From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 08 03:58:11 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2015 07:58:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zk65b-0003Ho-FT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 03:58:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48125) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zk65Z-0003HT-Ah for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 03:58:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zk65Y-0006im-4n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 03:58:08 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:40674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zk65Y-0006ig-2C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 03:58:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zk65X-0006an-7t for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 03:58:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zk65S-0006fN-1d for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 03:58:07 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]:32965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zk65R-0006fH-SB for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 03:58:01 -0400 Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so16126076wic.0 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:58:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s2+Jt+r6A4+SRe8rS1asQYErNlHRpvelgpB1uTRVCCk=; b=j/Ayt1/ENSL0s5yVTmTilpVQrLaxsC6eZgfDb7wZUvKyGUy5MUgK9S7IvC3t28vY6s rS+UUL62xIugfABGTODy/gB0Ao7QeOdf9TaYI6pjPi+d/aI3vg6+pOmMJs7yFlugm/Yf aVmSAMv8DcovS6GYQ9mm1h/4mtykVMwXAQnB/WBCe+XGHCtCU97BEKFnhRz9Gf+KBBln bk2Aj6d8ulQGMl8RSYINLXT5lfrn6PsUH6f+1rJtK4j/HxI3Q1cB2WNHZD8tw4UrT6JX 1+MnlTXfzl+6RsIb7h98R4dUdrltuhtm2dXCddvA/4p86MylPUoD+iobR1WVjATPNXfy bA2w== X-Received: by 10.180.105.234 with SMTP id gp10mr2086815wib.51.1444291081057; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ([87.236.195.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q1sm44455676wje.39.2015.10.08.00.58.00 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:58:00 -0700 (PDT) To: bug-auctex@gnu.org From: gojjoe@gmail.com Subject: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug Message-ID: <56162204.8050105@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:57:56 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird/666 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 151007-2, 2015-10-07), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Hi all, I noticed that both fill-paragraph and LaTeX-fill-paragraph, called on a paragraph that contains "\( ... \)" inline math, will break lines after each "\)", except those on the last line. For example ("*" indicates where lines break, in case formatting is lost via email); blah blah blah \(blah\)* blah \(blah\)* blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah* blah blah \(blah\)* blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah* blah blah blah blah \(blah\) blah \(blah\) blah. Weird behaviour, it appears also launching Emacs with the --no-init-file option. Can you reproduce this? If so, is this to be considered a bug of fill.el or auctex? Cheers, J From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 08 11:14:38 2015 Received: (at 21645) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2015 15:14:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32784 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkCtx-0000M2-Lz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:14:37 -0400 Received: from nsmtp.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.14]:57228) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkCtu-0000Lt-Po for 21645@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:14:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nsmtp.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127832391B2; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:14:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at uni-koblenz.de Received: from nsmtp.uni-koblenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nsmtp.uni-koblenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ObuYlRXz2HDl; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:14:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.15]) by nsmtp.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:14:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thinkpad-t440p (dhcp02.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.71.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B0043D6005; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:14:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Tassilo Horn To: gojjoe@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#21645: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug References: <56162204.8050105@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 17:14:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <56162204.8050105@gmail.com> (gojjoe@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:57:56 +0200") Message-ID: <87twq1crza.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21645 Cc: 21645@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) gojjoe@gmail.com writes: > I noticed that both fill-paragraph and LaTeX-fill-paragraph, called on a > paragraph that contains "\( ... \)" inline math, will break lines after e= ach > "\)", except those on the last line. For example ("*" indicates where lin= es > break, in case formatting is lost via email); > > blah blah blah \(blah\)* > blah \(blah\)* > blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah* > blah blah \(blah\)* > blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah* > blah blah blah blah \(blah\) blah \(blah\) blah. > > Weird behaviour, it appears also launching Emacs with the --no-init-file > option. > > Can you reproduce this? If so, is this to be considered a bug of fill.el = or > auctex? Well, this is actually a feature: ,----[ C-h v LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators RET ] | LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators is a variable defined in =E2=80=98latex.el= =E2=80=99. | Its value is (\\\( \\\) \\\[ \\\]) |=20 | Documentation: | List of separators before or after which respectively a line | break will be inserted if they do not fit into one line. `---- ,----[ (info "(auctex)Filling") ] | -- User Option: LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators | List of separators before or after which respectively linebreaks | will be inserted if they do not fit into one line. The separators | can be curly braces, brackets, switches for inline math ('$', '\(', | '\)') and switches for display math ('\[', '\]'). Such formatting | can be useful to make macros and math more visible or to prevent | overfull lines in the LaTeX source in case a package for displaying | formatted TeX output inside the Emacs buffer, like preview-latex, | is used. `---- The "if they do not fit into one line" part is a bit unclear. But I think it means that a newline is inserted before \( if the formula is longer than what's still fitting into the current line, and a newline is inserted after \) when the remainder of the paragraph doesn't fit on the current line anymore. Well, that second case seems dubious to me. I don't understand why one would like to have that. Bye, Tassilo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 08 11:55:27 2015 Received: (at 21645) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2015 15:55:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32814 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkDXS-0001Jj-VV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:55:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:33337) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkDXQ-0001Ja-Bf for 21645@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:55:24 -0400 Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so35078404wic.0 for <21645@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 08:55:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:from:to:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VdPmYdCVtlukIcsBdAcOsgKsGwM0GfCaWrTGybVZAnk=; b=FmFem04Y94h9OG591BRRnTrmGAW1r27PbJI0VaaCIduEqzzHPW/QM5Dtbq70VlRZuT faaY1Hx1RCYfOQe3g+omm5+WFMcDzFjQSwVL0iZ1fVappCpUNhBXy+uljpJiy2/xYilT xo5VbhcnQafBzfEc548R5GSLCjA3yr8oaXmP1972vrkGGf9V4zVyoKP8Ed1gOgRVkzAP yYehcGXL/EF6tuCY6hFq9dTgTiJlrbDLj9OUZsvJvZhJ5KzZoj6tAgfsAPv2NfVe2jMa 4gemgcYH/K+KKwDvDtOUazZ6GV/FmLDcyOEsG+tqjxK+i7lPuAOJk5q+LzqSihpQFGqo KWoQ== X-Received: by 10.180.107.130 with SMTP id hc2mr4706847wib.92.1444319723559; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 08:55:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ([87.236.195.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ub7sm7771484wib.17.2015.10.08.08.55.22 for <21645@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Oct 2015 08:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#21645: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug References: <56162204.8050105@gmail.com> <87twq1crza.fsf@gnu.org> From: gojjoe@gmail.com To: 21645@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <561691E6.4090109@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:55:18 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird/666 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87twq1crza.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 151008-0, 2015-10-08), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21645 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Hi Tassilo, Thank you very much. My bad, I should've checked this beforehand (and it wasn't my intention to submit a bug). I didn't imagine there could be such a (useful) feature – or I would've expected it to apply to '$...$' as well by default. Cheers! J On Thu151008 17:14, Tassilo Horn wrote: > Well, this is actually a feature: > > ,----[ C-h v LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators RET ] > | LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators is a variable defined in ‘latex.el’. > | Its value is (\\\( \\\) \\\[ \\\]) > | > | Documentation: > | List of separators before or after which respectively a line > | break will be inserted if they do not fit into one line. > `---- > > ,----[ (info "(auctex)Filling") ] > | -- User Option: LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators > | List of separators before or after which respectively linebreaks > | will be inserted if they do not fit into one line. The separators > | can be curly braces, brackets, switches for inline math ('$', '\(', > | '\)') and switches for display math ('\[', '\]'). Such formatting > | can be useful to make macros and math more visible or to prevent > | overfull lines in the LaTeX source in case a package for displaying > | formatted TeX output inside the Emacs buffer, like preview-latex, > | is used. > `---- > > The "if they do not fit into one line" part is a bit unclear. But I > think it means that a newline is inserted before \( if the formula is > longer than what's still fitting into the current line, and a newline is > inserted after \) when the remainder of the paragraph doesn't fit on the > current line anymore. Well, that second case seems dubious to me. I > don't understand why one would like to have that. > > Bye, > Tassilo > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 09 02:01:02 2015 Received: (at 21645-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2015 06:01:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33270 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkQjl-0000sx-SB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 02:01:02 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:36114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkQji-0000sn-Px for 21645-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 02:00:59 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823672063C for <21645-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 02:00:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 09 Oct 2015 02:00:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=78rQNb3Xp/RyGLH BDU7aW0OZCzU=; b=N+qCcfGZkNicjfuEsz/t5KRiy5BVK239f0Oxl6yz4OqMfjO txYxEOFFfYX1UW332W5sYNWBbR2I7XuqOBbDS3Y5/r+6ACfgD+Wglf/robLbVpnF E6X1YVF6gMzAHcdAhGIhuMfucA/3R1STkuGnPCktgjGmXhAypJVhEXGulooY= X-Sasl-enc: W4hjLHaujbNgPHyuUMqO19hzx3no0J/OvmFqgx0XhROu 1444370456 Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.161.15.180]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 80F8FC00013; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 02:00:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Tassilo Horn To: gojjoe@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#21645: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug References: <56162204.8050105@gmail.com> <87twq1crza.fsf@gnu.org> <561691E6.4090109@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:00:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <561691E6.4090109@gmail.com> (gojjoe@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:55:18 +0200") Message-ID: <87io6ga8dm.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21645-done Cc: 21645-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) gojjoe@gmail.com writes: Hi! > Thank you very much. My bad, I should've checked this beforehand (and it = wasn't > my intention to submit a bug). I didn't imagine there could be such a (u= seful) > feature Now you see. :-) > =E2=80=93 or I would've expected it to apply to '$...$' as well by defaul= t. Yes, I think this has been a bug (at least since 2004) which I have fixed right now. So now \(...\) and $...$ and \[...\] and $$...$$ should be treated equally. I'm closing this bug. Bye, Tassilo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 27 14:12:55 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2015 18:12:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40788 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr8jc-0003CA-EA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:12:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38519) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr7Z6-0001Ls-Kc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:57:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr7Z2-0007O0-7U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:57:40 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:37025) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr7Z2-0007Nw-4g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:57:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr7Z1-0004wg-86 for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:57:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr7Yx-0007LO-DN for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:57:35 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr7Yx-0007KP-6Y for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:57:31 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr7Yu-0007R5-Ic for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:57:28 +0100 Received: from 193.134.202.243 ([193.134.202.243]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:57:28 +0100 Received: from lanz by 193.134.202.243 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:57:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-auctex@gnu.org From: Adrian Lanz Subject: Re: bug#21645: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:57:10 +0100 Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <56162204.8050105@gmail.com> <87twq1crza.fsf@gnu.org> <561691E6.4090109@gmail.com> <87io6ga8dm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.134.202.243 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:V1zEc2suvZTKFNBv1mbOBne/NSg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:12:34 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) On Fre 09 Okt 2015 (09:00:53 +0200) Tassilo Horn writes: [...] > >> – or I would've expected it to apply to '$...$' as well by default. > > Yes, I think this has been a bug (at least since 2004) which I have > fixed right now. So now \(...\) and $...$ and \[...\] and $$...$$ > should be treated equally. > > I'm closing this bug. > > Bye, > Tassilo > Oh, no! tex source code filling is ugly now with inline (within text) formulas - this is the environment \begin{math} ... \end{math}, the LaTeX shorthand \( ... \) and the TeX shorthand $ ... $. \[ ... \], $$ ... $$ and various environments such as \begin{equation} ... \end{equation} are different - displayed equation, on (a) separate line(s) between the text. Please revert! Adrian Lanz. [...] From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 27 14:29:53 2015 Received: (at 21645) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2015 18:29:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40803 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr90K-0003aG-V2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:29:53 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:34392) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr901-0003Zr-4P for 21645@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:29:51 -0400 Received: by wikq8 with SMTP id q8so224664193wik.1 for <21645@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:29:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zjUIOkDE6kBG2kBbTYcfYhz+it38nUXaEJ8ZRv9A0kg=; b=Iht1+3qQSjO4WaPa0nRVSilmsK2FoVB63g4/930WGvTrE64VAvxljPjVRx34t4GFSj BtAiKASvw8akzWv0bjcB7Bu5znL+Tbz7JscBjiwFkSg4rx9bfCd8qN4gmCMch/3KCskZ DS8krYD96L2H+xVKRnaFR8O4N08v1DiHEYfLeDIo9yrPO+m938JcoZn637oTLi8u123E ORtWhMKHC+633361md6oWC7/FRfKDFhCBRNxiHWzCiOXH6MmUKChSXgJlKeLxwilxTOW ds40gqpwG0BpI9o8wG5lF19ZirKD56o6oW/HbN9yJ97UXZZxeIigAb6TlqwxDLGg8FMQ 1KEA== X-Received: by 10.180.189.18 with SMTP id ge18mr8091872wic.95.1445970572321; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:29:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ([87.236.195.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gd10sm46227253wjb.47.2015.10.27.11.29.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#21645: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug To: Adrian Lanz , 21645@debbugs.gnu.org References: <56162204.8050105@gmail.com> <87twq1crza.fsf@gnu.org> <561691E6.4090109@gmail.com> <87io6ga8dm.fsf@gnu.org> From: gojjoe@gmail.com Message-ID: <562FC288.8080806@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:29:28 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird/666 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 151027-0, 2015-10-27), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21645 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Hi Adrian, > Please revert! You can revert to the original behaviour by customizing the variable 'Latex-fill-break-at-separators', checking "Opening Display Math Switch" and "Closing Display Math Switch" and leaving the other options unchecked. I think the developers are planning to setting this variable that way by default, so the original behaviour (with respect to $...$, but now also with respect to \(...\), more consistently) will be restored. Cheers, J From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 27 15:17:37 2015 Received: (at 21645) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2015 19:17:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40841 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr9kX-0004gl-6s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:17:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:35393) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr9kV-0004ga-8f for 21645@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:17:35 -0400 Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so173954049wic.0 for <21645@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:17:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LKLBNW9Cvd5XBMWEOOzgFWCKbS7TMVxr+r52Sw/FtDA=; b=fNmLpva4CRwv3ZLHBYoouwNc7qJPDzJn9ociD4uWSxCULk6zfQixsVBoB+wHxH9k8K G/ucxbaXX9gy4xu2HoCUfSrKZx7gD8LEjm8Kq0wMnfAbbAIf622ePHSdgCYzLKpEzHBj bscCRPft9hFNmAMIvWUp+5S2PVlJmXGlyplOa/XW6oRvzivK0J2NL2mCekN+63VXmWiU x3bA2Nmo9t/ot0/38NobTFtsdFaATQAubrzvTe6ODFtPYCcENhGOdDSB+wJNX9qcM/cg 84BTwCCYq9wR4x7y+rjfDhqzHbo4CRJMoDXzPsIop5lHwPcYMuycX4J2iQ6lZGqQBqNy DAEA== X-Received: by 10.180.206.212 with SMTP id lq20mr27181733wic.90.1445973454682; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ([87.236.194.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ca17sm2823069wib.12.2015.10.27.12.17.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#21645: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug To: Adrian Lanz , 21645@debbugs.gnu.org References: <56162204.8050105@gmail.com> <87twq1crza.fsf@gnu.org> <561691E6.4090109@gmail.com> <87io6ga8dm.fsf@gnu.org> <562FC288.8080806@gmail.com> From: gojjoe@gmail.com Message-ID: <562FCDCB.6030003@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:17:31 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird/666 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 151027-1, 2015-10-27), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21645 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Hi Adrian, > Is this > > (setq Latex-fill-break-at-separators '(\\\( \\\) \\\[ \\\])) > > ? You can change it either via the customization menu, like this: – type: M-x customize-variable [RET] LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators [RET] – Check "Opening Display Math Switch" and "Closing Display Math Switch", uncheck all others; – Left-click on "State" -> "Save for Future Sessions" Or putting, similarly to what you proposed, (setq LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators '(\\\[ \\\])) in your init file (but I'm not sure at which point you should insert this; for sure after auctex has been loaded). Cheers, J From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 28 04:01:34 2015 Received: (at 21645) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2015 08:01:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41144 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrLfq-00038T-Ge for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:01:34 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:50426) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrLfo-00038J-Qf for 21645@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:01:33 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182CC210C6 for <21645@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:01:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:01:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=R1pvwZWRCb+lNLsAtA9DkinHA5k=; b=RWs9/ Rv4UuvXiDual3if0dxzCHp2D+hsqjpQPBJlOiiG9SRTHNMF3BSn5cxjYw3KP/ym7 /RWCtIGsjy3TFB/iBXqSxih3XRjyHpF9olwOV5NC5sLtIIFpFB3xMPhDmMA4OFi0 wEIjnp7Bubgmk6DKC8rnbxajKTyt+mQl5x7JPc= X-Sasl-enc: VMmz7aSqGNABzWg1V0lG40MzjpQ3l3SUtrcJMoKSphC+ 1446019291 Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.160.91.232]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 86A0BC0001E; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:01:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Tassilo Horn To: gojjoe@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#21645: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug References: <56162204.8050105@gmail.com> <87twq1crza.fsf@gnu.org> <561691E6.4090109@gmail.com> <87io6ga8dm.fsf@gnu.org> <562FC288.8080806@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:01:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <562FC288.8080806@gmail.com> (gojjoe@gmail.com's message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:29:28 +0100") Message-ID: <87wpu7ctgn.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21645 Cc: Adrian Lanz , 21645@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) gojjoe@gmail.com writes: > I think the developers are planning to setting this variable that way > by default, so the original behaviour (with respect to $...$, but now > also with respect to \(...\), more consistently) will be restored. Yes, I've just done that so 11.89 or the next ELPA release won't use that special filling by default. :-) Bye, Tassilo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 28 04:40:18 2015 Received: (at 21645-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2015 08:40:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41168 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrMHJ-0004YK-Ni for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:40:18 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:60883) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrMGz-0004XH-Ai for 21645-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:40:16 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0198206D8 for <21645-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:39:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:39:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=MXdHK0Ey8gKFEl/yUSC9Rl7DvQ8=; b=rXUno ed7qqdB7dBujehvSKfb5gL9kP4WxmOtytshSKoSaqA5ElpiqvHZKZYDOg6SG8OIW 60nW4IMkoHBjqAhTQ9A5k+muyC7tYcO82M5HRrJgBsCVD7nR4ynmAYcMIEOS/ISA aZ5uGDAeMA7AZNEmwDjALEHz0AYQzvDF3Yq/Qo= X-Sasl-enc: KGK9KLbPUs8+7jf7aRWXy8my5Auzquk3c1t8RN5Npenc 1446021596 Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.160.91.232]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D0DB3C00012; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:39:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Tassilo Horn To: gojjoe@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#21645: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug References: <56162204.8050105@gmail.com> <87twq1crza.fsf@gnu.org> <561691E6.4090109@gmail.com> <87io6ga8dm.fsf@gnu.org> <562FC288.8080806@gmail.com> <87wpu7ctgn.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:39:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wpu7ctgn.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:01:28 +0100") Message-ID: <87mvv3crom.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21645-done Cc: Adrian Lanz , 21645-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Tassilo Horn writes: >> I think the developers are planning to setting this variable that way >> by default, so the original behaviour (with respect to $...$, but now >> also with respect to \(...\), more consistently) will be restored. > > Yes, I've just done that so 11.89 or the next ELPA release won't use > that special filling by default. :-) I'm closing this bug issue. Bye, Tassilo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 28 06:55:17 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2015 10:55:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41238 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrONx-0000vl-Db for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:55:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55205) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrONc-0000un-NT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:55:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrONY-0003hI-Do for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:54:56 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:53921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrONY-0003hE-Ak for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:54:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrONX-0002nA-Dj for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:54:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrONS-0003gh-DS for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:54:51 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrONS-0003gW-6c for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:54:46 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrONP-0000HX-63 for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:54:43 +0100 Received: from 193.134.202.243 ([193.134.202.243]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:54:43 +0100 Received: from lanz by 193.134.202.243 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:54:43 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-auctex@gnu.org From: Adrian Lanz Subject: Re: bug#21645: Inquiry: reproducibility of a paragraph-fill bug Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:54:34 +0100 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <56162204.8050105@gmail.com> <87twq1crza.fsf@gnu.org> <561691E6.4090109@gmail.com> <87io6ga8dm.fsf@gnu.org> <562FC288.8080806@gmail.com> <87wpu7ctgn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.134.202.243 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wSfhdgtGollbCE8movNOV6hwnqg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) On Mit 28 Okt 2015 (09:01:28 +0100) Tassilo Horn writes: > gojjoe@gmail.com writes: > >> I think the developers are planning to setting this variable that way >> by default, so the original behaviour (with respect to $...$, but now >> also with respect to \(...\), more consistently) will be restored. > > Yes, I've just done that so 11.89 or the next ELPA release won't use > that special filling by default. :-) > > Bye, > Tassilo Great. Thanks! From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:37:18 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator