GNU bug report logs - #20943
25.0.50; Dired buffers are not always auto-reverterd

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Mark Karpov <markkarpov <at> openmailbox.org>

Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 18:24:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 25.0.50

Done: Mark Karpov <markkarpov <at> openmailbox.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #77 received at 20943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
To: Mark Karpov <markkarpov <at> openmailbox.org>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 20943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20943: 25.0.50; Dired buffers are not always auto-reverterd
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 11:20:56 +0200
Mark Karpov <markkarpov <at> openmailbox.org> writes:

> When I copy some files or create files, they are placed by Dired in
> different positions than they would be placed normally (via ls call or
> whatever Emacs uses internally). This is a separate problem, because of
> this, I had to press ā€˜g’ in such cases, so every file gets in its proper
> position. 
>
> What I propose is to make sure that copied/created/added to current
> directory by other means files are in the same positions as they would
> be displayed by ls command (or whatever Emacs uses), so when user
> presses ā€˜g’ order of files doesn't change.

This is a feature of dired. It doesn't want to regenerate the whole
dired buffer; instead it adds the new entry at the position the cursor
is pointing to. This is because reverting the dired buffer could be
expensive. Think about a remote directory, think about many inserted
subdirectories.

Good or bad, if we want to change this behavour we would need a customer
option which would trigger the regeneration of the dired buffer
automatically.

Best regards, Michael.




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 310 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.