GNU bug report logs - #20733
coreutils build problem

Previous Next

Full log

Message #49 received at 20733 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Felt <mamfelt <at> gmail.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Cc: 20733 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>,
 "bug-autoconf <at> gnu.org" <bug-autoconf <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#20733: coreutils build problem
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:45:14 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

My "fear" is that autoconf has introduced this "catch-all" as I have been
running into it more frequently of late (first time was last November when
I took my first attempt at packaging gcc.)

I shall look at the patch and let you know - however, regardless of whether
it works or not - is this something that autoconf is introducing, read
changed - requiring you to make a patch. If so, while from autoconf
perspective all may be well - it is not very user-friendly. (I just do not
understand autoconf well enough to make that distinction).

Thanks for looking! and listening!!

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com> wrote:

> [adding autoconf]
>
> On 06/04/2015 01:17 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> >
> > On 06/04/2015 09:41 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
> >>   GEN      src/coreutils.h
> >> /bin/sh: 0403-057 Syntax error at line 1 : `;' is not expected.
> >
>
> > Port to POSIX shell, which doesn't allow 'for i in ; do ...'.
>
> Actually, POSIX _does_ allow for missing words between 'in' and the
> terminator (; or newline) before 'do' (whether by a word that expands to
> nothing, or by omission of words), requiring that the body of the for
> statement is skipped in that case:
>
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_09_04
>
> But it is also true that older shells did not always follow this rule,
> so you are indeed better off always supplying at least one word that
> won't be expanded into nothingness.
>
> Hmmm, I thought that autoconf would document it as a portability
> pitfall, but I don't see it under 'for' in this link:
>
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf.html#Limitations-of-Builtins
>
> --
> Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.