GNU bug report logs - #20773
11.88.6; Preview fails on nested \include{} using \documentclass{sigplanconf}

Previous Next

Full log

Message #50 received at 20773 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
To: Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 20773 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#20773: 11.88.6; Preview fails on nested \include{} using
 \documentclass{sigplanconf}
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:08:15 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64 <at> gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>  Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64 <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>  > Nevermind. This was probably the result of a dirty environment. I
>  > can't seem to reproduce it.
>
>  Just to be sure, you can't reproduce it with the example files in your
>  last mail which use the article documentclass but you can still
>  reproduce it with the sigplanconf documentclass, right?
>
> That is what I meant.

(I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved
at the time.)

Is this issue still present?  IIUC, the sigplanconf.cls is superceded by
the acmart.cls[1], so I tried these files:

[main.tex (application/x-tex, attachment)]

[formalism.tex (application/x-tex, attachment)]

[formalism_atranslation.tex (application/x-tex, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (text/plain, inline)]

Opening formalism_atranslation.tex and previewing it looks like this:

[preview.png (image/png, inline)]

[Message part 7 (text/plain, inline)]

This is with TeXLive 2023 and GS 10.03.0.  Is this the expected result?

Best, Arash

Footnotes:
[1]  https://www.sigplan.org/Resources/LaTeXClassFile/

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.