GNU bug report logs -
#20538
24.4; Attempt to delete a surrogate minibuffer frame
Previous Next
Reported by: "Roland Winkler" <winkler <at> gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 19:36:03 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in version 24.4
Done: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> How do you use the undocumented function ediff-setup-windows-plain?
> (Could this usage be properly documented?)
It's an option (a customizable variable). Do
M-: (require 'ediff) RET
C-h v RET ediff-window-setup-function RET
> Sure. I was more thinking that quite generally the error message
> talking about a "surrogate minibuffer frame" is a bit confusing if
> one has no clue what this term means. When I first saw this
> message, I thought of something like a "minibuffer frame" that was
> some kind of surrogate (which was why I thought this was supposed to
> refer to the Ediff control panel that acts like a minibuffer for an
> ediff session).
>
> Perhaps the error message could be changed to something like
>
> "Attempt to delete frame with a surrogate minibuffer for frame XYZ"
Maybe we should say in the documentation of `delete-frame' something
like
A frame may not be deleted if its minibuffer serves as surrogate
minibuffer for another frame.
martin
This bug report was last modified 10 years and 9 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.