From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:09:18 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#21150 <21150@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#21150 <21150@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.5; octave-inf mode does not need --no-line-editing Reply-To: bug#21150 <21150@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:09:18 +0000 retitle 21150 24.5; octave-inf mode does not need --no-line-editing reassign 21150 emacs submitter 21150 Francesco Potort=C3=AC severity 21150 minor thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 28 09:40:27 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jul 2015 13:40:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60829 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK57K-0005Hs-9L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:40:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK57E-0005Hg-Gx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:40:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK579-00078m-DM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:40:20 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:39000) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK579-00078i-As for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:40:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45875) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK574-0002NO-OM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:40:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK56y-0006vM-I7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:40:10 -0400 Received: from blade4.isti.cnr.it ([194.119.192.20]:14441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK56y-0006ro-87 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:40:04 -0400 Received: from tucano.isti.cnr.it ([146.48.81.102]) by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.5-x6 #32097) with ESMTPSA id <01POVP0NLZG89QZCZ2@mx.isti.cnr.it> for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:40:01 +0200 (MEST) Received: from pot by tucano.isti.cnr.it with local (Exim 4.86_RC5) (envelope-from ) id 1ZK56v-0003q2-LX; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:40:01 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:40:01 +0200 From: Francesco =?utf-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Subject: 24.5; octave-inf mode does not need --no-line-editing To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Message-id: Organization: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-INSM-ip-source: 146.48.81.102 Auth Done X-fingerprint: 4B02 6187 5C03 D6B1 2E31 7666 09DF 2DC9 BE21 6115 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Kurt Hornik , "John W. Eaton" , Mike Miller X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) In Octave inferior mode, defined in octave-inf.el, the Octave process= is called with the --no-line-editing option. This option should be deleted, because apparently it is useless and it causes problems. The problem is that Octave disables everything related to readline wi= th that option, which has the side effects of making Octave incapable of getting the terminal line width and of using the Ftlk graphics engine= . These problems could in principle be corrected inside Octave, but in fact the --no-line-editing option seems to be not necessary (no more?= ), as I have experienced in several weeks of using Octave under Emacs wi= th a modified octave-inf.el. Note that it is unlikely that other users have had a different experience, as I am one of the few users which a= re both proficient in Emacs and Octave and uses routinely Octave in an Emacs buffer. As you can read in the following email, all the other potentially involved developers have nothing to add to this description of facts. In short, please remove the "--no-line-editing" option from the list = of options in octave-inf.el. --=20 Francesco Potort=C3=AC (ricercatore) Voice: +39.050.621.3058 ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Mobile: +39.348.8283.107 via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Skype: wnlabisti (entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71) Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.it ------- Start of forwarded message ------- Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 19:33:16 +0200 =46rom: Kurt Hornik Subject: Fwd: Re: changing terminal size In-reply-to: To: Francesco Potort=C3=AC Cc: Kurt Hornik , Mike Miller , "John W. Eaton" Reply-to: Kurt.Hornik@wu.ac.at >>>>> Francesco Potort=C3=AC writes: > Kurt, > I am writing to you about the --no-line-editing option that is used= when > calling octave in inferior octave mode under Emacs. That option ca= uses > at least to nasty side effects. As you can read in the Debian bug > report linked at the end of the following email, it disables Octave= 's > modern graphics engine. Moreover, it forces Octave into 80-column = mode, > sa discussed in the following email. > Both these problems could be in prnciple be corrected in Octave, > especially the second one. But I just tried to remove --no-line-ed= iting > from the list of options in octave-inf.el and everything seems to w= ork > well. > So, why is --no-line-editing there at all? Can it be simply delete= d > from the code of octave-inf.el? Francesco, Sorry ... I really don't know any more. It must be more than 20 year= s ago that I wrote the code ... Best - -k > --=20 > Francesco Potort=C3=AC (ricercatore) Voice: +39.050.621.305= 8 > ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Mobile: +39.348.8283.107 > via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Skype: wnlabisti > (entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71) Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.= it > ------- Start of forwarded message ------- > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:23:27 -0400 > From: Mike Miller > Subject: Re: changing terminal size > In-reply-to: > To: Francesco Potort=C3=AC > Cc: Octave users list , "John W. Eaton" > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 20:07:52 +0200, Francesco Potort=C3=AC wrot= e: >> Probably the clean solution would be to not using readline for get= ting >> terminal width and height, if possible. > We could add a fallback to get the terminal size directly if readli= ne > is disabled, but IMHO we should also definitely add support for > overriding the terminal size with COLUMNS and LINES regardless. >> However, there is fundamental question: why ever is --no-line-edit= ing >> needed at all? I just tried modifying octave-inf.el to call Octav= e >> without it, and apparently all is well, the columns behave as they >> should and all the resta s well... > I don't know, that's a question for the Emacs devs who work on the > Octave mode. You might have better luck asking on an emacs list. I > suspect it's because Emacs wants to be in charge of line editing, > history, completion, etc, and maybe there is some interference or > other reason to want to disable readline in the target program. > We talked about all of this a while ago on Debian #675509 [1] where > you proposed that Octave mode should not be based on comint mode. I > have no opinion or insight into what any of that means, but it is > still based on comint mode today and does still set the > - --no-line-editing option. IMHO taking this up with the maintainer= s of > the Octave mode script is the best way forward. > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D675509 > - --=20 > mike > ------- End of forwarded message ------- ------- End of forwarded message ------- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 31 11:31:23 2015 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2015 15:31:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35956 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLCHL-0007TZ-47 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:31:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44246) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLCHJ-0007Rx-KL for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:31:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLCHI-0002OB-TP for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:31:21 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40377) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLCHI-0002Nu-Q4 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:31:20 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLCHI-0006rT-Hb for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:31:20 -0400 Subject: control message for bug 21162 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.99.98) Message-Id: From: Glenn Morris Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:31:20 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) merge 21150 21162 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 26 18:58:54 2021 Received: (at 21150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2021 22:58:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50234 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lm2UH-0004fc-NO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 18:58:53 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:35324) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lm2UB-0004fF-S8; Wed, 26 May 2021 18:58:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MlqifTZ3HX03jlUkU85Hty6ofNStaeJeqj853hluZlQ=; b=VXprxXPIuMm9YgQKJbLeNwEpN6 /ddWHuCQ7CRmxUoKDviJ1v41dwLVK1cQcCX5bXXl2QsNQTFbu3DfA21eDaO2On0mCEwKBqIU+7eZE 2ICL8Wb/X1wqRUNNPlik2D6BJ8Ld6h8GGrQnDjeq7sKjyAx8FeEx2Ex/q0bhs94Fn19A=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lm2Tz-0004GM-R2; Thu, 27 May 2021 00:58:38 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Francesco =?utf-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Subject: Re: bug#21150: 24.5; octave-inf mode does not need --no-line-editing References: X-Now-Playing: Tuxedomoon's _Live At The Palms (1978)_: "Pollo X" Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 00:58:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: ("Francesco =?utf-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC=22's?= message of "Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:26:01 +0200") Message-ID: <87tump6r1g.fsf_-_@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Francesco Potortì writes: > -(defcustom inferior-octave-startup-args '("-i" "--no-line-editing") > +(defcustom inferior-octave-startup-args '("-i") [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21150 Cc: Glenn Morris , 21162@debbugs.gnu.org, "John W. Eaton" , 21150@debbugs.gnu.org, Kurt.Hornik@wu-wien.ac.at, Mike Miller X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Francesco Potort=C3=AC writes: > -(defcustom inferior-octave-startup-args '("-i" "--no-line-editing") > +(defcustom inferior-octave-startup-args '("-i") [...] Francesco Potort=C3=AC writes: > As a conclusion of my observations above: > > A. if --no-line-editing was introduce because of the Emacs inferior > Octave mode > > B. if it is reasonable to assume that --no-line-editing is not used by > any other application > > C. if there is a way to leave readline enabled, but disable tab expansion > > then one can change the --no-line-editing behaviour to just disable tab > expansion. > > Or, if only C is certainly true, one can deprecate and undocument > --no-line-editing and add a separate option --disable-tab-expansion for > use in Emacs inferior Octave mode. I'm going through old bug reports, and after skimming this one, I'm not quite sure what the conclusions are. Should the --no-line-editing value be removed from the options? --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 08 09:09:35 2021 Received: (at 21150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jun 2021 13:09:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57666 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqbU7-0006Zo-En for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:09:35 -0400 Received: from plesklin7.if2.ehiweb.it ([79.98.45.17]:51646 helo=plesklin7.if1.ehiweb.it) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqbU4-0006Zb-J0; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:09:33 -0400 Received: from tucano.isti.cnr.it (tucano.isti.cnr.it [146.48.81.102]) by plesklin7.if1.ehiweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87E35104DA0; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:09:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <87im2omrjq.fsf@tucano.isti.cnr.it> From: =?utf-8?Q?Francesco_Potort=C3=AC?= Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 15:09:29 +0200 To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87tump6r1g.fsf_-_@gnus.org> (larsi@gnus.org) Subject: Re: bug#21150: 24.5; octave-inf mode does not need --no-line-editing References: <87tump6r1g.fsf_-_@gnus.org> Organization: The GNU project X-fingerprint: 4B02 6187 5C03 D6B1 2E31 7666 09DF 2DC9 BE21 6115 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-PPP-Message-ID: <20210608130930.7952.52871@plesklin7.if1.ehiweb.it> X-PPP-Vhost: potorti.it X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > >Francesco Potortì writes: > >> -(defcustom inferior-octave-startup-args '("-i" "--no-line-editing") >> +(defcustom inferior-octave-startup-args '("-i") > >[...] > >Francesco Potortì [...] Content analysis details: (1.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [79.98.45.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.4 KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS Relay HELO differs from its IP's reverse DNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21150 Cc: Glenn Morris , 21162@debbugs.gnu.org, "John W. Eaton" , 21150@debbugs.gnu.org, Kurt.Hornik@wu-wien.ac.at, Mike Miller X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) > >Francesco Potortì writes: > >> -(defcustom inferior-octave-startup-args '("-i" "--no-line-editing") >> +(defcustom inferior-octave-startup-args '("-i") > >[...] > >Francesco Potortì writes: > >> As a conclusion of my observations above: >> >> A. if --no-line-editing was introduce because of the Emacs inferior >> Octave mode >> >> B. if it is reasonable to assume that --no-line-editing is not used by >> any other application >> >> C. if there is a way to leave readline enabled, but disable tab expansion >> >> then one can change the --no-line-editing behaviour to just disable tab >> expansion. >> >> Or, if only C is certainly true, one can deprecate and undocument >> --no-line-editing and add a separate option --disable-tab-expansion for >> use in Emacs inferior Octave mode. > >I'm going through old bug reports, and after skimming this one, I'm not >quite sure what the conclusions are. Should the --no-line-editing value >be removed from the options? No. Not unless Octave adds a --disable--tab--expansion as I suggest in the second route that I described. The current options provide minimal damage with current Octave's behaviour. To do better, Octave should follow one of the two routes I illustrated above. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 09 05:36:00 2021 Received: (at 21150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2021 09:36:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqucy-0001yw-Gy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 05:36:00 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:35344) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqucw-0001yf-5h; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 05:35:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1LJKdvZf7Zo6n+lA4Ra7Gl203FMvPqgzNZjgqFQsPDo=; b=ta38Hqd8L7sVK6hiluL4gun/92 37qYAOWWhCaWLLsnPVNZswj5AicPVrQnad+A8jAuTTr+kAdrsqLesKDPgh3hThymtXfR2crEEoVqe zBHhKiflXO1uvBrEYjIN1/uEVUuO4LoqWekjP/dQVK63TC8nbFtxg7ZlW9LyJjKJswKU=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lqucj-0002P9-Ae; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 11:35:47 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Francesco =?utf-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Subject: Re: bug#21150: 24.5; octave-inf mode does not need --no-line-editing References: <87tump6r1g.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <87im2omrjq.fsf@tucano.isti.cnr.it> X-Now-Playing: Nobukazu Takemura's _10th_: "dog bee and butterfly" Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 11:35:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87im2omrjq.fsf@tucano.isti.cnr.it> ("Francesco =?utf-8?Q?Pot?= =?utf-8?Q?ort=C3=AC=22's?= message of "Tue, 08 Jun 2021 15:09:29 +0200") Message-ID: <877dj3mlcf.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Francesco Potortì writes: > No. Not unless Octave adds a --disable--tab--expansion as I suggest in > the second route that I described. > > The current options provide minimal damage with current Octave's > behaviour. To do be [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21150 Cc: Glenn Morris , 21162@debbugs.gnu.org, "John W. Eaton" , 21150@debbugs.gnu.org, Kurt.Hornik@wu-wien.ac.at, Mike Miller X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Francesco Potort=C3=AC writes: > No. Not unless Octave adds a --disable--tab--expansion as I suggest in > the second route that I described. > > The current options provide minimal damage with current Octave's > behaviour. To do better, Octave should follow one of the two routes I > illustrated above. Is there anything more to be done here on the Emacs side of things, then? --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 09 06:19:13 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2021 10:19:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60556 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqvIm-0007So-S0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 06:19:12 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36136) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqvIl-0007ST-Eq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 06:19:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=AuYclbVXb9yNbm+NXTxwo6vlOySRUtmpTC6mHsyhDVI=; b=WqdoTxiYEGVnlWKZcOyaT5lmbZ XS5jl5VQRZkfGxNBTTZc+893DcpK6N1WnLLaniqw1NbEgIjdPhpKo02utnlknu8yF9hWTBTrgsueH jYuS6CtzsP1kQIneUyic8ZRayeLzaa7UnNOns9VgPVKi5bQdivZeiabH1eGOoWPiURsU=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lqvId-0002oM-NM for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 12:19:05 +0200 Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 12:19:03 +0200 Message-Id: <87im2nl4rs.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #21150 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 21150 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) close 21150 quit From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:09:18 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator