GNU bug report logs -
#20945
One guile test failed
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 20945 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 20945 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#20945
; Package
guile
.
(Tue, 30 Jun 2015 20:05:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Christopher White <ceedave <at> me.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 30 Jun 2015 20:05:08 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,
For your information, make check produced one error, on OS X Yosemite.
[check-guile.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Thank you.
Regards,
Chris
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#20945
; Package
guile
.
(Fri, 24 Jun 2016 07:17:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 20945 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Thanks for the report.
On Tue 30 Jun 2015 21:43, Christopher White <ceedave <at> me.com> writes:
> For your information, make check produced one error, on OS X Yosemite.
>
> FAIL: numbers.test: string->number: valid complex number strings
Does this still happen for you?
If so, can you paste this at a REPL or in a file and see what it prints
out?
(for-each (lambda (triple)
(apply
(lambda (str re im)
(let ((z (string->number str)))
(if (or (eq? z #f)
(not (and (eqv? (real-part z) re)
(eqv? (imag-part z) im))))
(begin
(pk str re im)
(throw 'fail)))))
triple))
`(("1 <at> 0" 1 0) ("1@+0" 1 0) ("1@-0" 1 0) ("1/2 <at> 0" 1/2 0)
("1.0 <at> 0" 1.0 0) ("1.0@-0" 1.0 0)
("#e1 <at> 0" 1 0) ("#e1@+0" 1 0) ("#e1@-0" 1 0) ("#e0.5 <at> 0.0" 1/2 0)
("#e1.0 <at> 0" 1 0) ("#e1.0@-0" 1 0)
("#i1 <at> 0" 1.0 0.0) ("#i1@+0" 1.0 0.0) ("#i1@-0" 1.0 -0.0) ("#i1/2 <at> 0" 0.5 0.0)
("#i1.0 <at> 0" 1.0 0.0) ("#i1.0@-0" 1.0 -0.0)
("1@+0.0" 1.0 0.0) ("1.0@-0.0" 1.0 -0.0)
("2+3i" 2.0 3.0) ("4-5i" 4.0 -5.0)
("1+i" 1.0 1.0) ("1-i" 1.0 -1.0) ("+1i" 0.0 1.0) ("-1i" 0.0 -1.0)
("+i" 0.0 1.0) ("-i" 0.0 -1.0)
("1.0+.1i" 1.0 0.1) ("1.0-.1i" 1.0 -0.1)
(".1+.0i" 0.1 0.0) ("1.+.0i" 1.0 0.0) (".1+.1i" 0.1 0.1)
("1e1+.1i" 10.0 0.1)
("0@+nan.0" 0 0) ("0@+inf.0" 0 0) ("0@-inf.0" 0 0)
("0.0@+nan.0" 0.0 0.0) ("0.0@+inf.0" 0.0 0.0) ("0.0@-inf.0" 0.0 0.0)
("#i0@+nan.0" 0.0 0.0) ("#i0@+inf.0" 0.0 0.0) ("#i0@-inf.0" 0.0 0.0)
("0.0 <at> 1" 0.0 0.0) ("0.0 <at> 2" -0.0 0.0) ("0.0 <at> 4" -0.0 -0.0) ("0.0 <at> 5" 0.0 -0.0)
))
Cheers,
Andy
Reply sent
to
Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Christopher White <ceedave <at> me.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 20945-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Fri 24 Jun 2016 09:16, Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com> writes:
> Thanks for the report.
>
> On Tue 30 Jun 2015 21:43, Christopher White <ceedave <at> me.com> writes:
>
>> For your information, make check produced one error, on OS X Yosemite.
>>
>> FAIL: numbers.test: string->number: valid complex number strings
I think this is fixed by Matt Wette in master; should come out in a new
release shortly. Thanks again for the report.
Andy
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 84 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.