From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:39:36 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#20747 <20747@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#20747 <20747@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.4; emacs24 seems to become unresponsive after having been iconised Reply-To: bug#20747 <20747@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:39:36 +0000 retitle 20747 24.4; emacs24 seems to become unresponsive after having been = iconised reassign 20747 emacs submitter 20747 Enno severity 20747 normal tag 20747 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 05 14:25:48 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2015 18:25:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42066 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0wJP-0003QB-P6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:25:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51411) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0wJL-0003Ps-UU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:25:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0wJG-0005P1-2V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:25:38 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:50572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0wJF-0005Ot-Vb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:25:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36678) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0wJE-0000Me-VH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:25:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0wJB-0005Je-P0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:25:36 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:53994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0wJB-0005Ht-G1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:25:33 -0400 Received: from mash ([88.116.180.142]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mh9cj-1Yec5y2jNR-00MMnM for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 20:25:31 +0200 Received: by mash (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A87F51D036; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 20:25:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 20:25:29 +0200 Message-Id: <2194-Fri05Jun2015202529+0200-enno.vet@gmx.net> X-Mailer: emacs 24.4.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) From: Enno To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.4; emacs24 seems to become unresponsive after having been iconised X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Bx13NVQj3l0u9VGlvDQlP9CwTBeYVYfNYKYDa85folChzv76EAW DAjdE4pHwA86T6tx5cKeKVWgqeKXA+2JolBIT2PoVLiRh8AAEgnvQLGwWLmeKadDQa5Bm3o 9e+4/g3A4UcrOCY06uX7Q7Y7CvYCq8pd4qADpXrRaZFJ7lEW7pAXcUVrhUmiTAwaklpL+nr m2L+ODlo3/LhknCNTr0VQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:5sdd/ef8w90=:GCAkBgkptKMk/qyS3gFdgs qHtPtlZDmkaV9L+dDvKJsg0wTtflih+eYeLnzIFzTHOFeUS5QlNSF7Y88XpBZUWN3kmOy0ImP ZxH+cQLyBjepdBlUBn0IaGJGKlCjykei2wlNdEbeHk2YNFOxddTNdwKGMI/5w/+Bjt2F3fuwJ TVXnB5MFhvLUHmfNz+r6KnvYqeWlh+bKpXL7HqM8tyO3TcylvDapvK5aR33hVUallJSqeE4cj zDV5/QZXd2NhXVqcGZtQWpPWXT6qi4EhQA1qn5326SD+0p5WMbK1kKfaQ4ev0jt5+CoZ3Y3PQ sL/yXd5AcRoDpPhamoIndLwHiKUIhM7YDjDqEO4f2S3E9F2mKAOxWj8Sr3PneeSKkld+VB7O9 7uIuZnetU2aZXD5ep9iOdFnTC/ccagf25HtkaGyxM3jLJTZVz5odI8sQKseUgG6iC+W+WCGrO jTcjrFhVrRb1KaZEfrT9BJEC6lVzYvIKlbPaB6guNZF4LyLjhnsU0Yb1kFxlR78tuB9besrh9 egUirxmhMVfbhh45GXYK0PCbzdaJUWjnx1Oe/HRNrcBZh8YsHmmxb4wZi6OHj9J5Hvt1dZNdU 3d2vgmtj14pqLZzxh3WdhSHkJjq3ELnv4CHhHmVyHBGYEr0Ox8//uG6Cam3qbEK87uheZGAez NsyCEd6inHNYO8rP4xfxi2GgK5fQkNJ5PQ2mNZL1lLzjDDg== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 emacs24:i386 (24.4+1-5) (debian) seems to become unresponsive after having been iconised (via C-z). Apart from the most irritating flickering of the scrollbar which occurs continuously while typing. After having reinstantiated emacs from its iconised state the minibuffer does not echo anything typed. emacs still reacts to C-x C-c and quits, but again no echo in the minibuffer. I'm using e17 as window-manager, but there was no such phenomenon with emacs23. Now I'm running emacs24-lucid without trouble. Brgds, ed. - -- // enno.vet@gmx.net /\\\ Mag. Enno Deimel .\ o \\ \ _ \ Wisely and slow; they stumble that run fast. \\\ \_/ gpg-fp: eefe b049 6fe6 fc0b 0ec4 f39e af6a c178 eb98 909a -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlVx6YAACgkQr2rBeOuYkJp3SgCfbiPDWAI5QTJxVt/Wn9wcdAhf wscAn2kKzhac5ygZ+bro+ksk0cvO9hD9 =KmJ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 09 06:14:49 2016 Received: (at 20747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Apr 2016 10:14:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aopui-0007Th-VY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:14:49 -0400 Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:33345) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aopuh-0007TZ-6z for 20747@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:14:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1D2AA51E5; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:14:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tn872mt7TEye; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:14:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (98-171.echostar.pl [213.156.98.171]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A965EAA51E4; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:14:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Marcin Borkowski To: Enno Subject: Re: bug#20747: 24.4; emacs24 seems to become unresponsive after having been iconised References: <2194-Fri05Jun2015202529+0200-enno.vet@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 12:14:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2194-Fri05Jun2015202529+0200-enno.vet@gmx.net> (Enno's message of "Fri, 5 Jun 2015 20:25:29 +0200") Message-ID: <878u0num0b.fsf@mbork.pl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20747 Cc: 20747@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On 2015-06-05, at 20:25, Enno wrote: > emacs24:i386 (24.4+1-5) (debian) seems to become unresponsive after > having been iconised (via C-z). Apart from the most irritating > flickering of the scrollbar which occurs continuously while typing. > After having reinstantiated emacs from its iconised state the minibuffer > does not echo anything typed. emacs still reacts to C-x C-c and quits, > but again no echo in the minibuffer. > > I'm using e17 as window-manager, but there was no such phenomenon with > emacs23. Now I'm running emacs24-lucid without trouble. > > Brgds, ed. Hi Enno, and thanks for the report. It seems it went unnoticed - I'm sorry for that. Could you tell us whether this issue is still present in current version of Emacs? Best, -- Marcin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 26 07:54:12 2019 Received: (at 20747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2019 11:54:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42816 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDSLb-0001Ni-Nt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:54:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f181.google.com ([209.85.215.181]:45724) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDSLZ-0001NU-Qo for 20747@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:54:10 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f181.google.com with SMTP id q7so1422129pgi.12 for <20747@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:54:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ViDBKFJ17OSQGSxrtw9IEwxSWJXQbLy//e8v1EOIdlY=; b=fcPtQTZRMH2vKv0SFaIaduzAU6VjbXiXRRLYDAr59/c4MX95X2/183pgAQSfJWEeQL OliQ/KGZ0spujALJ2Hqdi7CY3M63tKgcUpJdwU0G+OrfUrjyeFj73sos0sMuLz5zrGmB 6g5oUUOnmKMlKa3+dvwNNDE90+STvfC/cdkhLUAPgweiT5T5EmobZGD9ui0XrN0ditlh rTUJ4WXrWRe3sMmP7wjG4H8YSaAhgkws/y1q5t1sY5BN0cT4Xryvgf8LUvAJm2e9cltI rOd+A4M6aT3muYL0CGEbyM5Vl+Ven4MVV+0SXLfuJ1gZ3GL+HRDsQLEgtaSovNNYu9yn au3g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUI/hwb3COlgfNNkPEMVjpnAhv4znumKAUF7tUDuh5B2KFQcDfK UDcYo5Ou4aMoKr5i/KDz2tBDhz5PxF2+Itc8x7Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw/xVmPd6AnFrK5p62sg3RWarBQ1OJXEPOmTWtfOlKDQ2O1JTSu3dfKWTsXG8OtPDXmOCtMChRAJCEoljYoyuM= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8009:: with SMTP id j9mr3124213pfi.107.1569498843010; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:54:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Stefan Kangas Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:53:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#20747: 24.4; emacs24 seems to become unresponsive after having been iconised To: Marcin Borkowski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20747 Cc: 20747@debbugs.gnu.org, Enno X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Marcin Borkowski writes: > On 2015-06-05, at 20:25, Enno wrote: > >> emacs24:i386 (24.4+1-5) (debian) seems to become unresponsive after >> having been iconised (via C-z). Apart from the most irritating >> flickering of the scrollbar which occurs continuously while typing. >> After having reinstantiated emacs from its iconised state the minibuffer >> does not echo anything typed. emacs still reacts to C-x C-c and quits, >> but again no echo in the minibuffer. >> >> I'm using e17 as window-manager, but there was no such phenomenon with >> emacs23. Now I'm running emacs24-lucid without trouble. >> >> Brgds, ed. > > Hi Enno, > > and thanks for the report. It seems it went unnoticed - I'm sorry for > that. Could you tell us whether this issue is still present in current > version of Emacs? Hi Enno, That was three years ago, so I'm asking the same question again: Are you still seeing this on a recent version of Emacs? The latest version is 26.3 so perhaps you could try that. If I don't hear back from you in a couple of weeks, I'm just going to close this as unreproducible. Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 26 08:02:12 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2019 12:02:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42834 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDSTL-0001dM-TE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:02:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:36160) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDSTK-0001d4-GE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:02:11 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id f19so1250786plr.3 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:02:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=t33oE5sB63NN+Ss+qitW3zEfekiipzgfHjIW0kqmuNs=; b=o1GZ2IV+8jYV5Txr+F4mM7UzrL+vSMAn1y3h+tAgsltZW/QJFWhFVJEE2qQSlnWINT UGCDd+D4117KH+cpUunJMdY1gEBdRh7dM0G3hPeNEkUpefFrVaqNAcwKlZbq2OBt0Jpt vPcoTX6L2kSVFyqJkZkH9xUnw7wrX3ABjhJ3NGuwmythRpCOGu+HQB9RMREuisG/ECUc L/o73QSYcovwL5TxNxt6J/jxJiVTqh69O13D247Rugo1IPtMa8YUYpu8s9nKWhwn79GD EvPZ2QMpJPXe7Bqev3mZfTHvA9GcPZSlsfMcT1+zgXU5KA0FMN9Lgpekv5r1L/hIEURO 48yQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVdHCvHcS3yC27w1QzP+UNsLa0NMD665tV+lvA1BbNhX7cw8cvw 06jEj2A04Lwkos30dhroEGo2R8dwXTcXrNpwPs6wvQEd X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw2zqHYHb2EJhKTRdIVAaCa683gL5Rs2/XBL8HgZf0o1YEthXs2tPYD9/ASO/7kY44YTRPyL+O46HloafCnAzA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a515:: with SMTP id s21mr3564481plq.259.1569499324452; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:02:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Stefan Kangas Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 14:01:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 20747 moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.214.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.214.174 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 20747 moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.214.174 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.214.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager tags 20747 moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 30 16:46:12 2019 Received: (at 20747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2019 20:46:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60578 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iF2Ye-0006yh-CJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:46:12 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:52875) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iF2Yc-0006rW-A1 for 20747@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:46:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1569876350; bh=XZzoIACrehF20/PHySu0Fqf+VLSZ3P1Dq8ebvGovwpc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:CC:In-reply-to:Subject:References:Date; b=HuJkl35UrVsvYIN+K4gqL292XqTACgLpYwlzaAgUI36SQz1l+kQtL6+YaEkzwC9TF 5RYSmwCNuLiW1Rlnhs562+ALG9lL2kQA9KCxoTQ2K1jZG1QEh76HNZGMnhZ+0Aoe2D bFPBdC0bW7+J5JliiRwkVNqgSG6nTFCqyHswhkbk= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from tapas ([83.215.252.215]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N7i8Y-1i1LRM1cI6-014ixA; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:45:50 +0200 Received: by tapas (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6227E340D0D; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:45:46 +0200 (CEST) From: enno To: Stefan Kangas In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:53:51 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#20747: 24.4; emacs24 seems to become unresponsive after having been iconised References: Message-Id: <20190930204546.6227E340D0D@tapas> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:45:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:IikG2jY58HGVd/3nwQGKNn2zi4wqbZHpEmiLmd6m9CkqHRrjS64 XIEacbJIMZL31wxGjVySx99HCNknhCE/wI5YfINVK4FBW6JgY1NuBrVmGOeoGcLbUrPuHCx ltCxFkJU/mGNS7haco6FwUBeSmqt71v1mLo+zdeE2NAoI9CWS7Y8DWgRxkmi5ITugwRT4tI FGiihYDR2fYfum/zqSWcg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:1GkkndrJc90=:/XvOYDS/JOfQDZgenqEmRO D4pSWGcXOxVZXgGNdndwX8wP2q0X3WymQMK7MBikeAnnczX/yHo0iqYMDToROZHSi5yAsfO0e BSBQNH+GYxojXmPCJJITnhEc7Rdnh/2reQMn8KOcHGSu6t1uhI2W7QYz2S7pT8XSgl3kGRxZP u3GlKqRIGOzK89TdRvkqh9iWHPTyAm3LJU4JTJfdJfq2VawfzX8Wi93Us/Gbu8EsgZddFnjgQ n/a0g9gozOtqQ+mkzMHljOlBpQGCQv+6+RnptVzz8VBBJR206X+eRR8sj82CBJrknRAKLZxdv hYb2cFqsiweB9KcnfZbbQQdQZR0KlPCASF199CngVhsCsQ5BklMbwYCtUEPllpA0oHGbnfYMi iWY9UbO0a62ViYWjzkB0/jlSAzHpb5+DjCWNUDqbxpY34kdobBYip7typaRXJEGB3HVU5n3kK CtuwYclAu3ZFiArp00sBwBkERMxGneeeJ7O48wXUBC1PsegW1iXe2nLQSy1ud/yGI6yGxLaks 6H62nqNNv4229SCvuqCmjAr6cS9zcsDxTBmU9j2h1Eqm0DZnRsU5ColQ0jLeOUW/ciuLlnCLP 0JAnDl6J6by/cS6gkWe0LL1rm8QhItyUJwa/wJrSscfnhdSM0kPX9KVGRhXHukL6VeOXfoe6C 5RGYXRZk8i1HzkRVGxM7IomnS0DhLlXTKVL12UvCKG/OSI7y5fbdv9HXbrsD9BpfHMV8c2HYy UlOfZ69c1/UkT/8PrHUbscmQvUF2HCUW9u6WGN4pDuyD9QJHloLwEs4GhSGO4XoLIeTbho/SS ziDCSULPu4ImYLMb/WTfKrXFJ9bDLhjDAdLC8xTpkEj4k4u+KkualUlRkzDSzK3PwpvssimR1 Dw6njiICWVMO+jUy9DOS5hp8yircQ8VTVl+qjcL3VmI6SJNHuIr7enA42KsA4WiTe0c+7A+Pf xNEKsAg2GY32eVsgs5CXBrBQTqSFcC41KEvkrBhFKjYqOjEz/Vnu6B5dKCuoar923afcVLtl8 9xzaZQX4ZYE9hSOpxYVEMBweVRaZvm2MfUkWyIz3sAgJHO6K+PUoR6uaca519MbD/AkCB9LNU CFb3HWiNoKF0OSy2/x4D3iDmqOuSX+YkmmURdu4J9aJlFL+A5xpuWEA3uhPEzX1i6Wd2u2Ssf +88qpCLr5cYgspzz8ThklAdNbELEbDHh8rpqcqCxYWuvILHDpyhFJ1V6BMUri5w4wTtKZDobu M+MX6Nmp3E/m5tyCICBMqZgunNsLmhZoR4Et0tQ== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20747 Cc: 20747@debbugs.gnu.org, mbork@mbork.pl X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >>>>> "Stefan" =3D=3D Stefan Kangas writes: >>> emacs24:i386 (24.4+1-5) (debian) seems to become unresponsive >>> after having been iconised (via C-z). [...] > Hi Enno, > > That was three years ago, so I'm asking the same question again: > Are you still seeing this on a recent version of Emacs? The > latest version is 26.3 so perhaps you could try that. > > If I don't hear back from you in a couple of weeks, I'm just > going to close this as unreproducible. > > Best regards, Stefan Kangas Dear Stefan, I'm currently using GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 2, i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Versi= on 3.24.4) and the problem is partly still present: Emacs doesn't react t= o keyboard entries after having been minimized via C-z BUT on C-x C-f it n= ow opens up a gtk find file dialog insto using the minibuffer line that wo= rks selecting/opening a file, and after that all is back to normal. Strange but acceptable. 26.3 doesn't seem to be available in debian testing. Brgds, e. =2D- // enno.vet@gmx.net /\\\ Mag. Enno Deimel .\ o \\ \ _ \ Wisely and slow; they stumble that run fast. \\\ \_/ gpg-fp: eefe b049 6fe6 fc0b 0ec4 f39e af6a c178 eb98 909a From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 30 17:27:30 2019 Received: (at 20747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2019 21:27:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60618 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iF3Cc-0000Wy-HB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:27:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:47043) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iF3CY-0000Wf-Ne for 20747@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 17:27:28 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f169.google.com with SMTP id q5so6297606pfg.13 for <20747@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2WN4p89cFY6X4Qpd6lYIn0rLJeohagkL9TtYYryFF+o=; b=ZJ2Y1dBAdITpbL/TAQSItzFoppfZofcFbv2CM9qS08DvnY673MU7nZ0Dy288lORfCF 4WKSKmNXOtAEJRqh2G115HBwBVRbRRgUjB0/0vRcgl71bMQMUEDfBB1V1RtqUjR1Ex9z 7X8dyxl3KE8BDTM1CNu3cL7+xjqGVMH28AN3U3nLd8HnxrX1aWHpWTdVQmF4wqXr94el dnid5RUGlfDjscdRK/rP3QeyDnr26VePWvQk8nmZA7GKj9ic2o7CyLQymnak33dQhiUR lXQKGLJ8Dk/+ULepyzGkh6d8LNNCOWUspcIYVRG5Lgtgmb12ZFHqeTfzV+Jgvbf+/rxl Veig== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUatRdv4SKiUOV0cO0blA2wE3OA7C0WN6CHxbCCbTdZjaVO2Rl3 cLXfGnvZRmVUT383cRZwG1Ry0j6Oj3Vweo1+sng= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyI0Q3WjTpIlEzwBw62BDq9gxfA4JMHYmrfC2g4NWrM9sAZhU9u/HSvB2mBstOxGIJsC/kXyYU1mdhBOtUm5Gc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:cc08:: with SMTP id b8mr1416840pju.119.1569878840251; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 14:27:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190930204546.6227E340D0D@tapas> In-Reply-To: <20190930204546.6227E340D0D@tapas> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:27:09 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#20747: 24.4; emacs24 seems to become unresponsive after having been iconised To: enno Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20747 Cc: 20747@debbugs.gnu.org, Marcin Borkowski X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) enno writes: > I'm currently using GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 2, i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Vers= ion 3.24.4) and the problem is partly still present: Emacs doesn't react t= o keyboard entries after having been minimized via C-z BUT on C-x C-f it no= w opens up a gtk find file dialog insto using the minibuffer line that work= s selecting/opening a file, and after that all is back to normal. > > Strange but acceptable. Thanks for reporting back. Can you reproduce this when running "emacs -Q"? Could you give a detailed recipe for how to reproduce it? Could you please also say which window manager you are using? Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 01 16:46:17 2019 Received: (at 20747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2019 20:46:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34928 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFP2G-0003h2-Mi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 16:46:17 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:36837) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFP2B-0003ga-W7 for 20747@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 16:46:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1569962752; bh=f8eQ5FG7jQ0oMtP7SWtMQGTY8vVyQEO+fT+YTc5aSy0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:CC:In-reply-to:Subject:References:Date; b=EM23zZiID7DEkz4jz14pOCIK9gKcXNE8y2cmebkE4pNFaVuZP73Hn6QrKhRfJ6fKA V+9UzScPqEgtbKWrbkkco5x3SaECfpmKjA7fsKqDWHEffVQKEL6PqYmLuYKN8UBfKB RRs0cZpVz8/yarT56mWWSB2rEAK/nTs2qg16QTh4= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from tapas ([83.215.252.215]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MfpOT-1hdZBB0bjV-00gEUl; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 22:45:52 +0200 Received: by tapas (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2497C340673; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 22:45:43 +0200 (CEST) From: enno To: Stefan Kangas In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:27:09 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#20747: 24.4; emacs24 seems to become unresponsive after having been iconised References: <20190930204546.6227E340D0D@tapas> Message-Id: <20191001204543.2497C340673@tapas> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 22:45:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ADmEztFvi5SxVNaXwEyWCpshxoNCxfR3RmGvEbEDrAoQCdg43Ih KwPTojQPb3HpyslH0tVI0z8bvYhKJJaiJlF51gl4wjgeNhCtF4GUijD9BrvUijVgtf8+BIT uGxloj2C23ztozny+PczUrtyXLMUfXE1i8Nml96g2V9Po3N7RTkMUQwx7Ri56rp+K6aQBeT GvLUXvfnZL2uiNmVbdAYw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:a2AB1u4ZkZ8=:aQnUB/hDE7ECAGYGf5zN18 EihmpUs39xKIpUIcPcazgbmkA+MHZfs46FoUKuQl1ScHkEbqFHBdD/FxDa4sxSOHs07SA7RQ6 RdJ83byiEm2HsvCGuyTB2XQWuSHjJruiRlSol8yIuOsCFm0f4v7yuth75rk01cEJjjJUuWEES emix5syAp3VN+OshwZhR+t6vyrpUz16md32bo2Gr5y/DH7itLiqv6T1nVfkSOxnMGPtg3GouB 4t2CEnMTpUn+vdyxsh/W+CGUOmXZcMO4t+QzT3+/bZuyrR6RbiQdU/eABkIgRql49DvIxfBNQ aJa+34GAORVXjA6XkxHjfOFjZ0IjOPkReDBXYNYg/yOrByuAT+WbdAXAKMrEE8n6q7YucHPO6 igoI5LDv5UdvB1l2zIJ0UA+bUFl76haxY5ResK843mGL2axr2g9FMAm0qVr7H85uz4tojcTSJ 5LOYJ7oaHH6rXvhFpHheqiDR8aFUxK33h8Y5tTdilK5CzGFCrfaAAvOrHxAJaIHn0Y9GiHgGn djdrnC2gesCSmrzhT03vn1koacoAvnRhYbZ6uUt/7sbnMwHBqzs1Zr74VtC1zjDAu74hv/l0i ZnxVhNt/cvhjxQFmWXU7jK9YZOTDSBtWfqJn0aBlXGYBg3HAauMpap3hVc+BlJXUpE6wMxpq+ sqGr91dgagNqCm6/jXMgck30s5Xf8/xoqC0ps2Y1lMp9Lg1Wjr48BFVd6w1AUAeWUxqz3q6Lr Jn2gKcnaFeEWFZGpjeLhWQKHUyRFpK9bFtJqvZ3YljvZUXVdtVBVj/HwuC11mLX7TKJdHj1zf dw+06CiI65OzXZfRzVwNITU7J5to9cDTCWWraPQA1PVoGOrCPmWcm1/VaXkeUzWgB1FaV3Z8g B3GkXemh1znByKR3bW1Pgoj/xuaSyYqSUhG/oyAf3/6q0Q8IWbGBN5OvDx5It2yvHkGGNKXjE MgyPS1MWlDLC7NxzM7ppL5mboUb3wluGqu4VYFuGgSsQo3u9QPtB7VyshsxlW9GYATHXIdGa9 4T0BU/4FJtUzgIkMWXCkM7aBNcWVko91g06aUQPAnd/pZ9yfptCEdiXHa4l0/7b6ZeBL2fIMt LP+/XDglN4xJwH3C6Jwo7kAPGGv3+I99Tsf/cAG6IYiUEwSu6w894KSKjteNkUmC0RjPbsebC swZTW5Hor34D3cRvNxCcHaHyLIwfjePb2FEEUDKe2eKILUpwm4FXh3faLpQwr6FDk2Ep0JdKn HBbETdr81JMoGgfcc26QberCVOxQtM5uXaxORtw== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20747 Cc: 20747@debbugs.gnu.org, mbork@mbork.pl X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >>>>> "Stefan Kangas" =3D=3D Stefan Kangas writes: > enno writes: >> [...] the problem is partly still present: >> Emacs doesn't react to keyboard entries after having been >> minimized via C-z [...] > > Thanks for reporting back. Can you reproduce this when running > "emacs -Q"? Slight difference: Emacs doesn't react to keyboard entries after having been minimized via C-= z BUT C-x C-f then goes into the minibuffer to find a file (without the -Q= option it opens a gtk open file dialog). And after switching buffers, se= e see, the keyboard entries all of a sudden are there in the previous (for= merly 'blocked') buffer. > Could you give a detailed recipe for how to > reproduce it? Launch (|call|execute|run) emacs under xorg, type C-z (that is in emacs-ta= lk: hold control key and press z key--this is supposed to minimize emacs i= nto a symbol tray status or suchlike). Then hit M-tab (hold Alt (|Meta) k= ey and press Tab key once, this is supposed I suppose in most window manag= ers to switch to the most recent other window, so it should bring the mini= mized emacs back to front and focus). Hit keys sdfghjk (or whatever)--not= hing happens in the buffer, it looks as if emacs was hung, and so it was i= n the past when I first posted this bug report. > Could you please also say which window manager you are using? enlightenment, in version 0.22.4 > Best regards, Stefan Kangas Hope this helps, anyway the problem is negligible now i guess. Brgds, enno. =2D- // enno.vet@gmx.net /\\\ Mag. Enno Deimel .\ o \\ \ _ \ Wisely and slow; they stumble that run fast. \\\ \_/ gpg-fp: eefe b049 6fe6 fc0b 0ec4 f39e af6a c178 eb98 909a From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 02 05:51:24 2019 Received: (at 20747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2019 09:51:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35425 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFbI1-0000Fz-SW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 05:51:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:42929) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFbI0-0000Fj-88 for 20747@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 05:51:20 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f169.google.com with SMTP id q12so10043929pff.9 for <20747@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 02:51:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mjs+07BDTwjgiIxeiRMBgXHabOZlLY/y6IZYLz5Ty6k=; b=aTjRv2YE4FsL+G0DY0GgReHpwtbHqkqqFfu/j+B6l3cvls/elLz0Hwpy6oVWgr93Er QU77BpMjATbdkpd0+oStgz/h1FnkbreMTS1CrUqPKO8rgab9yGgP/syyjz1/+xNt38ty T9fhQOoE9TQMEO6dXiITEDEbTwinqlEZbh7TGXXl7VCRI9kBomjv9oFBy589PRmWIa9P nuBbK8RLyloH9dVNrtLzyc6ewCxjHWJu0yGrSXNhbYbORGHAZhh+SbsT+0Qmh0sRzjlI dzhvwUJ8dCoaXv0VVMZYq/SqGmoiPpZvpgMi5/cOYkrNN52i6LqEehcMWDMy/bI0F+/H O0NQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVPro2wz6Taa2j3hn3su9QfYlzwrA0v6LuYCcthS3j4ts9SUs5P aVoNHppf6p0juoQALl9Yx7ZymrGzHK+4ldZJdno= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqytiz/jIqRi/04NR37evfGUypBQpWc1WaKjJY3ruGlfcU4qCuiMy7r3ZQDIwjfyW8ukngNgau+gCFGA+azYbGA= X-Received: by 2002:a63:720f:: with SMTP id n15mr2753173pgc.198.1570009874207; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 02:51:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190930204546.6227E340D0D@tapas> <20191001204543.2497C340673@tapas> In-Reply-To: <20191001204543.2497C340673@tapas> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 11:51:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#20747: 24.4; emacs24 seems to become unresponsive after having been iconised To: enno Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20747 Cc: 20747@debbugs.gnu.org, Marcin Borkowski X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) enno writes: > > Thanks for reporting back. Can you reproduce this when running > > "emacs -Q"? > > Slight difference: > Emacs doesn't react to keyboard entries after having been minimized via C= -z BUT C-x C-f then goes into the minibuffer to find a file (without the -Q= option it opens a gtk open file dialog). And after switching buffers, see= see, the keyboard entries all of a sudden are there in the previous (forme= rly 'blocked') buffer. > > > Could you give a detailed recipe for how to > > reproduce it? > > Launch (|call|execute|run) emacs under xorg, type C-z (that is in emacs-t= alk: hold control key and press z key--this is supposed to minimize emacs i= nto a symbol tray status or suchlike). Then hit M-tab (hold Alt (|Meta) ke= y and press Tab key once, this is supposed I suppose in most window manager= s to switch to the most recent other window, so it should bring the minimiz= ed emacs back to front and focus). Hit keys sdfghjk (or whatever)--nothing= happens in the buffer, it looks as if emacs was hung, and so it was in the= past when I first posted this bug report. OK. I guess the next step would be to see what Emacs is doing while it is blocked. This would mean providing a C level backtrace using gdb. Could you provide such a backtrace? It's not very complicated, and the details on how to do it are in the file etc/DEBUG. AFAIU, if possible, it's best to do this from the current master branch. Second best is running the latest released Emacs version 26.3. Third best is to just use whatever you have installed and hope this code hasn't changed (that) much since. (Someone should correct me if I'm wrong about this.) > > Could you please also say which window manager you are using? > > enlightenment, in version 0.22.4 Thanks. One other thing you could try before trying to get a backtrace: Does your window manager have any special customization? Does it help using the default configuration instead? That might help to nail it down. > Hope this helps, anyway the problem is negligible now i guess. Does that mean that it's better now than before? If yes, how? Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 22 11:37:24 2020 Received: (at 20747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2020 15:37:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32935 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKkM8-00085K-CY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:37:24 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKkM7-000856-8w for 20747@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:37:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=62TDUDlZn+uz5rY6so+2v7WZkoL5P4NkaFBx2bnKfqs=; b=LZUd8qsY+1nChsmULXmKmj4ln6 M73A/m1yJO5mqPE+vX13fuZ8fXtWRfLu+JpQ11hC6hYVkzkWfTAfLUuncjvanZLXnCmZ1U4BqB943 EwjounsCGc8T/g6wL3dv7ILA7fQCO8ah1udNkgRUrRhvQEl18C0BSocSwkSzb/pQefBs=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kKkLy-0004Bc-UH; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:37:17 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#20747: 24.4; emacs24 seems to become unresponsive after having been iconised References: <20190930204546.6227E340D0D@tapas> <20191001204543.2497C340673@tapas> X-Now-Playing: Pet Shop Boys's _Bilingual_: "Electricity" Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:37:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 2 Oct 2019 11:51:01 +0200") Message-ID: <87pn6dg6vq.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: >> Hope this helps, anyway the problem is negligible now i guess. > > Does that mean that it's better now than before? If yes, how? More information was requested some months ago, but none was received, so I'm closing this bug report. If this is still a problem, please respond to the debbugs mail address, and we'll reopen. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20747 Cc: 20747@debbugs.gnu.org, enno , Marcin Borkowski X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: >> Hope this helps, anyway the problem is negligible now i guess. > > Does that mean that it's better now than before? If yes, how? More information was requested some months ago, but none was received, so I'm closing this bug report. If this is still a problem, please respond to the debbugs mail address, and we'll reopen. (I'm also unable to reproduce the bug in Emacs 28 under Debian bullseye.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 22 11:37:32 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2020 15:37:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32938 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKkMG-00085g-KZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:37:32 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33178) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKkMF-00085U-41 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:37:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=g2sVrsT0ieV8Dg5idsGLbrTXTbkLru4SCXZKcX1csss=; b=REnOt9C0hYoTnOmQb5ALxPun0G /IhHhwtNf0Lrb9FcpK0rMcDPquT9G5j2sFRB6FqtYdBsJbWAqA6FnLyp5np2AP+iB7v9H9Znoqibc Zu4C7C/ElPEaevKvkEmnSxozcdkU8xaStGnsUUUOodRxMy3MwCbVVqcV9j4sgXGRCzNk=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kKkM7-0004Bp-E5 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:37:25 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:37:22 +0200 Message-Id: <87o8lxg6vh.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #20747 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 20747 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 20747 quit From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:39:36 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator