Subject: bug#20783: 25.0.50; [PATCH] byte-to-position has internal off-by-one bug

From: Wolfgang Jenkner <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:31:08 +0200

On Tue, Jun 16 2015, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> So I prefer the previous variant, even though it will lose that
> benchmark.

Neither do I care about winning the benchmark.  It just seemed the
better code from a micro-optimization point of view (in
a single-threaded emacs).  But I can't argue against your global
arguments, of course.  Thanks for explaining things.