From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 04 16:31:23 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2015 20:31:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49040 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXxdr-0000kf-HK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:31:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58593) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXxdq-0000kY-Hz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:31:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXxdp-0007XQ-It for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:31:22 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXxdp-0007XK-Fs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:31:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40360) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXxdo-0001j8-LG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:31:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXxdk-0007Uq-La for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:31:20 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0188.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.188]:38869 helo=smtprelay.hostedemail.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXxdk-0007UG-HN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:31:16 -0400 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (unknown [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F911268E11; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 20:31:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 4C656E4057656973626572672E636F6D X-HE-Tag: girls83_62249a3b72e40 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1384 Received: from [192.168.1.21] (c-50-148-129-97.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.148.129.97]) (Authenticated sender: Len@Weisberg.com) by omf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 20:31:14 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Len Weisberg Subject: 24.3; Buffer-menu-unmark fails to unmark a Save request Message-ID: <55E9FF92.7050002@Weisberg.com> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:31:14 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Just as stated in the subject: emacs 24.3; Buffer-menu-unmark fails to unmark a Save request Here is a fixed version (adding the second tabulated-list-set-col ) : (defun Buffer-menu-unmark (&optional backup) "Cancel all requested operations on buffer on this line and move down. Optional prefix arg means move up." (interactive "P") (tabulated-list-set-col 0 " " t) (tabulated-list-set-col 2 (if (buffer-modified-p (Buffer-menu-buffer)) "*" " ") t) (forward-line (if backup -1 1))) --------------- In GNU Emacs 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.10.7) of 2014-03-07 on lamiak, modified by Debian Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11501000 System Description: Linux Mint 17.2 Rafaela From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 15:36:04 2019 Received: (at 21418) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 19:36:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55310 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htGrr-0002cp-TL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:36:04 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:44954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htGrq-0002cO-8o for 21418@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:36:02 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htGrl-0003Fg-Oh; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:36:00 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Len Weisberg Subject: Re: bug#21418: 24.3; Buffer-menu-unmark fails to unmark a Save request References: <55E9FF92.7050002@Weisberg.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:35:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55E9FF92.7050002@Weisberg.com> (Len Weisberg's message of "Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:31:14 -0700") Message-ID: <87ftmkfzky.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Len Weisberg writes: > Just as stated in the subject: > emacs 24.3; Buffer-menu-unmark fails to unmark a Save request > > Here is a fixed version (adding the second tabulated-list-set-col ) : > > (defun Buffer-menu-unmark [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21418 Cc: 21418@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Len Weisberg writes: > Just as stated in the subject: > emacs 24.3; Buffer-menu-unmark fails to unmark a Save request > > Here is a fixed version (adding the second tabulated-list-set-col ) : > > (defun Buffer-menu-unmark (&optional backup) > "Cancel all requested operations on buffer on this line and move down. > Optional prefix arg means move up." > (interactive "P") > (tabulated-list-set-col 0 " " t) > (tabulated-list-set-col 2 > (if (buffer-modified-p (Buffer-menu-buffer)) "*" " ") t) > (forward-line (if backup -1 1))) (I'm going through old bug reports that have unfortunately not gotten any responses.) Looks like this was fixed in commit cf59e41cd43, so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 15:36:08 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 19:36:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55313 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htGrw-0002d6-6F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:36:08 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:44972) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htGru-0002cy-Sm for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:36:07 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htGrs-0003Fq-6B for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:36:06 +0200 Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:36:03 +0200 Message-Id: <87ef24fzks.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #21418 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 21418 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 21418 quit From unknown Sun Jun 22 20:59:07 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator