From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:39:27 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#21036 <21036@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#21036 <21036@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 25.0.50; Wrong index entry for rebinding keys Reply-To: bug#21036 <21036@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:39:27 +0000 retitle 21036 25.0.50; Wrong index entry for rebinding keys reassign 21036 emacs submitter 21036 Drew Adams severity 21036 minor tag 21036 fixed confirmed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 11 13:15:48 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2015 17:15:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46978 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDyNP-0001PJ-NQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:15:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41814) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDyNN-0001P6-U1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:15:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDyNH-0001gV-OE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:15:40 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:35421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDyNH-0001gR-LN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:15:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55315) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDyNG-0002pH-Nz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:15:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDyNB-0001eb-KH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:15:38 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:22770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDyNB-0001eL-0d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:15:33 -0400 Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id t6BHFVRj008886 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 17:15:32 GMT Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6BHFVaW026464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 17:15:31 GMT Received: from abhmp0002.oracle.com (abhmp0002.oracle.com [141.146.116.8]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6BHFVOf016975 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 17:15:31 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 10:15:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Drew Adams To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.0.50; Wrong index entry for rebinding keys X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9 (901082) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) C-h r i rebind TAB shows these candidates: rebinding keys, permanently rebinding major mode keys rebinding mouse buttons rebinding non-ASCII keys And if I use Icicles apropos completion, I can see these candidates: key rebinding, permanent key rebinding, this session ; <=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D MISSING above rebinding keys, permanently=20 rebinding major mode keys rebinding mouse buttons rebinding non-ASCII keys=20 First, there should be an entry that starts with "rebinding" and that corresponds to entry `key rebinding, this session' and targets node `Rebinding'. Second, the target for `rebinding keys, permanently' and `key rebinding, permanent' is incorrect, IMO. Those entries should target node `Init Rebinding', not node `Init File'. There is nothing in node `Init File' about keys. In GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32) of 2015-07-03 on LEG570 Bzr revision: 2b848fadd51e805b2f46da64c5958ea7f009048a Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --host=3Di686-pc-mingw32 --enable-checking=3Dyes,glyphs' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 16:28:34 2019 Received: (at 21036) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 20:28:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55452 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htHgg-00027M-6Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:28:34 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45908) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htHge-00027E-Uq for 21036@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:28:33 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htHga-0003dX-Tp; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 22:28:31 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Drew Adams Subject: Re: bug#21036: 25.0.50; Wrong index entry for rebinding keys References: Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 22:28:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 11 Jul 2015 10:15:25 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <87v9vgd40j.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Drew Adams writes: > C-h r i rebind TAB shows these candidates: > > rebinding keys, permanently > rebinding major mode keys > rebinding mouse buttons > rebinding non-ASCII keys > > And if I use Icicles apropos completio [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21036 Cc: 21036@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Drew Adams writes: > C-h r i rebind TAB shows these candidates: > > rebinding keys, permanently > rebinding major mode keys > rebinding mouse buttons > rebinding non-ASCII keys > > And if I use Icicles apropos completion, I can see these candidates: > > key rebinding, permanent > key rebinding, this session ; <===== MISSING above > rebinding keys, permanently > rebinding major mode keys > rebinding mouse buttons > rebinding non-ASCII keys > > First, there should be an entry that starts with "rebinding" and that > corresponds to entry `key rebinding, this session' and targets node > `Rebinding'. This is from the node: @node Rebinding @subsection Changing Key Bindings Interactively @cindex key rebinding, this session @cindex redefining keys, this session @cindex binding keys I wonder whether that @cindex redefining keys, this session is a mistake, and that it should be @cindex rebinding keys, this session Opinions? > Second, the target for `rebinding keys, permanently' and `key rebinding, > permanent' is incorrect, IMO. Those entries should target node `Init > Rebinding', not node `Init File'. There is nothing in node `Init File' > about keys. This was fixed by Eli in 2018. They now point to "Init Rebinding". -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 16:28:43 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2019 20:28:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55455 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htHgp-00027m-Eu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:28:43 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45922) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htHgo-00027f-GL for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:28:42 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htHgl-0003dd-Sh for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 22:28:41 +0200 Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 22:28:39 +0200 Message-Id: <87tvb0d408.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #21036 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 21036 + confirmed quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 21036 + confirmed quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 02 02:49:11 2019 Received: (at 21036) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2019 06:49:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55728 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htRNH-0004br-5a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 02:49:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38935) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htRNF-0004bY-Uo for 21036@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 02:49:10 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htRNA-0006QX-PI; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 02:49:04 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2525 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1htRNA-0001Ew-9L; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 02:49:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 09:48:59 +0300 Message-Id: <83blx8gizo.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-reply-to: <87v9vgd40j.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 01 Aug 2019 22:28:28 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#21036: 25.0.50; Wrong index entry for rebinding keys References: <87v9vgd40j.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21036 Cc: 21036@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 22:28:28 +0200 > Cc: 21036@debbugs.gnu.org > > @node Rebinding > @subsection Changing Key Bindings Interactively > @cindex key rebinding, this session > @cindex redefining keys, this session > @cindex binding keys > > I wonder whether that > > @cindex redefining keys, this session > > is a mistake, and that it should be > > @cindex rebinding keys, this session Yes, it's most probably the result of M-/ or somesuch. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 02 06:45:42 2019 Received: (at 21036) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2019 10:45:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55841 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htV49-00022E-Rj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 06:45:42 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:56676) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htV48-000226-JR for 21036@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 06:45:41 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htV43-0001Fx-Vh; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 12:45:38 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#21036: 25.0.50; Wrong index entry for rebinding keys References: <87v9vgd40j.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <83blx8gizo.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 12:45:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83blx8gizo.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 02 Aug 2019 09:48:59 +0300") Message-ID: <87k1bvalrl.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> @node Rebinding >> @subsection Changing Key Bindings Interactively >> @cindex key rebinding, this session >> @cindex redefining keys, this session >> @cindex binding keys >> >> I wonder whether tha [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 21036 Cc: 21036@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> @node Rebinding >> @subsection Changing Key Bindings Interactively >> @cindex key rebinding, this session >> @cindex redefining keys, this session >> @cindex binding keys >> >> I wonder whether that >> >> @cindex redefining keys, this session >> >> is a mistake, and that it should be >> >> @cindex rebinding keys, this session > > Yes, it's most probably the result of M-/ or somesuch. OK; I've now changed the text and I'm closing this report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 02 06:45:47 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2019 10:45:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55844 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htV4F-00022Y-3T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 06:45:47 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:56690) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htV4D-00022R-M8 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 06:45:46 -0400 Received: from 77.18.62.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.62.220] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htV4B-0001G4-1i for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 12:45:45 +0200 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 12:45:42 +0200 Message-Id: <87imrfalrd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #21036 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 21036 fixed close 21036 27.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 21036 fixed close 21036 27.1 quit From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:39:27 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator