From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 17 14:07:20 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Aug 2015 18:07:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58300 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZROoZ-0001op-SF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:07:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47126) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZROoX-0001oh-QE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:07:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZROoR-0005Wr-K2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:07:17 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:33863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZROoR-0005Wg-BJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:07:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRO9v-0001Bx-TM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:25:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRO9r-000149-RE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:25:19 -0400 Received: from cobb.liquidweb.com ([50.28.13.150]:34703) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRO9r-00012K-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:25:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lawlist.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date; bh=kqslHvK7GE906qF8jN+ZA/ivYdeQ9cJ4A1aP8VBGmbI=; b=lT82n40rZ3P+VZ3FkMSdq97b9tA7zJg2QEkm5YA8wU9pGa5yPel3dgwCcG5M6iPUA8gLXNrrCtQ6W2juRKOkK6uGH9T17935TzPECdUkHsjwLIv3BTvHOlyDjxSQ0/4Y; Received: from cpe-45-48-239-195.socal.res.rr.com ([45.48.239.195]:50794 helo=server.local.localhost) by cobb.liquidweb.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRO9p-0005mS-8i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:25:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:25:13 -0700 Message-ID: From: Keith David Bershatsky To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.0.50; `completion-file-name-table' should/not use `nreverse'? MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by - "") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cobb.liquidweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - lawlist.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cobb.liquidweb.com: acl_c_relayhosts_text_entry: lawlist|lawlist.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) The function `completion-file-name-table' uses `(setq all (nreverse comp))' instead of `(setq all comp)'. This has the effect of reversing what was accomplished when `pcomplete-compare-entry-function' is set to `'string-lessp'. In a nutshell, the completions are in reverse alphabetical order as a result of `(setq all (nreverse comp))'. This was tested in an eshell buffer by typing at a prompt: rm [space tab]; and, with `lawlist-eshell-cmpl-compare-entry-function` set to `'string-lessp'. Thanks, Keith ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; In GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0, NS appkit-1038.36 Version 10.6.8 (Build 10K549)) of 2015-08-15 on server.local Repository revision: 118363 mina86@mina86.com-20141117204835-paxrwolqd1cgwtdp Windowing system distributor `Apple', version 10.3.1038 Configured using: `configure --with-ns --without-imagemagick' Configured features: ACL LIBXML2 ZLIB Important settings: locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix Major mode: ELISP Minor modes in effect: tb-mode: t sb-mode: t ml-mode: t fl-mode: t ds-mode: t sd-mode: t bc-mode: t +-mode: t buffer-read-only: t Recent messages: Wrote /Users/HOME/.0.data/.0.emacs/.lock Emacs: completion-file-name-table Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow emacsbug sendmail lawlist-ztree lawlist-yas lawlist-ws lawlist-wl elmo-imap4 elmo-localdir modb-standard modb-legacy elmo-internal elmo-flag mmelmo-imap mmelmo-buffer elsp-generic mel-u ps-print ps-def lpr parse-time enriched lawlist-w3m browse-url doc-view image-mode ccl lawlist-vl lawlist-view lawlist-undo lawlist-txt lawlist-tm lawlist-tex compare-w lawlist-tabbar lawlist-speedbar lawlist-shell info esh-groups ehelp ange-ftp lawlist-sgml lawlist-sb lawlist-saveplace lawlist-ruler mule-util lawlist-replace lawlist-rectangle lawlist-re-builder lawlist-python skeleton lawlist-profiler lawlist-print lawlist-php lawlist-perl lawlist-parens lawlist-org lawlist-calendar org-agenda org org-macro org-footnote org-pcomplete org-list org-faces org-entities org-version ob-emacs-lisp ob ob-tangle ob-ref ob-lob ob-table ob-exp org-src ob-keys ob-comint ob-core ob-eval org-compat org-macs org-loaddefs holidays hol-loaddefs cal-menu calendar cal-loaddefs lawlist-neotree lawlist-movement lawlist-mouse lawlist-ml lawlist-minibuffer lawlist-misc lawlist-messages lawlist-mc rect lawlist-markdown noutline outline lawlist-lorem lawlist-ln lawlist-keymap lawlist-js lawlist-ispell lawlist-isearch lawlist-imenu lawlist-ibuffer lawlist-hl lawlist-grep lawlist-git ido view vc-git vc vc-dispatcher url-http tls url url-proxy url-privacy url-expand url-methods url-history mailcap url-auth url-cookie url-domsuf url-gw thingatpt time-stamp server log-view log-edit message mml mml-sec mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode gmm-utils mailheader pcvs-util add-log lawlist-help quail help-mode json grep compile find-lisp ediff-merg ediff-wind ediff-diff ediff-mult ediff-help ediff-init ediff-util ediff ert find-func ewoc eieio-base diff-mode conf-mode autorevert filenotify lawlist-frame lawlist-frame-bufs lawlist-font-lock lawlist-fm lawlist-env lawlist-elscreen lawlist-elisp lawlist-dv jka-compr lawlist-image lawlist-files zeroconf url-util url-parse auth-source eieio byte-opt bytecomp byte-compile cl-extra cconv eieio-core password-cache url-vars dbus xml lawlist-ds lawlist-dired epa epg epg-config format-spec edmacro kmacro dired lawlist-desktop frameset lawlist-debug lawlist-window debug lawlist-css smie lawlist-compile rx lawlist-color lawlist-cm pcase lawlist-cc cc-langs cc-mode cc-fonts cc-guess cc-menus cc-cmds cc-styles cc-align cc-engine cc-vars cc-defs cc-bytecomp lawlist-calc lawlist-calccomp lawlist-calcalg3 lawlist-calcalg2 lawlist-calc+ easymenu lawlist-bk lawlist-bc lawlist-bbdb gnus gnus-ems nnheader gnus-util mail-utils wid-edit mail-parse rfc2231 rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mailabbrev mail-extr rfc822 cl timezone lawlist-as lawlist-archive cl-macs gv cl-loaddefs cl-lib lawlist-+ disp-table easy-mmode derived advice help-fns shell pcomplete comint ansi-color ring savehist time-date tooltip eldoc electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel ns-win tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list newcomment elisp-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev minibuffer nadvice loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process cocoa ns multi-tty emacs) Memory information: ((conses 16 2078627 153097) (symbols 48 83114 0) (miscs 40 560 467) (strings 32 191705 23218) (string-bytes 1 6865927) (vectors 16 40524) (vector-slots 8 960694 10088) (floats 8 2574 897) (intervals 56 730 61) (buffers 976 12)) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 04 03:40:06 2016 Received: (at 21284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2016 07:40:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36318 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axrPh-0007aF-Sp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 03:40:06 -0400 Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:59006) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axrPf-0007a5-Ql for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 03:40:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28143B32251; Wed, 4 May 2016 09:40:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gP8nwmzI4ani; Wed, 4 May 2016 09:40:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (98-171.echostar.pl [213.156.98.171]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88ECCB3224F; Wed, 4 May 2016 09:40:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Marcin Borkowski To: Keith David Bershatsky Subject: Re: bug#21284: 25.0.50; `completion-file-name-table' should/not use `nreverse'? References: Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 09:40:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Keith David Bershatsky's message of "Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:25:13 -0700") Message-ID: <87wpnaxodr.fsf@mbork.pl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21284 Cc: 21284@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On 2015-08-17, at 10:25, Keith David Bershatsky wrote: > The function `completion-file-name-table' uses `(setq all (nreverse comp))' instead of `(setq all comp)'. > > This has the effect of reversing what was accomplished when `pcomplete-compare-entry-function' is set to `'string-lessp'. > > In a nutshell, the completions are in reverse alphabetical order as a result of `(setq all (nreverse comp))'. > > This was tested in an eshell buffer by typing at a prompt: rm [space tab]; and, with `lawlist-eshell-cmpl-compare-entry-function` set to `'string-lessp'. Hi, I tried to reproduce it on GNU Emacs 25.1.50.9 (commit fafdfcb) and failed. However, I'm not sure whether I understood your report correctly. My Emacs doesn't seem to have `lawlist-eshell-cmpl-compare-entry-function', only `eshell-cmpl-compare-entry-function'. Did you mean that variable? I tried to set it to `'string-lessp', but nothing seemed to change after "rm [space] [tab]" in Eshell. > Thanks, > > Keith Best, -- Marcin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 04 14:14:16 2016 Received: (at 21284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2016 18:14:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38157 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ay1JQ-0005KN-E5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 14:14:16 -0400 Received: from cobb.liquidweb.com ([50.28.13.150]:34715) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ay1JN-0005K1-Fl for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 14:14:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lawlist.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:Cc:To:From:Message-ID:Date; bh=rqbE2TFPpjfR9LZePOjLkaUdCSYLtSRkcl56LYOrUtw=; b=NRQPqB2kLHthui8MjVqZYX1Gl4mz8Nojf1KJna5im+eaYXhxUzWtlbMTNnKwivPT1fjJGd8Ix87/HeTByincdWu1iWHtUHmKd8ABHlV75uKNDZLYF70jeXA8gPbE8kgW; Received: from cpe-45-48-239-195.socal.res.rr.com ([45.48.239.195]:49212 helo=mb.local.localhost) by cobb.liquidweb.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ay1JE-0001Lc-TB; Wed, 04 May 2016 14:14:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 11:14:06 -0700 Message-ID: From: Keith David Bershatsky To: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: bug#21284: 25.0.50; `completion-file-name-table' should/not use `nreverse'? MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by - "") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cobb.liquidweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - lawlist.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cobb.liquidweb.com: acl_c_relayhosts_text_entry: lawlist|lawlist.com X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21284 Cc: 21284@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Thank you, Marcin, for taking a look at 21284. I apologize for mislabeling the variable. It turns out that the same erroneous behavior is observable with Emacs -Q. The `*Completions*` are in reverse alphabetical order. Step 1: Launch the graphical version of Emacs -Q. Step 2: M-x eshell Step 3: cd to a directory containing files and folders with a variety of different names beginning with letters a to z. Step 4: type rm Step 5: hit the space bar Step 6: hit the tab key Step 7: The *Completions* are in reverse alphabetical order. Thanks, Keith ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; > Hi, > > I tried to reproduce it on GNU Emacs 25.1.50.9 (commit fafdfcb) and > failed. However, I'm not sure whether I understood your report > correctly. My Emacs doesn't seem to have > `lawlist-eshell-cmpl-compare-entry-function', only > `eshell-cmpl-compare-entry-function'. Did you mean that variable? > I tried to set it to `'string-lessp', but nothing seemed to change after > "rm [space] [tab]" in Eshell. > > > Thanks, > > > > Keith > > Best, > > -- > Marcin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 05 22:50:18 2016 Received: (at 21284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2016 02:50:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56074 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9kcM-0000wM-9J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 22:50:18 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:33022) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9kcK-0000w8-9A for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 22:50:16 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id k23so206693904oih.0 for <21284@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 19:50:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xB78X4r9a51iIw7UESZa1IYdcgBmoFe6UAMTwydBG3U=; b=D24KYJUup0KXMBWRzZ7cvsO5ea4W3oUCUZQpwVGwlaBWqKok91wVkPfxsCoBZTqj2g yVAanRfRqllwxIi4W2/OwkwwwN1EmtUxfGfhQmpJt7MW4I8/SX8QECogPJErcgE33TX9 8GxEd1YM88I5CQsaa9BjeTLDlOOznsmTtunAf73+0X6iWva2m9hiAm3ycSpeHvAmobMN 5KYjdljcS0mLGG2y/m/qKomxcNwu8Hb6vsM4wikIm7+aaymVRo26hClSZXfjDooskLuB 6pBXtyUYc7XZvsxpml21E2dRs9MyIL54tqLzaPKK1s2Oh17UvLL4awEdUrqVrKwzXijN kFYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to:cc; bh=xB78X4r9a51iIw7UESZa1IYdcgBmoFe6UAMTwydBG3U=; b=Pwg47nz+h/qMdV4B4Mdq4cGs20O/JTTErftBey1Chcm77kXKMNzTelbkIkKSVq3G2W z1+YSGRStVmAAZ7Tg08ALiwgOjiawte78PhVbS2OyTQEQzOy0jUAr4uk23JoSYKf/EGZ WbcCw3ovqlresfHHCeCxZ2d17TuEAas4KP5uJNKKzjLKrvsac3xsLETlVLnBYbVjCpGV oq8JXj4aYCgfGYU1TmUcVfISpTvpro0aG7Oo4VCKEDhRYFsD8oDayzXvGZ7PEOAUFU+M IpA/i20Cu3U4ka6A8i9t1WiIgA5xoQXUB5Lj2+a1IBi96sqfBtrexTeTFdVFXSRUSJFe qlew== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLyO49o7Tx28RPOo+TYVQMRsresC6pOsyx5G3MsrryZ0AD4phyFiRZfHps69r0qVlmc/MkytCK/WPW/Tg== X-Received: by 10.157.1.11 with SMTP id 11mr7829794otu.17.1465181410640; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 19:50:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.5.168 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 19:50:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:50:10 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3ry3qBk6TSD8_MmVQ6i4b16p4hE Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#21284: 25.0.50; `completion-file-name-table' should/not use `nreverse'? To: 21284@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21284 Cc: Keith David Bershatsky , Marcin Borkowski X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) tag 21284 unreproducible quit I'm getting completions in what looks like a random order, here are the first few lines for completions in the emacs src directory: Possible completions are: undo.o ChangeLog.12 eval.o insdel.o xfaces.o sysdep.o category.o marker.o search.c ChangeLog.10 fontset.o dynlib.h kqueue.c deps/ lastfile.o dired.o insdel.c w32fns.c textprop.o xselect.c inotify.c doprnt.c cmds.c xdisp.c data.o fontset.c xsettings.h character.o keymap.c xsettings.o emacsgtkfixed.h systime.h syntax.h bytecode.o character.h deps.mk From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 06 10:43:34 2016 Received: (at 21284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2016 14:43:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56878 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9vkb-00081k-PN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:43:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45372) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9vkZ-00081X-8H for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:43:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9vkP-0007ry-4e for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:43:26 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9vjd-0007Rq-99; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:42:33 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4029 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b9vjb-0005Zx-5i; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:42:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 17:43:04 +0300 Message-Id: <83mvmytm2v.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Noam Postavsky In-reply-to: (message from Noam Postavsky on Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:50:10 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#21284: 25.0.50; `completion-file-name-table' should/not use `nreverse'? References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21284 Cc: mbork@mbork.pl, esq@lawlist.com, 21284@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:50:10 -0400 > Cc: Keith David Bershatsky , Marcin Borkowski > I'm getting completions in what looks like a random order, here are > the first few lines for completions in the emacs src directory: I suspect that there's a hidden factor here: the order in which the 'readdir' libc function returns the directory entries. On GNU/Linux, the order is arbitrary (AFAIK, it's the order of the entries in the directory file). On MS-Windows, the order is alphabetic, so reversing will produce the reverse alphabetic order. I don't know what happens on OS X. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 06 12:19:20 2016 Received: (at 21284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2016 16:19:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56940 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xFI-0001pD-CE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:19:20 -0400 Received: from black.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.19]:43811 helo=gt-egress-001.mailchannels.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xFG-0001p3-60 for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:19:18 -0400 X-Sender-Id: _forwarded-from|45.48.239.195 Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1437100416; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cobb.liquidweb.com (ip-10-213-0-221.us-west-2.compute.internal [10.213.0.221]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 68ADB100232; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:19:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: _forwarded-from|45.48.239.195 Received: from cobb.liquidweb.com (cobb.liquidweb.com [10.29.31.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.6.14); Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:19:12 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Forwarding X-MailChannels-SenderId: _forwarded-from|45.48.239.195 X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: liquidweb X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1465229952063:290580071 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1465229952063 Received: from cpe-45-48-239-195.socal.res.rr.com ([45.48.239.195]:49641 helo=server.local.localhost) by cobb.liquidweb.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xF7-00082c-Mg; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:19:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 09:19:07 -0700 Message-ID: From: Keith David Bershatsky To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#21284: 25.0.50; `completion-file-name-table' should/not use `nreverse'? MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by - "") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-AuthUser: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21284 Cc: Marcin Borkowski , 21284@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) I am on OS X and the default sort order is alphabetic, which gets reversed by `completion-file-name-table` because it uses `nreverse'. Keith At Mon, 06 Jun 2016 17:43:04 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > . . . > > I suspect that there's a hidden factor here: the order in which the > 'readdir' libc function returns the directory entries. On GNU/Linux, > the order is arbitrary (AFAIK, it's the order of the entries in the > directory file). On MS-Windows, the order is alphabetic, so reversing > will produce the reverse alphabetic order. I don't know what happens > on OS X. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 06 14:52:32 2016 Received: (at 21284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2016 18:52:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57026 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zdY-00076o-Aa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:52:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38769) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zdX-00076d-EB for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:52:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zdO-0002Qn-Ea for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:52:26 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zce-0002IM-71; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:51:36 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4143 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b9zcY-0003os-Mv; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:51:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 21:50:05 +0300 Message-Id: <8337oqtan6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Keith David Bershatsky In-reply-to: (message from Keith David Bershatsky on Mon, 06 Jun 2016 09:19:07 -0700) Subject: Re: bug#21284: 25.0.50; `completion-file-name-table' should/not use `nreverse'? References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21284 Cc: mbork@mbork.pl, 21284@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) > Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 09:19:07 -0700 > From: Keith David Bershatsky > Cc: 21284@debbugs.gnu.org,Noam Postavsky ,Marcin Borkowski > > I am on OS X and the default sort order is alphabetic, which gets reversed by `completion-file-name-table` because it uses `nreverse'. Then what exactly is the problem here? Emacs doesn't know in what order the files are returned, it considers the order random. Reversing a randomly ordered list produces another randomly ordered list. Applications that need to present the list in some specific order need to do that explicitly. For example, "C-x C-f TAB TAB" does display the files in alphabetic order for me, not in reverse alphabetic order. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 06 16:00:59 2016 Received: (at 21284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2016 20:00:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57079 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bA0hn-0000HB-Jc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:00:59 -0400 Received: from beige.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.16]:54643 helo=gt-egress-001.mailchannels.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bA0hl-0000H1-IJ for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:00:58 -0400 X-Sender-Id: _forwarded-from|45.48.239.195 Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF214122253; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 20:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cobb.liquidweb.com (ip-10-123-105-117.us-west-2.compute.internal [10.123.105.117]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4645B121B1C; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 20:00:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: _forwarded-from|45.48.239.195 Received: from cobb.liquidweb.com (cobb.liquidweb.com [10.135.9.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.6.14); Mon, 06 Jun 2016 20:00:45 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Forwarding X-MailChannels-SenderId: _forwarded-from|45.48.239.195 X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: liquidweb X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1465243273573:3205704977 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1465243273573 Received: from cpe-45-48-239-195.socal.res.rr.com ([45.48.239.195]:51977 helo=server.local.localhost) by cobb.liquidweb.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bA0hU-0006eB-9K; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:00:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 13:00:40 -0700 Message-ID: From: Keith David Bershatsky To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#21284: 25.0.50; `completion-file-name-table' should/not use `nreverse'? MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by - "") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-AuthUser: X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21284 Cc: Marcin Borkowski , 21284@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) If there is/are valid reason(s) to reverse the order, then perhaps consider mentioning one or more of those reasons in a comment within `completion-file-name-table' along with a mention of bug 21284. If there is no valid reason whatsoever to reverse the order, then perhaps consider removing `nreverse` from `completion-file-name-table`. If the issue is "de minimus", then the bug report can be closed without further ado. Keith At Mon, 06 Jun 2016 21:50:05 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > . . . > > Then what exactly is the problem here? Emacs doesn't know in what > order the files are returned, it considers the order random. > Reversing a randomly ordered list produces another randomly ordered > list. Applications that need to present the list in some specific > order need to do that explicitly. For example, "C-x C-f TAB TAB" does > display the files in alphabetic order for me, not in reverse > alphabetic order. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 06 19:12:09 2016 Received: (at 21284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2016 23:12:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57181 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bA3gn-0004nO-EU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 19:12:09 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]:33021) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bA3gl-0004n3-Mf for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 19:12:07 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f44.google.com with SMTP id k23so250577175oih.0 for <21284@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:12:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=+eL20m+Yfo7bpceJ4Kdv/HvwQDXHx2TZK+TUeTFKYU8=; b=yrBq6bjBBIapO5dJ8MM68sPmDUNm08XTlCkaq1x3Z3789qHNBVqThr8cMP7EBzcYmA TOhh4evR+DzBbX7xrLSWi//tcm8ijVNqT3hXk7KrQjTCDe59wy2Xz1HD6AyN0xYRVvbw AQWCiW+5ke2BFGA+UwcfU36PnGxlxkhkg4ajONKUrgF9woeA0Ap1gKUt5GaVNta4TKCb TwBQbxRijL5723pFeod3R2fM3699ft+xiw1FBL7QMJ0s/FfyjetHROJlylG/UYvUxVsq WOzlThW4+/CVlBqMEOYgTPAd5mRsjJ5V8t3o09YpaEr2HY6FDpgeZmXO2aMP1PT0wqEW X60Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+eL20m+Yfo7bpceJ4Kdv/HvwQDXHx2TZK+TUeTFKYU8=; b=Ik0D1ZPS8WaCtMEu9Gk7bLCU81O9SI+QJnhrue3INthKWJHK8Bda86spwrLA6NnMt0 uOyVF5HEOlsNJWDspB3Bvcw6eY0pG88mT4Liti7H3bWjPK5my8bvYW7vQ/JntcYZOTjc JN5BP9n0dE7RihI0dfUvoPu3DwQb1orDCnuikk4mn8eFgD6ku8OTLJlFhE7VvNWp2wgj MejCCV4Wkvpry/hZzfMOvOKR7mJObg8EyPHp1jhtddyiD0GYwuPb8akiqwuhmMEVlQU9 aex6p8dIrKE7eQVX3D8HYFEl7xGGlK6fDhUcoC6EpdRhT7jB5SXswkK52Dy3ihbaNlaX E+0w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKDHJUu9AG1qET8xqokYTamewuoDs+EI6aXBXwHtip/czmjm+xdbT1N+jDvXWf8othaNBdPNRKc/QoA3w== X-Received: by 10.157.51.74 with SMTP id u10mr10555360otd.124.1465254721892; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:12:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.5.168 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:12:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83mvmytm2v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mvmytm2v.fsf@gnu.org> From: Noam Postavsky Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:12:01 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: G4OypX8s8AaK35_2AYb-Ic1XSg0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#21284: 25.0.50; `completion-file-name-table' should/not use `nreverse'? To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21284 Cc: Marcin Borkowski , Keith David Bershatsky , 21284@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) tag 21284 - unreproducible severity 21284 minor quit On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I suspect that there's a hidden factor here: the order in which the > 'readdir' libc function returns the directory entries. On GNU/Linux, > the order is arbitrary (AFAIK, it's the order of the entries in the > directory file). On MS-Windows, the order is alphabetic, so reversing > will produce the reverse alphabetic order. I don't know what happens > on OS X. Oh yeah, I see reversed order on Windows. On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Keith David Bershatsky wrote: > I am on OS X and the default sort order is alphabetic, which gets reversed by `completion-file-name-table` because it uses `nreverse'. Actually, the result from `file-name-all-completions` is already reversed. `completion-file-name-table` then reverses it twice: once in the loop (dolist (tem all) (... (push tem comp))), and the `nreverse` call to undo it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 06 22:36:52 2016 Received: (at 21284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jun 2016 02:36:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57318 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bA6su-000605-Cm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:36:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48354) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bA6ss-0005zs-75 for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:36:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bA6si-0000cP-3d for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:36:44 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bA6s1-0000Xm-Kh; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:35:57 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4345 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bA6rz-0000RD-Ik; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:35:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 05:36:30 +0300 Message-Id: <83shwpsp1t.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Keith David Bershatsky In-reply-to: (message from Keith David Bershatsky on Mon, 06 Jun 2016 13:00:40 -0700) Subject: Re: bug#21284: 25.0.50; `completion-file-name-table' should/not use `nreverse'? References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21284 Cc: mbork@mbork.pl, 21284@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) > Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 13:00:40 -0700 > From: Keith David Bershatsky > Cc: 21284@debbugs.gnu.org,Marcin Borkowski ,Noam Postavsky > > If there is/are valid reason(s) to reverse the order, then perhaps consider mentioning one or more of those reasons in a comment within `completion-file-name-table' along with a mention of bug 21284. > > If there is no valid reason whatsoever to reverse the order, then perhaps consider removing `nreverse` from `completion-file-name-table`. > > If the issue is "de minimus", then the bug report can be closed without further ado. I believe the reason is the usual one: we create the list by pushing each new element onto it, so the result comes in reverse order of the files. The call to nreverse then restores the original order. IOW, this is an implementation detail. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 07 22:43:18 2016 Received: (at 21284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jun 2016 02:43:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59346 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bATSf-0000d7-QA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 22:43:17 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com ([209.85.218.50]:34654) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bATSe-0000cu-G9 for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 22:43:16 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id e72so307226790oib.1 for <21284@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 19:43:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=jFStqwILnTA6PPFznsbhl+nT7dYmeiN55iFPZIRBL00=; b=pBTaMC4CBaLoQS2ecZyIn9qYRvmyDiOOdgMkS9CxNnJN8ShcscvaxsSKi4Qsf2tCWW WudIlCvVEcaG/oyGOhlyPT6I07AQ5LQfN3FX2LpuLgnitYBeiqslYuhjg4d8nBmOvbjQ VEV1R4Ue60nEyU8HuFT9d9GiBAL3ntgm2QfIIjKgHU2dgr6rZ8aMSJutO5GVgQmG9n9Y GQjwwpvhiQywQB11E6JzoRgg8DIn/yHqADau51IjhlEhUeY0zq3RFCUGnN1osHZbaCx6 mvfeA5d0eWdZ/3NwFH3/C4ya0/5OzKOHfdkvmMHydDlREDgnliB0ez/Uq16m6xX4AT/2 jnFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jFStqwILnTA6PPFznsbhl+nT7dYmeiN55iFPZIRBL00=; b=RAs5+f3Qg+Ko2OXXbQdaOb4+YIOVQKyewmcVeMf9EHig3ETpix1U9LNiU9lg6/Pf/G RUhpqgX4EB705wS5Zzr4qbXBCATPrBAKjpcH5WixM803uD1hd10+cuC47/SGqpTrmwVq FzYNba9SGOW5zp68uSCw36AhmEP9K/kimpE9MA0GnxCvHrSvbO+v7X/5BR8j853bVZco D9ge8phWsLP+UHkrWJnSPEOEZufY1HeXlGAIPzD6xaHm/dCIQo11R3g4QqLkT+dnkfgu nIvgdTbF1uq1MWoc4pyQ2DeS5FicIcNtvu4Gzvu4ac708RP79VpCmNh+5XEw5z6MJLo/ dgDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKjFrfqjStkO8IlHOdV0thWdLCZuyvTBx6V/oK68H1h1JCBrGMe86xb1ZsCptT7outMflp5LZHnCJAhxw== X-Received: by 10.202.245.196 with SMTP id t187mr1342792oih.178.1465353790727; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 19:43:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.5.168 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:43:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8337oqtan6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8337oqtan6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Noam Postavsky Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 22:43:10 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: VI5voEUGpIDcSlLTbl-H2HK4bUo Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#21284: 25.0.50; `completion-file-name-table' should/not use `nreverse'? To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21284 Cc: Marcin Borkowski , Keith David Bershatsky , 21284@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) retitle 21284 eshell does not sort completion candidates quit On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Then what exactly is the problem here? Emacs doesn't know in what > order the files are returned, it considers the order random. > Reversing a randomly ordered list produces another randomly ordered > list. Applications that need to present the list in some specific > order need to do that explicitly. For example, "C-x C-f TAB TAB" does > display the files in alphabetic order for me, not in reverse > alphabetic order. So the problem is that eshell's completion doesn't sort its candidates. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 02 01:22:20 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2017 05:22:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56301 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuXy0-0004T6-3u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 01:22:20 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]:35984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuXxy-0004Ss-QC for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 01:22:19 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e75so32043612itd.1 for ; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 22:22:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=UBJekVBk+Xy2zL03NXx/nlNX3YHW6oyaGDRxw5kIXRw=; b=hfz6nrbHnNkA1nyfOQH4a0dXSiFoZ6KUFMR9cWlO/2JMzO4HBrIaZAVGokY0pMgwq8 xpKXKvtBEYEzBtnEdR84O8LrzjVVN/jAp6gf8KZRjsvjBJax9RaPIW5IbRwjiaVtzI5o q8yDPqu1XtNS1f0JlN/q2U2e+VWeNsq3COyvWOuSz3TyHWd/K00V20zyoozcJ/Iwxv6b /30HboLCI4fhCD0lZfkRvZA+FHYicQw+PiF35Uhp6hI5HNIolgxHeDzqzIVJdwyzy9qA 3XTkMjLF3EJkqVokQZZm9adO8IUb5J/n0gklYsnC0rJDYcpBG4Xx8AHkwPvttd3aNnTh +5dQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=UBJekVBk+Xy2zL03NXx/nlNX3YHW6oyaGDRxw5kIXRw=; b=UU8vSqSUixzy7s6pHyCJsfOY5bzhz/qB6F2r3FAw4NFXBcUO85eIxOExrsqOLe7afs gjtEjjijykl2IHQBd40t59QPu+5drYJZH2uVUqI2hf7MUSidF+t78P3dxQOgB6YSS3Ey +ZFdGdZZmu3YwPTFaIOQUH1EEcadWgThQXEohVVo/wNMevvLSUB2Yt9FzGN3T+JdP6Q8 CyMN6lDPpusNkZfwHZce3suPHXmOcP7p0w1/CVTygIA3gZ6JoNylo3xUfYFfI6303ujK 5MA/1XZd2noUtdDZn9f+Nyk5rssVIuE9dFRuxD7icpbkIGdYiqgZLxm65lp7ZF+0teQr pyYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H03Q5z4fx8t3NJvXvhyTFKx2WTh2rewV6jJltvH0SOAfEgf/H34 FyzWPVYYSm/ocdJJyUg= X-Received: by 10.36.111.207 with SMTP id x198mr1262410itb.26.1491110533183; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 22:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x127sm3925170itg.26.2017.04.01.22.22.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 22:22:12 -0700 (PDT) From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #21284 Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 01:23:37 -0400 Message-ID: <87k273xu06.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) retitle 21284 eshell does not sort completion candidates quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 13 03:53:00 2022 Received: (at 21284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2022 08:53:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36268 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJAct-0008Eh-SI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 03:53:00 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50940) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJAcr-0008ER-Ss for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 03:52:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kytMNYBJYTIT8EkSpD10ewmv+KoiEfqTipfD8DqrDjg=; b=txuHUlYDKhe5rjAUH6botaGE5P KTWMJ0MnKJWaGFXtf9TAn55im0RWUTC4roFS6nJTIc9sqJdtRYPH2jasBwVYaxHmTq/gJw1CI/FZC XdP9EYwlcyWrsnLsicAXf1MEJeYmnwMzXmMpJiLqmJMPzQC7FRBaheFrD6+VEaiV0lF0=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nJAcf-0000uc-8w; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 09:52:47 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Keith David Bershatsky Subject: Re: bug#21284: eshell does not sort completion candidates References: X-Now-Playing: Nils Petter =?utf-8?Q?Molv=C3=A6r's?= _Solid Ether_: "Dead Indeed" Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 09:52:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Keith David Bershatsky's message of "Wed, 04 May 2016 11:14:06 -0700") Message-ID: <87v8xjxi5f.fsf_-_@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Keith David Bershatsky writes: > Step 1: Launch the graphical version of Emacs -Q. > > Step 2: M-x eshell > > Step 3: cd to a directory containing files and folders with a variety > of different names beginning with letters a to z. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21284 Cc: 21284@debbugs.gnu.org, Marcin Borkowski X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Keith David Bershatsky writes: > Step 1: Launch the graphical version of Emacs -Q. > > Step 2: M-x eshell > > Step 3: cd to a directory containing files and folders with a variety > of different names beginning with letters a to z. > > Step 4: type rm > > Step 5: hit the space bar > > Step 6: hit the tab key > > Step 7: The *Completions* are in reverse alphabetical order. (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) I tried to reproduce this in Emacs 29, but was unable to. Are you still seeing this problem in recent Emacs versions? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 13 03:53:03 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2022 08:53:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36272 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJAcx-0008FL-2j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 03:53:03 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50964) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nJAcv-0008EV-ET for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 03:53:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pHuUnUKsp7Co15WfLQt693UDYsv/c9F/TP73nR+PnhY=; b=IAs/fkyRqSy2KYAq95c5cEr6ug 5s4cKLF9uq6U4/7Q6HcdVzozSUflRcKCndeFIO2LbC97pe6lv8oBlQDl7pqdDnjucyl0R3GASXUcc 24dzGqV2QlHJ4SRbVlfqzKUoRgVjl1sbKN7SRNTmXLu+YgMMaYZAJpvp4lArGP1JMHgQ=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nJAcn-0000uj-Fl for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 09:52:55 +0100 Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 09:52:49 +0100 Message-Id: <87tud3xi5a.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #21284 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 21284 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 21284 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 14 06:34:03 2022 Received: (at 21284) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2022 10:34:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTi1b-0000A4-44 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 06:34:03 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41278) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTi1Z-000095-57 for 21284@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 06:34:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=i3aMU5Rr7uiUPtpNnSJfH/eIJniWwWviK/i7dnLWTx8=; b=gWpZMnUlcM1fVsqkyzNgIaUZ1G ArtVCfQIGgCeZuCUh8AXOohHncu3Q5T/4sFJGgKDU/owg2VG0goe8QMeL2MmSIsGdXLK16duJdU7E YLvW0kAaud1EzkYJeocAj3ySADXYByNGjPogbikfnUSF31ydWQ1gxnfK5i8kbnm5HrEk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nTi1M-0005PU-CJ; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:33:50 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Keith David Bershatsky Subject: Re: bug#21284: eshell does not sort completion candidates References: <87v8xjxi5f.fsf_-_@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Colored Music's _Individual Beauty_: "Love Season" Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:33:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87v8xjxi5f.fsf_-_@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2022 09:52:44 +0100") Message-ID: <87tuc0ygac.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I tried to reproduce this in Emacs 29, but was unable to. Are you still > seeing this problem in recent Emacs versions? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21284 Cc: Marcin Borkowski , 21284@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I tried to reproduce this in Emacs 29, but was unable to. Are you still > seeing this problem in recent Emacs versions? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 14 06:34:03 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2022 10:34:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44168 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTi1b-0000A6-9w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 06:34:03 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41280) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTi1Z-000096-J2 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 06:34:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MTn4vy0bSwkUj/frlulrWzUEJ+Rt+4VEGKx8ibacylQ=; b=UD8wfjlnU5OEtcFlceiI/hvanB tK3uuBtEOL21NvKNY9FxMPtncKSHkH47BLs9UGh//d+r59kmcso+J5UaH0yfW/wKq2eapfPUVMM6F JOiUoFhEam0nErJl1xDvfe9PQAfcVRGPiD5gWm7JRZWzG8vGw/gmohyN8XVFZNcTeziU=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nTi1R-0005Pa-Pz for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:33:55 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:33:52 +0100 Message-Id: <87sfrkyga7.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #21284 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 21284 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 21284 quit From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:04:07 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator