GNU bug report logs - #21218
ls -d

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: "Sneeh, Eddie" <eddie.sneeh <at> roche.com>
Subject: bug#21218: closed (Re: bug#21218: ls -d)
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 03:44:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#21218: ls -d

which was filed against the coreutils package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 21218 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
21218: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21218
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: "Sneeh, Eddie" <eddie.sneeh <at> roche.com>, 21218-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21218: ls -d
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 21:43:30 -0600

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

tag 21218 notabug
thanks

On 08/07/2015 06:01 PM, Sneeh, Eddie wrote:
> Hi,
> I believe there is a problem with ls -d (unless the intent is to just list
> 1 directory).

Thanks for the report.  However, I think you have misunderstood the
purpose of -d.  Try this for comparison:

touch file
ls . file
ls -d . file

All -d does is to list command line arguments that are directories as
the name of the directory itself, rather than descending and showing the
directory's contents.

> Say I have a dir mydir, it has directories d1 and d2, and files f1 and f2.
> I want to list only d1 and d2.  How do I do that?  I tried ls -d but that
> doesn't seem to work:
> \ls -d mydir
> returns: mydir
> \ls -d mydir/*
> returns: mydir/d1 mydir/d2 mydir/f1 mydir/f2
> but f1 and f2 are files.

If you want to list ONLY directories, use a glob that guarantees only
directories can be matched:

ls -d mydir/*/

The trailing slash can only match directories, and will therefore skip
ordinary files.  Or, you can use find:

find mydir -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 2 -type d

I'm closing this as not a bug as ls is working as designed, but feel
free to ask further questions.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: "Sneeh, Eddie" <eddie.sneeh <at> roche.com>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: ls -d
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 17:01:06 -0700

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,
I believe there is a problem with ls -d (unless the intent is to just list
1 directory).
Say I have a dir mydir, it has directories d1 and d2, and files f1 and f2.
I want to list only d1 and d2.  How do I do that?  I tried ls -d but that
doesn't seem to work:
\ls -d mydir
returns: mydir
\ls -d mydir/*
returns: mydir/d1 mydir/d2 mydir/f1 mydir/f2
but f1 and f2 are files.

How can I achieve the following:
\ls ?????? mydir
to return: mydir/d1 mydir/d2



-- 
Best Regards,
*Eddie Sneeh*

[Message part 7 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.