GNU bug report logs - #21424
guile-2.0: SIGALRM signal handler does not get called when guile blocks on I/O

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 21424 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Cc: Panu Kalliokoski <panu.kalliokoski <at> gmail.com>, 685919 <at> bugs.debian.org,
 685919-forwarded <at> bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#685919: guile-1.6: SIGALRM signal handler does not get called
 when guile blocks on I/O
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 12:18:43 -0500

[If possible, please preserve the -forwarded address in any replies.]

Reference: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765497

Panu Kalliokoski <panu.kalliokoski <at> gmail.com> writes:

> While playing with guile on my system, I discovered a weird anomaly
> which I could not reproduce on other systems running guile.  If I
> install a signal handler for SIGALRM, it won't get called while guile is
> making an I/O system call.  To demonstrate:
>
> [atehwa <at> karaihin ~/proj/psyk]$ guile
> guile> (alarm 2)
> 0
> guile> Herätyskello
> [atehwa <at> karaihin ~/proj/psyk]$ guile
> guile> (sigaction SIGALRM (lambda (x) (display "now!") (newline)))
> (0 . 335544320)
> guile> (alarm 2)
> 0
> guile> now a lot more than two seconds has passed, while I wrote this
> now!
> <unnamed port>: In expression now:
> <unnamed port>: Unbound variable: now
> ABORT: (unbound-variable)
> [...]
>
> As you can see, the signal handler gets called as soon as guile returns
> from read(2), already before calling (eval).
>
> I can't get to understand what causes this on my system, because another
> Debian system with exact same versions of guile-1.6, libc6 and
> libguile-ltdl-1 seems to work fine, and interrupts the read(2) call with
> the signal handler.

This appears to still be the case with at least Debian's 2.0.11+1-10
package, and setting the handler to something that doesn't perform IO
has the same effect (i.e. no alarm until you hit return):

  (sigaction SIGALRM (lambda (x) (exit 1)))

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Message #8 received at 21424 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org>
To: 21424 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 765497-forwarded <at> bugs.debian.org
Cc: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21424: Acknowledgement (Bug#685919: guile-1.6: SIGALRM signal
 handler does not get called when guile blocks on I/O)
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 12:49:46 -0500

retitle 21424 guile-2.0: SIGALRM signal handler does not get called when guile blocks on I/O
thanks

GNU bug Tracking System <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.

Note: I used the wrong bug number (the old guile-1.6 clone) in the
original forwarding.

It should have been 765497, and so the Debian forwarded address would be
765497-forwarded <at> bugs.debian.org, as in the headers above.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Message #13 received at 21424 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org>
Cc: 21424 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Panu Kalliokoski <panu.kalliokoski <at> gmail.com>,
 685919 <at> bugs.debian.org, 685919-forwarded <at> bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: bug#21424: Bug#685919: guile-1.6: SIGALRM signal handler does not
 get called when guile blocks on I/O
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:17:33 +0200

It does seem clear that we have a bug here; evidently signals do not
wake up the reader, neither with readline nor without.

Andy

On Sun 06 Sep 2015 19:18, Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org> writes:

> [If possible, please preserve the -forwarded address in any replies.]
>
> Reference: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765497
>
> Panu Kalliokoski <panu.kalliokoski <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> While playing with guile on my system, I discovered a weird anomaly
>> which I could not reproduce on other systems running guile.  If I
>> install a signal handler for SIGALRM, it won't get called while guile is
>> making an I/O system call.  To demonstrate:
>>
>> [atehwa <at> karaihin ~/proj/psyk]$ guile
>> guile> (alarm 2)
>> 0
>> guile> Herätyskello
>> [atehwa <at> karaihin ~/proj/psyk]$ guile
>> guile> (sigaction SIGALRM (lambda (x) (display "now!") (newline)))
>> (0 . 335544320)
>> guile> (alarm 2)
>> 0
>> guile> now a lot more than two seconds has passed, while I wrote this
>> now!
>> <unnamed port>: In expression now:
>> <unnamed port>: Unbound variable: now
>> ABORT: (unbound-variable)
>> [...]
>>
>> As you can see, the signal handler gets called as soon as guile returns
>> from read(2), already before calling (eval).
>>
>> I can't get to understand what causes this on my system, because another
>> Debian system with exact same versions of guile-1.6, libc6 and
>> libguile-ltdl-1 seems to work fine, and interrupts the read(2) call with
>> the signal handler.
>
> This appears to still be the case with at least Debian's 2.0.11+1-10
> package, and setting the handler to something that doesn't perform IO
> has the same effect (i.e. no alarm until you hit return):
>
>   (sigaction SIGALRM (lambda (x) (exit 1)))
>
> Thanks

Message #16 received at 21424 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org>
To: 21424 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: 685919-forwarded <at> bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: bug#21424: guile-2.0: SIGALRM signal handler does not get
 called when guile blocks on I/O
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 13:52:04 -0600

Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org> writes:

> This appears to still be the case with at least Debian's 2.0.11+1-10
> package, and setting the handler to something that doesn't perform IO
> has the same effect (i.e. no alarm until you hit return):
>
>   (sigaction SIGALRM (lambda (x) (exit 1)))

Just checked -- still true with 3.0.9.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.