Subject: Re: bug#21637: Subject: 24.5; dired-do-compress

From: Ken Brown <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:56:23 -0400

On 10/7/2015 4:22 PM, Devon Sean McCullough wrote:
> P.S. Obviously foo.tar would be treated likewise.

That's not at all obvious.  I would expect foo.tar to be compressed to 
foo.tar.gz.  I think that's a much more common use case.

Ken