GNU bug report logs - #20733
coreutils build problem

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 19:18:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Michael Felt <mamfelt <at> gmail.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Cc: 20733 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>, "bug-autoconf <at> gnu.org" <bug-autoconf <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#20733: coreutils build problem
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 15:15:13 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This is reassuring. Thank you for the reply.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com> wrote:

> On 06/05/2015 04:45 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
>
> [we tend to avoid top-posting on technical lists, as it makes it harder
> to follow the flow of the message]
>
> > My "fear" is that autoconf has introduced this "catch-all" as I have been
> > running into it more frequently of late (first time was last November
> when
> > I took my first attempt at packaging gcc.)
> >
>
> Paul's patch was specific to a coreutils file.  So far, I have not seen
> any evidence of autoconf introducing 'for x in ;' anywhere in configure.
>  If you are seeing the same problem in multiple packages, so far it is
> because each package has made a similar mistake in their local
> configuration files.
>
> > I shall look at the patch and let you know - however, regardless of
> whether
> > it works or not - is this something that autoconf is introducing, read
> > changed - requiring you to make a patch. If so, while from autoconf
> > perspective all may be well - it is not very user-friendly. (I just do
> not
> > understand autoconf well enough to make that distinction).
>
> If the syntax error is in autoconf.ac or in Makefile.am, then it is the
> package that wrote the file at fault.  If the syntax error is not in
> anything the package provides, but appears in the generated configure
> file, then it is more likely to be in automake or autoconf.
>
> --
> Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 10 years and 49 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.