From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 05 15:47:19 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2015 19:47:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55450 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBjC-0007eA-IU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:47:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60137) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBj9-0007e1-Em for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:47:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBj8-0006mG-9i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:47:14 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:40146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBj8-0006mB-75 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:47:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41904) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBj7-0000wE-GE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:47:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBj4-0006lO-9P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:47:13 -0400 Received: from dancol.org ([96.126.100.184]:46476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBj3-0006l5-Vy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:47:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To; bh=WI+NwnK/CC+RUoBb+j5gfNpyYAV1yPcYyCcd1u/ptqw=; b=gp0QpYNi/x8POxVJpgCCwSV+6b1pOv9PVb+9pKTB9cCabJHSN7+dt6r5XlahxXDSbKtu/W1n2K3kMfRpfKbnnZh5kKsOmt0Kgy4t2cd4933khR3tTQzkbF2KGGmxu92NPv1Y+TdOSyCXnjhegonEcu4LBKZn8kyqoBFEryv63WZc4fTkh8g5YMMfkP6+iCdGX1GtdZGo1txY5VTWridhzyErYi8B01ClshWFF154gRSN1yDrcn5Fj3we4N59lp7soL50sABb5oCamdgf49B2Mkzhn4xTwxLavkLuwDIFM027+SKrpy5zIqcRggtGvc8RmtG02C0Ktu23jJQWq5Qifg==; Received: from [2620:10d:c090:200::a:efe4] (helo=[IPv6:2620:10d:c083:10fb:2ab2:bdff:fe1c:db58]) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBj2-0003Uv-UJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:47:08 -0700 To: bug-emacs From: Daniel Colascione Subject: Syntax weirdness lately Message-ID: <5612D3B5.1070301@dancol.org> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:47:01 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eiQffWs8QHnVRqgmSUJwibnF1taRQRkJ7" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --eiQffWs8QHnVRqgmSUJwibnF1taRQRkJ7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In latest master, syntax-propertize application seems to be buggy in a way I can't readily reproduce or analyze. Consider this bit of shell: elif [[ $c =3D '\' ]]; then state=3Dword-backslash Sometimes, unreproducibly of course, we don't close the string at the trailing single quotation mark, and the rest of the buffer ends up being a string, at least up until the single quotation mark. A similar problem in Python sometimes leads to Python inflooping in buffers containing strings triple-quoted with single quotation marks: it appears that we interpret "'''" as just an empty single-quoted string, followed by a single-quoted opener. Did we change something about how complex syntax rules work lately? Revision history doesn't point to anything. --eiQffWs8QHnVRqgmSUJwibnF1taRQRkJ7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWEtO1AAoJEN4WImmbpWBlS3oP/REuVqxREYN7uwZdNh8WndQ4 myBFvJ9YKdRvbvOf0MlrUoSQdheNvizJGXVxrXGdpUCdcMTSKUCQysOh2O91U//K T5Y8SoSyXK3+BBLlKlzrEo9pLLE5P5OUdw/oxRH8aF/82HVtZCoX7mTnAfSzSYTS FSH9dyYmR62dFLfeC+1Eoq56+lqazOBFnlGwsWwdlPxYrmC+5VrOjGUVgvGBU1SD SRZefUh8C/oBrXa32UOWbScJkv4pisNEQ6AKcXpozGmBUoTuwO8TF93x9otO4ZZR 275Qi15pKuPE0wDeyFO5IKTBbE5vydfbG0po0zru2518sTJ1u8T78NZiVsdF09/6 lCaTXeWBQSlAgiDqgcNI9UQWv8XHIu/i3gTdyfW9FiuKjZLujZ6tnrijzYgy8z9e mhG9W/M+D5X/9xR1bj1drOIYcbnO3Zy/Fcf3mVq/derOxtxZ3LgtmLayfJf548gT tFCee0NqMRX79Vm6trTCzicEEa3MHIzvJFhFRuw0NC61GOalKphq1P8rfduD7zEs GZhl5OCm0JtAw6txg/mEkoMkNvHPxxjNzpPa5wHq+kJezr9pl/MxyuN6PAmiSFRE LoRurOEF0sbeZLhjvXCACpXWykx6lid2koUJ9YVU9gz+J32wiZdXuU2wsK2dmiPo 0AEqfC66Z9TN3ykpz5lu =egKB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eiQffWs8QHnVRqgmSUJwibnF1taRQRkJ7-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 05 16:50:32 2015 Received: (at 21624) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2015 20:50:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55503 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCiO-0002Fh-6B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:50:32 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:33165) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCiL-0002FY-SA for 21624@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:50:30 -0400 Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so138728620wic.0 for <21624@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:50:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0T0O1S6CmHmjVsbSbRvnjMnijtAD7RlTF14p+YE0G40=; b=IF/sKUIeo686cCNzHchqPSaT7+MTxBA+WOV6pof0rYaCjt+OnR5Mf28tm0bbOGSp0W OlWvl0tcIrEmhnMKeTC5IDGHueQcHGztUup5+QMUB3m3ZDe6lYQ14PS8PNiVuP8D6zEl K6CpFTLrf7iXd9wgX3DG7KipfcYTMYHTHHa8OSnPLHIjRAyK35kGhsSMcq4iDo96PVTN p/iwvogfOsr21F+WfCg0T8sopsXz/baqUmPWJJGeM/Dk0maPChDV2YD2xNGsmfLBLZw+ yA9PHd/1mrD2spCBMXtwDG4X7IkY+UAvCFEyWP72s44CjNelIJb9NZtXPsGCT21GMBzT ODqA== X-Received: by 10.180.79.5 with SMTP id f5mr12691328wix.79.1444078229197; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id jv5sm27919701wjb.16.2015.10.05.13.50.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:50:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#21624: Syntax weirdness lately To: Daniel Colascione , 21624@debbugs.gnu.org References: <5612D3B5.1070301@dancol.org> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <5612E292.9050207@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:50:26 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5612D3B5.1070301@dancol.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21624 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On 10/05/2015 10:47 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote: > Did we change something about how complex syntax rules work lately? > Revision history doesn't point to anything. There have been some changes in syntax.c not too long ago, e.g. in 3928ef2dd5b8febf3b1d9c1bfb22af3698d16bea. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 05 16:52:52 2015 Received: (at 21624) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2015 20:52:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55508 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCke-0002J2-Ll for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:52:52 -0400 Received: from dancol.org ([96.126.100.184]:59708) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCkc-0002It-GD for 21624@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:52:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject; bh=LpxNZy7z//y1/JCYmr7682KkCEsIQiAB5V5BIS/he7k=; b=RDOnRWQB2NlMPE1ss72Pt8oHt04e+l+bEFyG/u1u+iWFl6QHuJ9XCHxEGyMc9X7Lx741QgfXUp6KeMjC1eYasonuD6swtzPBj9QFL5oDB5WqAeQMFYEheCK/4ieTtmZhU+7o5uCNNgGOB3T6W04Cv4cwEmGP7sqXVl10b5Uy9oQGe4w9+63IoOK7VpCgLeNaHHrF8acfANfWZdmsmUpTdbFcp9uy+i/QWK+NSIErS1ZqzXwg2cq5CEw+gRdzZcPk52uxX+ydh/mQT5FEvmUxTCJhV2kV6zdO9HrhwH5NqkC5nWqPem7tPgVOYP3LosXCjU+OaZRh/xCbn9jZtn7szw==; Received: from [2620:10d:c090:200::a:efe4] (helo=[IPv6:2620:10d:c083:10fb:2ab2:bdff:fe1c:db58]) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCka-0003nw-I1; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:52:48 -0700 Subject: Re: bug#21624: Syntax weirdness lately To: Dmitry Gutov , 21624@debbugs.gnu.org References: <5612D3B5.1070301@dancol.org> <5612E292.9050207@yandex.ru> From: Daniel Colascione Message-ID: <5612E31A.4070003@dancol.org> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:52:42 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5612E292.9050207@yandex.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f1paOW15ouKet6f8kW7BUcbp7WqGpN2Co" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21624 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --f1paOW15ouKet6f8kW7BUcbp7WqGpN2Co Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/05/2015 01:50 PM, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 10/05/2015 10:47 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote: >=20 >> Did we change something about how complex syntax rules work lately? >> Revision history doesn't point to anything. >=20 > There have been some changes in syntax.c not too long ago, e.g. in > 3928ef2dd5b8febf3b1d9c1bfb22af3698d16bea. Thanks. I'll have to read the code. Since Stefan's changes touched the syntax-propertize stuff and the problems I'm seeing involve that code path, the on-demand stuff is a prime suspect. But I have no repro, and I'm not particularly familiar with how the syntax machinery works. --f1paOW15ouKet6f8kW7BUcbp7WqGpN2Co Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWEuMaAAoJEN4WImmbpWBlxKoP/0qUBfQh9/AnA1OSCoEmL96N 2Mz4RP2FTPV6K3iue9VCh3NzISjAmTZWyZag/Didyir57Sx3pkr6azHWkfmEXjoR x6oldThzqMf0djzh1VNRBMoc+ILcUJGdu5C4+AZMZOy25x5xDrp/5CF809Aolyr1 32Sg+xrIPi8FeV4A3oVRTUHwoO3TO66Hxi3jTmEArrGHXL+HaQ9wlWmd7u19rcFo xPrfjnDvV3ocqJMB7bu7fCvJvEmKpAvcteSq/F6KnN4f5nZEnOvYwe6HKoqn1jO7 Uc1gQHedGvjj6nmtlRF7poaPiPeE0FQLu8Xw1i6uqIJ2SrDNemL7uG4/KxYWirtB Up7aWCSDCdJf9r7UU5YckkhmZkT4nPLL9R9XQew6+duhAjEe8bOFKIbGUgvQWwF8 fe8BqcMYkmN15/Sgeo/IyhnWRWgVzwl7v/7gygzGuiXrVv4Sj0nc+9tbMoFxBAQU 3BJzmWdgf31mp3WBbEtAjyp2b9ErAG+ON/jGutLKhcXJtA/Jp7JYfOvIqtXKv1zz L+//F5zLkkQorvZoVlIp4FcV/vaXk31CUU9hcX8l+ZKUgBV3T3NSOfB8fnGBg+TN pkPb+jcYsHmrr9FNp7NJ5vxwynR8r29ao+6q+zgPT4EN+axe5P73mXkQsMeK+fHJ kOda22Gx1cp8LOq9zAce =o2aK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f1paOW15ouKet6f8kW7BUcbp7WqGpN2Co-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 08 17:03:47 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2016 22:03:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34936 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cF6n5-0002qo-84 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:03:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58183) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cF6n3-0002qH-Ht for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:03:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cF6mx-0002d2-Vl for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:03:40 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cF6mx-0002cx-SM for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:03:39 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cF6mx-0007z2-KV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:03:39 -0500 Subject: control message for bug 21624 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.99.98) Message-Id: From: Glenn Morris Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:03:39 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) tag 21624 + wontfix From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 08 17:03:42 2016 Received: (at 21624-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2016 22:03:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34933 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cF6n0-0002qQ-0f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:03:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58177) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cF6mz-0002qB-78 for 21624-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:03:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cF6mt-0002bV-Ei for 21624-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:03:36 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cF6mt-0002an-Bb for 21624-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:03:35 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cF6mp-0007yc-MM; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:03:31 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 21624-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#21624: Syntax weirdness lately References: <5612D3B5.1070301@dancol.org> <5612E292.9050207@yandex.ru> <5612E31A.4070003@dancol.org> X-Spook: Influenza FAA SAFE Ft. Knox bomb propaganda Power lines X-Ran: .QS^]]OEyyR&/bRL.hMMCn@n3p>HMx?_o-_CJVVIVW/7f0$#A\JxGz^hR=lF;P=O7i_sTs X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:03:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5612E31A.4070003@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:52:42 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21624-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) I don't see how anything can be done with this report as it stands, so given that it's been a year I'm closing it. Feel free to reopen, or make a new report, if there is something more substantive to say. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:33:39 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator