From jpff@codemist.co.uk Mon Feb 2 03:45:01 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Feb 2009 11:45:02 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA,MDO_DATING14 autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n12BivuQ016467 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:44:59 -0800 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:57608 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LTxCp-00012a-Nn for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:43:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LTxEV-0002Yq-Sr for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:44:57 -0500 Received: from smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk ([212.23.3.141]:39818) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LTxEV-0002Ym-EU for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:44:55 -0500 Received: from [217.155.197.248] (helo=codemist.co.uk) by smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LTxEU-0003Ze-I4 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:44:54 +0000 Received: from cardew.codemist.co.uk ([172.16.4.17]) by codemist.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LTxEU-0001yh-As for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:44:54 +0000 Received: from jpff by cardew.codemist.co.uk with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LTxET-0003Xb-TB for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:44:54 +0000 From: jpff To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Subject: 23.0.90; Another failure to convert to mbox Message-Id: Sender: jpff Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:44:53 +0000 X-Originating-Smarthost02-IP: [217.155.197.248] X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) I am attempting to convert my main mail file (96Mb) to mbox format. It stpped after 105 messages having joined tne next message to it, and apparently losing the other 17K messages I cannot see anything wrong with the message being converted ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1,, Summary-line: 26-Jan to: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk [21] #Re: Look_for_quad Date: Fri, 26 Jan 96 10:17:20 GMT From: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk Subject: Re: Look_for_quad To: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk *** EOOH *** Date: Fri, 26 Jan 96 10:17:20 GMT From: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk Subject: Re: Look_for_quad To: jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk Message written at 26 Jan 1996 08:14:40 +0000 --- Copy of mail to hearn@rand.org --- In-reply-to: <9601250123.AA13977@hilbert.rand.org> (message from Tony Hearn on Wed, 24 Jan 96 17:23:56 -0800) It looks as if it has decided that the form is a quartic, but then later finds that the x^2 term has a zero coefficient. It looks as if I fail to deal with sqrts of perfect squares; I assume that the form sqrt(x^2) has been simplified before it gets to this code. At one level this is a simplification failure, or I could accept that it happens and treat degenerate cases. A very simple paliative would be to add a line "if null numr a then return nil" in look_for_quad, after the line commented "Re-centre". The integral then fails, but does not crash. I will give it a little more thought. ==John  1,, Summary-line: 26-Jan jhd@maths.bath.ac.uk [10] #Can I recommend Received: from haldane1.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa27004; 26 Jan 96 15:35 GMT Date: Fri, 26 Jan 96 15:34:41 GMT From: James Davenport To: algebra@maths.bath.ac.uk Subject: Can I recommend *** EOOH *** Date: Fri, 26 Jan 96 15:34:41 GMT From: James Davenport To: algebra@maths.bath.ac.uk Subject: Can I recommend (not necessarily for all the details, but the style) "The Hich-hikers Guide to Grobner Bases" ~jhd/TeX/Others/1326.ps.Z James  ......etc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ These two message are treated as one I have hacked all the other mail mail files to mbox, but this one has me totally confused. In GNU Emacs 23.0.90.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.0) of 2009-02-02 on cardew Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.70200000 Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: en_GB.UTF-8 value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=local locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default-enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Fundamental Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t global-auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-x k C-x C-b C-x o d d C-x 1 C-x C-e C-x C-f R M A I L y y C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-v C-x k y e s C-x C-f M-x C-g M-x f i n d - f i l e - l i R M A I L y M-s q C-s q u a d C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-s C-a C-g M-v M-v M-v M-x r e p o r t - Recent messages: Writing messages to /tmp/rmail12648IOB...done Replacing BABYL format with mbox format... Counting messages...done Replacing BABYL format with mbox format...done Counting messages...done call-interactively: End of buffer Entering debugger... Quit File RMAIL is large (94MB), really open? (y or n) Quit [2 times] From jpff@codemist.co.uk Mon Feb 2 05:15:21 2009 Received: (at 2161) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Feb 2009 13:15:22 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from codemist.co.uk (Debian-exim@west.codemist.co.uk [217.155.197.248] (may be forged)) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n12DFHlJ008052 for <2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:15:19 -0800 Received: from cardew.codemist.co.uk ([172.16.4.17]) by codemist.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LTydw-0002B4-Po for 2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:15:16 +0000 Received: from jpff by cardew.codemist.co.uk with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LTydw-0003gH-Fw for 2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:15:16 +0000 From: jpff To: 2161@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: This might explain it Message-Id: Sender: jpff Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:15:16 +0000 I have been single stepping the convertion for the last 2 hrs and it failed with Warning (undo): Buffer `RMAIL' undo info was 99232433 bytes long. The undo info was discarded because it exceeded `undo-outer-limit'. This is normal if you executed a command that made a huge change to the buffer. In that case, to prevent similar problems in the future, set `undo-outer-limit' to a value that is large enough to cover the maximum size of normal changes you expect a single command to make, but not so large that it might exceed the maximum memory allotted to Emacs. If you did not execute any such command, the situation is probably due to a bug and you should report it. From lekktu@gmail.com Mon Feb 2 07:51:44 2009 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Feb 2009 15:51:44 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=4.0 tests=MISSING_SUBJECT,NOSUBJECT, VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail-ew0-f10.google.com (mail-ew0-f10.google.com [209.85.219.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n12FpeqB014742 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 07:51:41 -0800 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so2068915ewy.1 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:51:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c+M6GVjMAQARkCA3sAxnjQdlKg0IAVkMyCG0ulIW9xE=; b=X2bhx0NxWaDh7A/wGk9SwZEd0o/lEYTMO9w7FHHcT/XbC4GnUbUkxPEemTy+UBB1OM Dhisc2OYUC1hy1/5gjhQgkVi82CrDcvGLn7Fs7dJJmwpHxIvMdhDlA/AayQSGwAOBIPC 3VPY74h10qJ+ZcwXrIHVESswKSRZoxIKTr+BQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=u6lPM2UZBl2XTdlwq/+DLXms/R7n5rJHrHOFv+9vFx30jGLQFkyW9Fj8tYrBfs+fct iWPJUuvk36rjtw5cy9j7SC7V28tdTqO2iGDOLRdBiNAREXeizbz21fpIjViBMmlTHS9C QOW8u5ujmHXdlaY8O7bC5vS9pItAeouFwkQc8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.62.3 with SMTP id k3mr1730666eba.76.1233589894432; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:51:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:51:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: From: Juanma Barranquero To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit reassign 2156 emacs,rmail reassign 2161 emacs,rmail quit From jpff@codemist.co.uk Mon Feb 2 11:10:27 2009 Received: (at 2161) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Feb 2009 19:10:27 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, MDO_DATING14 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from codemist.co.uk (Debian-exim@west.codemist.co.uk [217.155.197.248] (may be forged)) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n12JAO2V000941 for <2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:10:25 -0800 Received: from cardew.codemist.co.uk ([172.16.4.17]) by codemist.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LU4Bb-0003GH-GX; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:10:23 +0000 Received: from jpff by cardew.codemist.co.uk with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LU4BW-0004G6-2Y; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:10:18 +0000 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:10:17 +0000 Message-Id: <4681-Mon02Feb2009191017+0000-jpff@codemist.co.uk> X-Mailer: emacs 23.0.90.1 (via feedmail 8 I) From: jpff To: 2161@debbugs.gnu.org In-reply-to: "owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com"'s message of Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:50:04 +0000 Subject: Re: bug#2161: Acknowledgement (23.0.90; Another failure to convert to mbox) References: I think I determined that the problems were all due to unrmail not using the same conditions for mail boundaries as used in the babyl format. Earlier in this development cycle my mail file was modified due to font problems and there were bursts of ESC characters and odd codes for diacritic marks. These completely throw the unrmail program. I did hundreds of hand edits and it now converts. There have also been a number of unflagged changes that have caused problems. rmail-set-label I have already reported. rmail-set-attribute is also very different and incompatible. I managed to break the mbox format once but I think I have recovered all the mail. I still cannot load the RMAIL file except in fundamental mode and then M-x rmail-mode fixes it. I cannot get MIME decoding to work like I used to, but I suspect I just gave not found the package. I was using etach but that is very babyl-specific. Likewise my label manager needs a complete rewrite. I found one function i used no-longer available (rmail-narrow-to-non-pruned-header) Reading new mail seems problematic and the new code breaks my operating system layout. What else has changed in rmail-mode that a user needs to know? ==John ffitch From eliz@gnu.org Mon Feb 2 11:21:28 2009 Received: (at 2161) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Feb 2009 19:21:28 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (mtaout6.012.net.il [84.95.2.16]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n12JLLHa003393 for <2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:21:22 -0800 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KEG00M00DQ1JJ00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for 2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:20:38 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.158.130]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KEG001IYDQBOY21@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:20:36 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:20:19 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#2161: 23.0.90; Another failure to convert to mbox In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: jpff , 2161@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: > From: jpff > Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:44:53 +0000 > Cc: > > I am attempting to convert my main mail file (96Mb) to mbox format. > It stpped after 105 messages having joined tne next message to it, and apparently losing the other 17K messages > > I cannot see anything wrong with the message being converted But what was the error message and the backtrace this time? From eliz@gnu.org Mon Feb 2 11:25:21 2009 Received: (at 2161) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Feb 2009 19:25:21 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MDO_DATING14 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il (mtaout1.012.net.il [84.95.2.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n12JPItX004204 for <2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:25:19 -0800 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KEG00C00DNP1Y00@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for 2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:25:34 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.158.130]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KEG00B6PDYE17L0@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:25:32 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:25:08 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#2161: This might explain it In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: jpff , 2161@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: > From: jpff > Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:15:16 +0000 > Cc: > > I have been single stepping the convertion for the last 2 hrs and it > failed with > > Warning (undo): Buffer `RMAIL' undo info was 99232433 bytes long. > The undo info was discarded because it exceeded `undo-outer-limit'. No, this is just a warning. I get it also when running unrmail on large Babyl files, but the conversion does not fail for me. (I think we should disable undo inside unrmail, but that's not a fatal problem.) From rms@gnu.org Mon Feb 2 17:44:54 2009 Received: (at 2161) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 3 Feb 2009 01:44:54 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n131ipuG000825 for <2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:44:53 -0800 Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LUAJc-00067a-1g; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:43:04 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 From: Richard M Stallman To: jpff , 2161@debbugs.gnu.org CC: 2161@debbugs.gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from jpff on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:15:16 +0000) Subject: Re: bug#2161: This might explain it Reply-to: rms@gnu.org References: Message-Id: Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:43:04 -0500 Warning (undo): Buffer `RMAIL' undo info was 99232433 bytes long. The undo info was discarded because it exceeded `undo-outer-limit'. Maybe some code (in unrmail?) should bind buffer-undo-list to t. From rgm@gnu.org Mon Feb 2 20:09:40 2009 Received: (at 2161) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 3 Feb 2009 04:09:40 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1349XsF005094 for <2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:09:34 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LUCZe-0001Ha-1c; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:07:46 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: rms@gnu.org Cc: 2161@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#2161: This might explain it References: X-Spook: MIT-LL anthrax Soviet Security Council CDMA HAMASMOIS SRI X-Ran: rM/p=y-=AQct4*}:'Nu0>x>pcQ_if?jV@)EJB/Z@Ce9vCdm!@EAH4EV-W|Bo+rp(|v=#u> X-Hue: cyan X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:07:45 -0500 Message-ID: <0uocxkw4by.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Richard M Stallman wrote: > Warning (undo): Buffer `RMAIL' undo info was 99232433 bytes long. > The undo info was discarded because it exceeded `undo-outer-limit'. > > Maybe some code (in unrmail?) should bind buffer-undo-list to t. Done. From rgm@gnu.org Tue Feb 3 19:44:48 2009 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 4 Feb 2009 03:44:48 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n143ij0p005096 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:44:46 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LUYfB-0005ye-MS; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:42:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18825.3777.585548.191552@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:42:57 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: control message merge 2156 2161 reassign 2184 emacs,ns forcemerge 801 2134 severity 2031 minor severity 2159 minor From unknown Wed Sep 10 09:28:43 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: $requester Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # A New Hope # A log time ago, in a galaxy far, far away # something happened. # # Magically this resulted in the following # action being taken, but this fake control # message doesn't tell you why it happened # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator