GNU bug report logs - #21399
Emacs: Guix Package Info omits some inputs

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Subject: bug#21399: closed (Re: bug#21399: Emacs: Guix Package Info omits
 some inputs)
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 14:12:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#21399: Emacs: Guix Package Info omits some inputs

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 21399 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
21399: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21399
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Alex Kost <alezost <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 21399-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21399: Emacs: Guix Package Info omits some inputs
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:11:15 +0200

Alex Kost <alezost <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès (2015-09-03 17:41 +0300) wrote:
>
>>> From ae9203234d5254a9cb6a8127d31e99289c605f7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Alex Kost <alezost <at> gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 17:57:58 +0300
>>> Subject: [PATCH] emacs: Add support for "triplet" package inputs.
>>>
>>> Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/21399>.
>>>
>>> * emacs/guix-main.scm (full-name->name+version): Adjust to handle
>>>   "name-version:output" string.
>>>   (package-inputs-names): Support ("name" package "output") inputs.
>>
>> LGTM, thanks for the quick fix!
>
> The commit pushed, thank you.  So I think this bug may be closed.

Yep, thanks.

Ludo’.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Cc: Alex Kost <alezost <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Emacs: Guix Package Info omits some inputs
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:06:00 +0200

Hello,

For ‘r’, the *Guix Package Info* buffer omits IcedTea from the set of
inputs.  It shows this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Inputs            : openblas-0.2.14, cairo-1.14.2, gfortran-4.9.3, icu4c-55.1,
                    lapack-3.5.0, libjpeg-9a, libpng-1.5.21, libtiff-4.0.3,
                    libxt-1.1.4, pcre-8.37, readline-6.3, zlib-1.2.7
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

whereas the recipe has this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
    (inputs
     `(("openblas" ,openblas)
       ("cairo" ,cairo)
       ("gfortran" ,gfortran)
       ("icu4c" ,icu4c)
       ("icedtea6" ,icedtea6 "jdk")
       ("lapack" ,lapack)
       ("libjpeg" ,libjpeg)
       ("libpng" ,libpng)
       ("libtiff" ,libtiff)
       ("libxt" ,libxt)
       ("pcre" ,pcre)
       ("readline" ,readline)
       ("zlib" ,zlib)))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

My guess is that somewhere, the triplet for IcedTea is silently filtered
out.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.