GNU bug report logs - #20538
24.4; Attempt to delete a surrogate minibuffer frame

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Roland Winkler" <winkler <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 19:36:03 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.4

Done: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
To: Roland Winkler <winkler <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 20538 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20538: 24.4; Attempt to delete a surrogate minibuffer frame
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:32:11 +0200
> How do you use the undocumented function ediff-setup-windows-plain?
> (Could this usage be properly documented?)

It's an option (a customizable variable).  Do

M-: (require 'ediff) RET

C-h v RET ediff-window-setup-function RET

> Sure.  I was more thinking that quite generally the error message
> talking about a "surrogate minibuffer frame" is a bit confusing if
> one has no clue what this term means.  When I first saw this
> message, I thought of something like a "minibuffer frame" that was
> some kind of surrogate (which was why I thought this was supposed to
> refer to the Ediff control panel that acts like a minibuffer for an
> ediff session).
>
> Perhaps the error message could be changed to something like
>
>    "Attempt to delete frame with a surrogate minibuffer for frame XYZ"

Maybe we should say in the documentation of `delete-frame' something
like

  A frame may not be deleted if its minibuffer serves as surrogate
  minibuffer for another frame.

martin




This bug report was last modified 10 years and 9 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.