GNU bug report logs - #20897
25.0.50; [python] sexp-movement are confusing

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Rasmus <rasmus <at> gmx.us>

Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:55:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 25.0.50

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Daniel Colascione <dancol <at> dancol.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>, Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler <at> easy-emacs.de>
Cc: 20897 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20897: 25.0.50; [python] sexp-movement are confusing
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:03:36 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 06/25/2015 09:48 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> If inside an expression C-M-f should to to its end.
> 
> No, as explained elsewhere, C-M-f's binding is a binding that goes to
> the end of the expression that immediately *follows* point.  If we're
> *inside* a sexp, the way to jump to its end is up-list.
> 
> I understand you want/like to jump to the end of the enclosing
> expression, and that's fine, but this is not what C-M-f should do
> by default.

"Right" or "wrong" aside, Python's current default behavior is just
inconsistent with other modes for infix-expression languages. I tried
for a long time to use the default behavior --- maybe there was some
efficiency advantage that would take time to appear --- but I ended up
just giving up and making python-mode work like other modes.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 167 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.