GNU bug report logs - #20746
problem with non-LBA fat16

Previous Next

Full log

Message #8 received at 20746 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Phil Susi <psusi <at> ubuntu.com>
To: George Hicken <george.hicken <at> gmail.com>, 20746 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20746: problem with non-LBA fat16
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:21:07 -0400

On 6/5/2015 1:36 PM, George Hicken wrote:
> Requested output prior to partitioning
>
> Error: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label
> Error: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label
> Error: /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label
> Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sdb: 8590MB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Table: unknown
> Disk Flags:
> Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sdb: 16777216s
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Table: unknown
> Disk Flags:
> Model: VMware Virtual disk (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sdb: 1044,85,0
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> BIOS cylinder,head,sector geometry: 1044,255,63.  Each cylinder is 8225kB.
> Partition Table: unknown
> Disk Flags:

What are the exact commands that lead to this?  What does parted 
/dev/sdb print show?  What does fdisk show?

> Using the parted supplied with tinycorelinux 6.x (reports as 3.1) to create

Please try again with 3.2.

> an MBT, create a primary fat16 parition with non-lba addressing
>     /usr/local/sbin/parted -a cylinder -s /dev/sdb --  mklabel msdos mkpart
> primary fat16 1cyl 40MiB

Do you mean to say that this is the command that produced the above output?

> This produces a partition of type 0xe, but otherwise it's what we want -
> interestingly parted print command doesn't detail the parition type, it's
> all blank. Using "set 1 lba off" then does something entirely unexpected.
> Using fdisk to inspect the partition table the type has switched to 0x83.
>
> I took a quick look at the code and 0x83 appears to be the default fstype
> if none is set. Why this happens when setting lba off on a fat16 partition
> I have no idea.

This is because as you noted, 0x83 is the default type.  Since you did 
not actually format a fat16 filesystem within the partition, parted 
can't detect any filesystem there and so does not know that it should 
use the type code for fat16.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.