GNU bug report logs - #20533
25.0.50; doc string of `other-buffer': FRAME

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 17:34:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 25.0.50

Done: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20533: closed (25.0.50; doc string of `other-buffer': FRAME)
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 09:50:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 20 May 2015 11:49:39 +0200
with message-id <555C58B3.3080001 <at> gmx.at>
and subject line Re: bug#20533: 25.0.50; doc string of `other-buffer': FRAME
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #20533,
regarding 25.0.50; doc string of `other-buffer': FRAME
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
20533: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20533
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 25.0.50; doc string of `other-buffer': FRAME
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 10:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
The description in (elisp)Buffer List is OK.  But the doc string is not.
The doc string says:
 If the optional third argument FRAME is non-nil, use that frame's...
It is meaningless to say "that frame" - what frame?

It should say something like what the manual says.  E.g., "... use
FRAME's...".  Or (better) "If non-nil, FRAME is the frame used...".
IOW, non-nil is not enough; FRAME must be a frame if not nil.


In GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32)
 of 2014-10-20 on LEG570
Bzr revision: 118168 rgm <at> gnu.org-20141020195941-icp42t8ttcnud09g
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Configured using:
 `configure --enable-checking=yes,glyphs CPPFLAGS=-DGLYPH_DEBUG=1'


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>, 20533-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#20533: 25.0.50; doc string of `other-buffer': FRAME
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 11:49:39 +0200
> The description in (elisp)Buffer List is OK.  But the doc string is not.
> The doc string says:
>   If the optional third argument FRAME is non-nil, use that frame's...
> It is meaningless to say "that frame" - what frame?
>
> It should say something like what the manual says.  E.g., "... use
> FRAME's...".  Or (better) "If non-nil, FRAME is the frame used...".
> IOW, non-nil is not enough; FRAME must be a frame if not nil.

Should be fixed with commit 31d58d4..0c5fa36 on master/trunk.
Bug closed.

Thanks for the report, martin


This bug report was last modified 10 years and 62 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.