GNU bug report logs - #20538
24.4; Attempt to delete a surrogate minibuffer frame

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Roland Winkler" <winkler <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 19:36:03 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.4

Done: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #32 received at 20538 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Roland Winkler" <winkler <at> gnu.org>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Cc: 20538 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20538: 24.4; Attempt to delete a surrogate minibuffer frame
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:42:36 -0500
On Tue May 12 2015 martin rudalics wrote:
> Such things happen to me all the time.  That's why I prefer
> `ediff-setup-windows-plain' (and `split-window-horizontally' as
> `ediff-split-window-function').

How do you use the undocumented function ediff-setup-windows-plain?
(Could this usage be properly documented?)

> The problem is that the entity that issues the message is not aware of
> the intrinsics of ediff.

Sure.  I was more thinking that quite generally the error message
talking about a "surrogate minibuffer frame" is a bit confusing if
one has no clue what this term means.  When I first saw this
message, I thought of something like a "minibuffer frame" that was
some kind of surrogate (which was why I thought this was supposed to
refer to the Ediff control panel that acts like a minibuffer for an
ediff session).

Perhaps the error message could be changed to something like

  "Attempt to delete frame with a surrogate minibuffer for frame XYZ"




This bug report was last modified 10 years and 9 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.