GNU bug report logs - #21039
shell-command - bug and workaround.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 21039 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 21039 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "73budden ." <budden73 <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: shell-command - bug and workaround.
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 00:01:09 +0300

Hi!
  Please allow me to refer to my bug report I posted to SBCL bug database:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1470500

Message #8 received at 21039 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: "73budden ." <budden73 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 21039 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21039: shell-command - bug and workaround.
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:03:03 -0400

"73budden ." wrote:

>   Please allow me to refer to my bug report I posted to SBCL bug database:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1470500

Please make your bug reports self-contained.
Please give us a minimal example starting from emacs -Q that show what
the issue is. Thanks.

Message #11 received at 21039 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 21039 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, budden73 <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#21039: shell-command - bug and workaround.
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:08:13 +0300

> From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:03:03 -0400
> Cc: 21039 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> "73budden ." wrote:
> 
> >   Please allow me to refer to my bug report I posted to SBCL bug database:
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1470500
> 
> Please make your bug reports self-contained.
> Please give us a minimal example starting from emacs -Q that show what
> the issue is. Thanks.

FWIW, I've read that SBCL bug report, and it involves 2 pieces of
software none of which are part of Emacs -- the SBCL binary and SLIME.
It could well be due to a bug in either one of these, or both, not in
Emacs.  Someone who responded to the bug report claimed that they see
the same problem in Emacs without SLIME and SBCL, but provided no
details.

So I guess we'd like to see a similar problem that involves neither
SBCL nor SLIME, and we'd like a recipe for that starting with "emacs -Q",
indeed.

TIA

Message #18 received at 21039-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 21039-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#21039: shell-command - bug and workaround.
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:01:11 -0500

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> FWIW, I've read that SBCL bug report, and it involves 2 pieces of
> software none of which are part of Emacs -- the SBCL binary and SLIME.
> It could well be due to a bug in either one of these, or both, not in
> Emacs.  Someone who responded to the bug report claimed that they see
> the same problem in Emacs without SLIME and SBCL, but provided no
> details.
>
> So I guess we'd like to see a similar problem that involves neither
> SBCL nor SLIME, and we'd like a recipe for that starting with "emacs -Q",
> indeed.

No response in over a year, closing.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.