GNU bug report logs - #2062
PATH can contain non-expanded variables

Previous Next

Packages: w32, emacs;

Reported by: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:10:04 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Found in version 23.0.60

Done: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 2062 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jasonr <at> f2s.com
Subject: bug#2062: PATH can contain non-expanded variables
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:55:09 +0100
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 20:30, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> What was the use-case that caused Path to include unexpanded
> environment variables in your case?

In *my* case, I run several instances of Emacs, and I put different
binaries (image libraries, etc.) in several directories, pointed to by
one environment variable. I always start Emacs from the command line,
and I set the environment variable according to which Emacs I want to
run and what additional binaries to use. I have the App Path set to
C:\emacs\%myvar%\bin, where %myvar% points to the relevant dir.

But my use case is not important: there are many ways to do what I do,
and I'm not even claiming mine is optimal, or close to it.

If I want to fix that (or work around it, if it is a Windows bug) is
because certainly there's nothing precluding the user from setting a
REG_EXPAND_SZ for PATH, or EMACSPATH or EMACSLOADPATH, and there seems
to be no downside to this change, unless we deem
C:\this\is%myweird%path\to\file likely.

But this does not merit too long a discussion IMO. Either you (all)
think it's useful, or hackish. Your call.

    Juanma




This bug report was last modified 16 years and 175 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.