GNU bug report logs - #21612
24.5; Configuration variable to delete auto-save file when intentionally killing buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Marcus <mrok4a <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 16:37:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: moreinfo

Found in version 24.5

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #11 received at 21612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marcus <mrok4a <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 21612 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21612: 24.5; Configuration variable to delete auto-save file
 when intentionally killing buffer
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 19:53:05 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 16:51:12 +0200
> > From: Marcus <mrok4a <at> gmail.com>
> >
> > This might even be useful default behavior.

> People sometimes answer YES by mistake.

Isn't that why the "Modified buffers exist" question is yes/no rather than
y/n?

> I guess it could be OK as an option for people who like to live
dangerously.

I do, and have so far implemented the functionality as (not with an option,
I don't know how):
(add-hook 'kill-buffer-hook 'delete-auto-save-file-if-necessary)
(add-hook 'kill-emacs-hook 'delete-auto-save-file-if-necessary)

If I figure out how to have this controlled by an option, where (and how)
would I send a patch request?

BTW, is my mailing list etiquette (formatting of replies etc.) acceptable?
This is my first bug report to a free software project.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 266 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.