GNU bug report logs - #20898
25.0.50; Move landmark.el to elpa

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Nicolas Richard <youngfrog <at> members.fsf.org>

Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:44:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 25.0.50

Done: Nicolas Richard <youngfrog <at> members.fsf.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Nicolas Richard <youngfrog <at> members.fsf.org>
Subject: bug#20898: closed (Re: bug#20898: 25.0.50; Move landmark.el to elpa)
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:44:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#20898: 25.0.50; Move landmark.el to elpa

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 20898 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
20898: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20898
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Nicolas Richard <youngfrog <at> members.fsf.org>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 20898-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20898: 25.0.50; Move landmark.el to elpa
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:43:39 +0200
Finally marking as done. Sorry for the long delay.

Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Nicolas Richard wrote:
>> - add a Maintainer header (who should that be ? the original author ?)
> I think the honest answer is that it has no maintainer.
> I'd either leave it with no Maintainer header (which by convention means
> the author), or add one that says help wanted.

Since the requirement for ELPA is to have such a header, I went for the
second option.

Nicolas.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Nicolas Richard <youngfrog <at> members.fsf.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 25.0.50; Move landmark.el to elpa
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 19:42:38 +0200
A bit of searching shows that landmark.el is not used much (if at all),
and in fact causes confusion :
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2006-04/msg00294.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-06/msg00592.html

In that thread, Stefan suggests to move landmark.el to GNU elpa. I want
to give this a try. What's the procedure ?

My current plan is :
- move the file to lisp/obsolete/,
- add a note to lisp/obsolete/landmark.el that it moved to GNU Elpa
  (like what was done for crisp.el)
- mention these changes in ChangeLog and NEWS
- copy the file to elpa.git, as packages/landmark/landmark.el
- add a Maintainer header (who should that be ? the original author ?)
and that's about it.

Opinions and advices very welcome.



This bug report was last modified 10 years and 14 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.