From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:21:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#21037: 24.5; uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p does nothing Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 17:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 21037 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 21037@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14366361327193 (code B ref -1); Sat, 11 Jul 2015 17:36:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2015 17:35:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46983 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygV-0001rx-Tx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44766) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygT-0001rb-F4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygN-0002YI-6S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:23 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:53707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygN-0002Y3-3i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygM-0003xn-A2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygL-0002W8-Ef for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]:35695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygL-0002Ul-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:21 -0400 Received: by wiga1 with SMTP id a1so37669228wig.0 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 10:35:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0otCF7xXqSI0ywaK8sZIP6Htp2jGLRnHfkkau3T8n1Y=; b=X9BaCypVbF7+T6kyHxRjUoqvJUXZT1jwYWaVeVIzBJdoLzBe4wR9w+d7JT9Rt8hY+d OATQ8Z4EgSr1W8z5+nld72RbMLPveP/mXEgAcBbYph8R7erUFAxOWl1BYJbm5K5kfbj1 5UHaPJCROic8kzYMko2pcbhdFqeBEcVqfPCKcQCgqYOe3q0U+DdTv91MhW0rpRdijlDn sxocuVtGUD3BLgEWqNwqbe+TmS1YFVRyBk1Ojblj47UdcEozZElJFNp+T/0+tiUE51Vf us1lrJ1ZvTC+guuvDmOk8W/pT6LoM8VtfEJRsNnJeO2SA0kZePr47p626viQPfJw8JwY 7zig== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.48.8 with SMTP id h8mr46667500wjn.82.1436636118990; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 10:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.146.11 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 10:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:18 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jH6Aob6eYR9eX9WDtOhSQwBH6gw Message-ID: From: Noam Postavsky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) mkdir a b echo _ > a/foo.txt echo _ > b/foo.txt emacs -Q -l uniquify --eval "(setq uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p t)" a/foo.txt b/foo.txt I don't get asked any questions about buffer name. There are no references to uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p in uniquify.el except for the definition and in the "Change Log" comments. This option seems pretty useless to me (since the user can always rename any buffer at any time), so I think removing it would be fine. At any rate, having a non-functional option looks like a bug. From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:21:39 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Noam Postavsky Subject: bug#21037: closed (Re: bug#21037: 24.5; uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p does nothing) Message-ID: References: X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 21037 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 21037@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 20:55:03 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1439499303-20175-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1439499303-20175-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #21037: 24.5; uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p does nothing which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 21037@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 21037: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D21037 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1439499303-20175-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 21037-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Aug 2015 20:54:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPzVq-0005EK-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:54:11 -0400 Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:51751) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPzVo-0005EB-8R for 21037-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:54:09 -0400 Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.DIT.UMontreal.CA (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t7DKsL7e022747; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:54:21 -0400 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 41DF666132; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:54:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Noam Postavsky Subject: Re: bug#21037: 24.5; uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p does nothing Message-ID: References: Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:54:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Noam Postavsky's message of "Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:18 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5397=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5397> : inlines <3639> : streams <1487875> : uri <2013669> X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21037-done Cc: 21037-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) > I don't get asked any questions about buffer name. There are no > references to uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p in uniquify.el except > for the definition and in the "Change Log" comments. Indeed. > This option seems pretty useless to me (since the user can always > rename any buffer at any time), so I think removing it would be fine. > At any rate, having a non-functional option looks like a bug. Agreed, I just removed the defcustom. Thank you, Stefan ------------=_1439499303-20175-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2015 17:35:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46983 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygV-0001rx-Tx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44766) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygT-0001rb-F4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygN-0002YI-6S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:23 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:53707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygN-0002Y3-3i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygM-0003xn-A2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygL-0002W8-Ef for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]:35695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDygL-0002Ul-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:21 -0400 Received: by wiga1 with SMTP id a1so37669228wig.0 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 10:35:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0otCF7xXqSI0ywaK8sZIP6Htp2jGLRnHfkkau3T8n1Y=; b=X9BaCypVbF7+T6kyHxRjUoqvJUXZT1jwYWaVeVIzBJdoLzBe4wR9w+d7JT9Rt8hY+d OATQ8Z4EgSr1W8z5+nld72RbMLPveP/mXEgAcBbYph8R7erUFAxOWl1BYJbm5K5kfbj1 5UHaPJCROic8kzYMko2pcbhdFqeBEcVqfPCKcQCgqYOe3q0U+DdTv91MhW0rpRdijlDn sxocuVtGUD3BLgEWqNwqbe+TmS1YFVRyBk1Ojblj47UdcEozZElJFNp+T/0+tiUE51Vf us1lrJ1ZvTC+guuvDmOk8W/pT6LoM8VtfEJRsNnJeO2SA0kZePr47p626viQPfJw8JwY 7zig== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.48.8 with SMTP id h8mr46667500wjn.82.1436636118990; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 10:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.146.11 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 10:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:35:18 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jH6Aob6eYR9eX9WDtOhSQwBH6gw Message-ID: Subject: 24.5; uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p does nothing From: Noam Postavsky To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) mkdir a b echo _ > a/foo.txt echo _ > b/foo.txt emacs -Q -l uniquify --eval "(setq uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p t)" a/foo.txt b/foo.txt I don't get asked any questions about buffer name. There are no references to uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p in uniquify.el except for the definition and in the "Change Log" comments. This option seems pretty useless to me (since the user can always rename any buffer at any time), so I think removing it would be fine. At any rate, having a non-functional option looks like a bug. ------------=_1439499303-20175-1--