GNU bug report logs - #21429
24.5; More robust test for calls to `package-initialize' in init file

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: bruce.connor.am <at> gmail.com
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#21429: closed (24.5; More robust test for calls to
 `package-initialize' in init file)
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:15:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:14:35 +0100
with message-id <CAAdUY-L9rFqQrDaaFZTNe_zSC35SY7R8BdSOuz0z770swN=5iw <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#21429: 24.5; More robust test for calls to `package-initialize' in init file
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #21429,
regarding 24.5; More robust test for calls to `package-initialize' in init file
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
21429: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21429
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Phil Sainty <psainty <at> orcon.net.nz>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.5; More robust test for calls to `package-initialize' in init file
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 02:26:26 +1200

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

The code which checks the user's init file for calls to
`package-initialize' doesn't take the optional argument to
that function into account.

[0001-More-robust-check-for-package-initialize-calls-in-in.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am <at> gmail.com>
To: 21429-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21429: 24.5; More robust test for calls to
 `package-initialize' in init file
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:14:35 +0100

Pushed.
Thanks again.

2015-09-08 2:08 GMT+01:00 Phil Sainty <psainty <at> orcon.net.nz>:
> On 2015-09-08 08:34, Artur Malabarba wrote:
>>
>> Have you done the copyright paperwork?
>
>
> Yes.
>

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.