Bye,
Tassilo

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.