From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 07 06:52:11 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2015 10:52:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57790 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjmKQ-0007e6-Q8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:52:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40160) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjmKO-0007dy-Aw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:52:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjmKN-0007RG-1b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:52:07 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjmKM-0007R3-VN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:52:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjmKM-0002Mp-8F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:52:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjmKL-0007Pq-F7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:52:06 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]:34879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjmKL-0007PP-8m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:52:05 -0400 Received: by lacdq7 with SMTP id dq7so7774716lac.2 for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 03:52:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vr6c+mHxFI2YrIsY7lisitM3RdWnt/f/RJQW3sMuhrU=; b=rSwd9T4hoB/akbRfNXEiwC5jACv1GISqXwOcUMeZTf3kbWdbBOMpwqB0myIlDJsBNn s+OVtuBm1gfYsiveJ8tJ4Sb711C/SSNkZUAoakmReLcvD6hgC9XVID42t1sl/zcmVpek vt6BNSGAY/3J3lw+tb+sJQUK42izfVtF5SAHX16GSvDRkKYLg/L2Nk4gffRP2kzVEvV0 vHn7I5BEBYcHzu4hEyWDkSb7UIldOfmRngaCIUvFukSwrRcs5Gl5kxpmdv3edeJdHkLn UI0QcFTDHAGQq1rtom4FiY/TuxD0uU62ZyTd2orCmuYfwo6NGKWXr3rkdwQFPhVUo9Yb E8XQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.168.228 with SMTP id zz4mr185795lbb.73.1444215124332; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 03:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.27.78 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 03:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:52:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: 25.0.50; Fontset-font is never scaled From: Artur Malabarba To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) I have the following snippet in my init file. (set-face-attribute 'default nil :height 100 :font "SourceCodePro Medium") (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" nil (font-spec :size 40 :name "Symbola")) On my Ubuntu system, this means any characters no supported by the main font (SourceCodePro) will displayed in the Symbola font and considerably scaled up in size (good). On my Arch GNU/Linux system, the same happens, except the Symbola characters are not scaled up in size. By inspecting them with C-u C-x = I can verify that the Symbola font is indeed being used: xft:-unknown-Symbola-normal-normal-semicondensed-*-13-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1 (#x1BE3) Both are compiled from master. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 07 11:45:38 2015 Received: (at 21640) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2015 15:45:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjquP-0007sU-7u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 11:45:37 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:38996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zjqu3-0007rr-DC for 21640@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 11:45:34 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NVU00B00WYVZU00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 21640@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 18:45:13 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NVU00B1WX3DWV30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 18:45:13 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 18:45:13 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#21640: 25.0.50; Fontset-font is never scaled In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Artur Malabarba Message-id: <83d1wqel86.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21640 Cc: 21640@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:52:04 +0100 > From: Artur Malabarba > > I have the following snippet in my init file. > > (set-face-attribute 'default nil :height 100 > :font "SourceCodePro Medium") > (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" nil > (font-spec :size 40 :name "Symbola")) > > On my Ubuntu system, this means any characters no supported by the > main font (SourceCodePro) will displayed in the Symbola font and > considerably scaled up in size (good). > > On my Arch GNU/Linux system, the same happens, except the Symbola > characters are not scaled up in size. By inspecting them with C-u C-x > = I can verify that the Symbola font is indeed being used: > > xft:-unknown-Symbola-normal-normal-semicondensed-*-13-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1 > (#x1BE3) > > Both are compiled from master. Is the configuration the same, including the font back-ends? In general, I think you are getting undefined behavior: you specify a fixed size of 40 pixels, but expect it to be a kind of "relative" size? Is that documented somewhere? (I never used explicit size parameters in fontsets, so maybe I'm missing something.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 07 15:14:47 2015 Received: (at 21640) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2015 19:14:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59278 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjuAo-0006bF-Sn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:14:47 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com ([209.85.217.179]:34471) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjuAm-0006b5-RP for 21640@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:14:45 -0400 Received: by lbbwt4 with SMTP id wt4so22780694lbb.1 for <21640@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 12:14:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JN8LrY+bEmWKel1X1a14YGTcE/0gYPD10+1bVLMlRLc=; b=s3LAY+G12Z6OBsiolomE4AJjG4JQozpbJqTT6M48TP2ofFpc7lkGT2w5R3Y/5ZBVDS iut02BWUl3gY4pk89YgpIXSsyaMHfXZtnMBXEu9EOu8RS2kIzk+iS2poIi7oMcVKDG5C DE10AbP2zyPvrKsPyR/ne6fAhD63gpl1en9/sMf2xYmHnlWeXYAmq5k4LrPEQe1pTOmR fm0INDi2p52PBtudMEKUzEmtKmXItj3AgHKFW2ox2NN5eoIH8JL1mqpqntoviEvzDRgK xMDt9aBWuxugIskoTvVco04UxwUZYJgSOJNtAr+WIoHpKIjPUZGuvAH0EbXui4p01Iw4 nm1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.54.169 with SMTP id k9mr1468920lbp.95.1444245284037; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 12:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.27.78 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 12:14:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83d1wqel86.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d1wqel86.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:14:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#21640: 25.0.50; Fontset-font is never scaled From: Artur Malabarba To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21640 Cc: 21640@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) > Is the configuration the same, including the font back-ends? The init files are the same (and I see this problem from emacs -Q too), but there are many differences in system configuration outside Emacs (most of which I probably don't know). I haven't configured font-backends. If I query for it in frame-parameters I get `(font-backend xft x)'. Swapping their order or removing the `x' makes no difference. Removing the `xft' segfaults Emacs. > In general, I think you are getting undefined behavior: you specify a > fixed size of 40 pixels, but expect it to be a kind of "relative" > size? Is that documented somewhere? No, I expect to be bigger than my regular font, which is much less than 40 pixels. I can change it to any other number with no effect. I tried using a float too, which should represent a size in points according to the docstring, but there's still no difference. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 07 15:20:43 2015 Received: (at 21640) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2015 19:20:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59282 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjuGX-0006p0-RX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:20:42 -0400 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:62000) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjuGT-0006oi-QS for 21640@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:20:39 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NVV006006V8DP00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 21640@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:20:35 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NVV0064C72998A0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:20:33 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:20:33 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#21640: 25.0.50; Fontset-font is never scaled In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Artur Malabarba Message-id: <8337xmeb9a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d1wqel86.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21640 Cc: 21640@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:14:43 +0100 > From: Artur Malabarba > Cc: 21640@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Is the configuration the same, including the font back-ends? > > The init files are the same (and I see this problem from emacs -Q > too), but there are many differences in system configuration outside > Emacs (most of which I probably don't know). > > I haven't configured font-backends. If I query for it in > frame-parameters I get `(font-backend xft x)'. > Swapping their order or removing the `x' makes no difference. Removing > the `xft' segfaults Emacs. > > > In general, I think you are getting undefined behavior: you specify a > > fixed size of 40 pixels, but expect it to be a kind of "relative" > > size? Is that documented somewhere? > > No, I expect to be bigger than my regular font, which is much less > than 40 pixels. I can change it to any other number with no effect. > I tried using a float too, which should represent a size in points > according to the docstring, but there's still no difference. Could it be that the version of Symbola is different between the two systems, and one of them cannot be scaled like you want? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 08 05:25:29 2015 Received: (at 21640) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2015 09:25:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59769 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zk7S4-0007I0-T1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 05:25:29 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]:33451) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zk7S2-0007Hq-EV for 21640@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 05:25:27 -0400 Received: by lbos8 with SMTP id s8so39609843lbo.0 for <21640@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 02:25:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BLDIPNvdXFZK/J5674Vg8kfE+qLmgBKOkhGRREPJsl0=; b=tI8yVbknUXIlNZRe0Vibgqltbj3ushnBC1+5ysbKvdWHZv4OEUDj7HWRortR6A1eKE zi7KZxLKiMnKxB7OFl3K093FbRDRfXwTO58Z5cu3jGc2hIoDHJV3IY0lEB4gkx9HRzZD X6fTbrJOEKyUMYZ7L/RzY3ajhc2AyqviD1VvJ3QYD85AFFKLigueqA2zobks5j/uOdUP ICJIYnRBdvntNb/oZMVldRQZm5T7VpdYNLSoQO7PrzDzwQUeJ7btGtz3Lh8zw9EWrbM8 Agk+P3kGQSV8pmHSt45uGsZ3aL07XzAbypQAPFcj7fmHkHLwO0qH8XjjQzuHoKfdZ/9V EIDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.207.82 with SMTP id f79mr2023590lfg.73.1444296325730; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 02:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.27.78 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 02:25:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8337xmeb9a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d1wqel86.fsf@gnu.org> <8337xmeb9a.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:25:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#21640: 25.0.50; Fontset-font is never scaled From: Artur Malabarba To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21640 Cc: 21640@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) 2015-10-07 20:20 GMT+01:00 Eli Zaretskii : > Could it be that the version of Symbola is different between the two > systems, and one of them cannot be scaled like you want? It's possible, I don't know how to look up font versions. The version of the package that I installed for this font is 8.0.0 on Arch, but I can't even find out where the font comes from on Ubuntu (probably pre-installed). Anyway, the matter is more complicated then I initially thought. Even on Ubuntu it doesn't work on every Symbola character. For instance, I can get it to work with the "MATHEMATICAL DOUBLE-STRUCK DIGIT ____" family. If I inspect the char I get this description: xft:-unknown-Symbola-normal-normal-semicondensed-*-50-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1 (#x14CD) But it doesn't seem to work with anything from the "SMILING FACE WITH ___" family. xft:-unknown-Symbola-normal-normal-semicondensed-*-16-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1 (#x18FA) Note how one is correctly using the size 50 (which I had previously set via `(font-spec :size 50 :name "Symbola")'), and the other is using size 16. Does anyone know where is the code responsible for figuring out this number when the char is inserted? (so I can investigate) Anyway, I'm pretty sure most characters worked on a previous Arch installation I had. I'll test it on a previous Emacs version to figure out if the regression is in Emacs or in my system. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 17 01:43:30 2019 Received: (at 21640) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2019 06:43:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40034 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWEHR-0006M1-MZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:43:29 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:43056) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWEHP-0006Ln-AD for 21640@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:43:27 -0500 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iWEHE-00048j-Lg; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 07:43:19 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Artur Malabarba Subject: Re: bug#21640: 25.0.50; Fontset-font is never scaled References: <83d1wqel86.fsf@gnu.org> <8337xmeb9a.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 07:43:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Artur Malabarba's message of "Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:25:25 +0100") Message-ID: <878soff1fg.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Artur Malabarba writes: > Anyway, the matter is more complicated then I initially thought. Even > on Ubuntu it doesn't work on every Symbola character. > For instance, I can get it to work with the "MATHEMATICAL > DOUBLE-STR [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ingebrigtsen.no] -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21640 Cc: 21640@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Artur Malabarba writes: > Anyway, the matter is more complicated then I initially thought. Even > on Ubuntu it doesn't work on every Symbola character. > For instance, I can get it to work with the "MATHEMATICAL > DOUBLE-STRUCK DIGIT ____" family. If I inspect the char I get this > description: > xft:-unknown-Symbola-normal-normal-semicondensed-*-50-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1 > (#x14CD) > > But it doesn't seem to work with anything from the "SMILING FACE WITH > ___" family. > xft:-unknown-Symbola-normal-normal-semicondensed-*-16-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1 > (#x18FA) I tried reproducing this (starting from -Q), but I'm not sure whether I'm doing it right. First I evaled: (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" nil (font-spec :size 80 :name "Unifont Upper")) Then inserted SMILING FACE WITH SMILING EYES AND THREE HEARTS (which uses that font), and I got: ftcrhb:-PfEd-Unifont Upper-normal-normal-normal-*-80-*-*-*-d-0-iso10646-1 (#x2886) Character code properties: customize what to show name: SMILING FACE WITH SMILING EYES AND THREE HEARTS So it seems to work for me. Has this bug gone away in the meanwhile, or are you still seeing it? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 17 01:43:33 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2019 06:43:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40037 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWEHV-0006MG-1S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:43:33 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:43080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWEHR-0006Lq-Vw for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:43:30 -0500 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iWEHK-00048o-Cz for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 07:43:24 +0100 Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 07:43:21 +0100 Message-Id: <877e3zf1fa.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #21640 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 21640 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 21640 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 17 06:31:49 2020 Received: (at 21640-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2020 10:31:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40014 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jPOHk-00020h-U1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:31:49 -0400 Received: from ted.gofardesign.uk ([67.225.143.91]:46926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jPOHj-00020T-EH for 21640-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:31:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marxist.se; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JFCWVisnpBSDXGWBSBeY//yzEB+RkT8idILPtSb/zxE=; b=nwdTiivGA+3trnCe7b7QoA9Axq XDtUTMZf24751FDstLvf5L3VEib6APg8KZld2VsFLQ1IjKLT52CurUklFMERXcREXmf8QFWxtRRro B1eogWuscAc2xf+CCxzJ1Kx41au1Hrr4fkW105vDc+EHyzsGrEHZbzDYZlORMyjFbcs8J97c4JFKs drUGOu71z5SJt9IrApJ/Ec3paRvLnlKrBddeYGGO1bfhh+tfs1T1gwJEHTxu1pwulNgNUVtUgx1ZY DUwBXPxZjqrLP248q83Hd9RBXYVshlkYWgfuyVVV8g8QYM+7knlRFMXiay7Gc2GMiFZBzg1DUUvGj YlSPveEg==; Received: from h-4-70-69.a785.priv.bahnhof.se ([155.4.70.69]:37910 helo=localhost) by ted.gofardesign.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jPOHc-001nOe-Ux; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:31:41 -0400 From: Stefan Kangas To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#21640: 25.0.50; Fontset-font is never scaled In-Reply-To: <878soff1fg.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 17 Nov 2019 07:43:15 +0100") References: <83d1wqel86.fsf@gnu.org> <8337xmeb9a.fsf@gnu.org> <878soff1fg.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:31:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnc6tnck.fsf@stefankangas.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ted.gofardesign.uk X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - marxist.se X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ted.gofardesign.uk: authenticated_id: stefan@marxist.se X-Authenticated-Sender: ted.gofardesign.uk: stefan@marxist.se X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21640-done Cc: Artur Malabarba , 21640-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Artur Malabarba writes: > >> Anyway, the matter is more complicated then I initially thought. Even >> on Ubuntu it doesn't work on every Symbola character. >> For instance, I can get it to work with the "MATHEMATICAL >> DOUBLE-STRUCK DIGIT ____" family. If I inspect the char I get this >> description: >> xft:-unknown-Symbola-normal-normal-semicondensed-*-50-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1 >> (#x14CD) >> >> But it doesn't seem to work with anything from the "SMILING FACE WITH >> ___" family. >> xft:-unknown-Symbola-normal-normal-semicondensed-*-16-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1 >> (#x18FA) > > I tried reproducing this (starting from -Q), but I'm not sure whether > I'm doing it right. First I evaled: > > (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" nil > (font-spec :size 80 :name "Unifont Upper")) > > > Then inserted SMILING FACE WITH SMILING EYES AND THREE HEARTS (which > uses that font), and I got: > > ftcrhb:-PfEd-Unifont Upper-normal-normal-normal-*-80-*-*-*-d-0-iso10646-1 (#x2886) > > Character code properties: customize what to show > name: SMILING FACE WITH SMILING EYES AND THREE HEARTS > > So it seems to work for me. Has this bug gone away in the meanwhile, or > are you still seeing it? More information was requested, but none was given within 21 weeks, so I'm closing this bug. If this is still an issue, please reply to this email (use "Reply to all" in your email client) and we can reopen the bug report. Best regards, Stefan Kangas From unknown Mon Aug 18 02:37:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator