From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:00 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#21338: 25.0.50; 25.0.50; forward-symbol works improperly for Elisp ?\( Resent-From: Oleh Krehel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 21338 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 21338@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.144042441627338 (code B ref -1); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:54:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2015 13:53:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36635 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTsBs-00076s-Gs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:53:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTsBq-00076k-NP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:53:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTsBp-0007dB-ST for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:56766) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTsBp-0007d5-PX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:53:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTsBo-0008JU-S2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:53:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTsBk-0007a9-MJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:53:32 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:37869) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTsBk-0007Zi-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:53:28 -0400 Received: by widdq5 with SMTP id dq5so72965743wid.0 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 06:53:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=hnINPLVPTSinoe+NfWAxKwdvze4XI7TM0GH7nsrijjY=; b=G2uo5eDfs/K4d/kB273HZnGu6b1k5JHyFMBt8wt2pPcLZVzKlGQ3zvJRWExYla4p8U ACtsK7r0tGR+VnNbBDbxqafH9pRZUoC3pEqzh1GOSA/ZByKBxmcmNklOEgC2brswi3KZ +Uw5lBxS0I52J/0wJlvGUBdxfsblQyCeVxvXdRAKVVFLHZvVMbZm+B2kCa9xJY8i1hdk NFf6tvPz+eVaAPsJ8UCua52iXgmr6L2Jx8H6jAXk7FMTHpSa1jnt/0NpoFKP9rzitvKb rZQF1zzH2J8g/jd5HPoyMRuF8xOKDhzoDNHlnbx6wnW29AhwTI+DbJMozMlZ6SC6tIRi +IvQ== X-Received: by 10.180.211.168 with SMTP id nd8mr30349598wic.23.1440424407386; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 06:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firefly (dyn069045.nbw.tue.nl. [131.155.69.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k12sm23400963wjw.4.2015.08.24.06.53.26 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 06:53:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Oleh Krehel Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 15:54:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87pp2cyepk.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) For example, starting with an Elisp buffer "|?\(", where "|" is the point, I would expect (forward-symbol 1) to change the buffer to "?\(|". Instead, it ends up as "?|\(". This also affects the result of (bounds-of-thing-at-point 'symbol) for the above construct. Note that `forward-symbol' works correctly when there is no backslash, e.g. for "|?a". From unknown Mon Jun 23 18:33:00 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#21338: 25.0.50; 25.0.50; forward-symbol works improperly for Elisp ?\( Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 19:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21338 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Oleh Krehel Cc: 21338@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 21338-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21338.156468883719064 (code B ref 21338); Thu, 01 Aug 2019 19:48:02 +0000 Received: (at 21338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 19:47:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55342 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htH2j-0004xB-CD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:47:17 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45152) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htH2g-0004ua-O8 for 21338@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:47:16 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htH2d-0003Lc-4P; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:47:13 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87pp2cyepk.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:47:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pp2cyepk.fsf@gmail.com> (Oleh Krehel's message of "Mon, 24 Aug 2015 15:54:15 +0200") Message-ID: <87zhksekht.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Oleh Krehel writes: > For example, starting with an Elisp buffer "|?\(", where "|" is the > point, I would expect (forward-symbol 1) to change the buffer to "?\(|". > Instead, it ends up as "?|\(". Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Oleh Krehel writes: > For example, starting with an Elisp buffer "|?\(", where "|" is the > point, I would expect (forward-symbol 1) to change the buffer to "?\(|". > Instead, it ends up as "?|\(". (I'm going through old bug reports that have unfortunately not gotten any responses.) I'm unable to reproduce this bug in Emacs 27, so I'm guessing this has been fixed during the intervening years. I'm closing the bug report; please reopen if this bug is still present. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 15:47:22 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 19:47:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55345 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htH2n-00050a-M7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:47:22 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45166) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htH2m-0004zF-4x for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 15:47:20 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htH2j-0003Lj-Fg for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:47:19 +0200 Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 21:47:16 +0200 Message-Id: <87y30cekhn.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #21338 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 21338 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 21338 quit