GNU bug report logs - #21142
Sshfs-fuse requires fuse

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>

Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:06:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: wontfix

Fixed in version 0.9.0

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #11 received at 21142 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
To: Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) <gnu <at> clacke.user.lysator.liu.se>
Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, 21142 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21142: Sshfs-fuse requires fuse
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:20:50 -0400
Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) <gnu <at> clacke.user.lysator.liu.se> writes:

> On 27-Jul-2015 5:06 pm, "Andreas Enge" <andreas <at> enge.fr> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> when trying to execute sshfs from the sshfs-fuse package, I obtain
>> fuse: failed to exec fusermount: No such file or directory
>>
>> I think that fuse should be a propagated input of sshfs-fuse.
>
> Maybe it's less intrusive toward the user to wrap sshfs to add fuse to
> its PATH?

Or patch the reference to 'fusermount' to be an absolute path?

I haven't looked into this, so I don't know the feasibility of these
approaches, but in general I think that 'propagated-inputs' should be
avoided whenever there is a reasonable alternative.

What do you think?

      Mark




This bug report was last modified 198 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.