From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 05 04:15:36 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2015 08:15:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34304 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpY0t-0008FF-VT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 04:15:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35616) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpY0r-0008Ep-2x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 04:15:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpY0f-0000jn-Sm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 04:15:27 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:33995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpY0f-0000jj-Q0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 04:15:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49087) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpY0Z-00040r-W6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 04:15:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpY0Z-0000iU-44 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 04:15:15 -0400 Received: from smtp10.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.132]:17922 helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpY0Y-0000hM-Ux for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 04:15:15 -0400 Received: from localhost ([82.123.30.187]) by mwinf5d19 with ME id Q8F91q00G42Dy42038F9bM; Tue, 05 May 2015 10:15:10 +0200 X-ME-Helo: localhost X-ME-Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 10:15:10 +0200 X-ME-IP: 82.123.30.187 Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 10:06:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20150505.100641.159216149369481177.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.0.50 eieio and packages depending on it From: Pierre Lorenzon X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 25.0.50 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: zappo@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hi, I already posted two bug reports 20467 and 20491 but each time I correct something I get a new error. Last time it was an error in srecode dictionaries. Anyway I suspect that eieio implementation has been change without doing necessary modification in codes that use eieio. surely it is very time consuming and people who are responsible for that ahd no time to do it. Surely it is absolutley normal for a development version not to be fully functional. Anyway I wonder why my bug report 20647 where I proposed patches to correct some errors got no answer. Time problem probably. But if you need help for the eieio stuff please simply tell me. I think I am able to contribute to that. But please tell me more precisely which are the goals so that I do not make something that is not in the spec ! Or simply tell me if there's a good place to know what has to be done with the eieio project and all its dependencies. Regards Pierre From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 05 14:57:27 2015 Received: (at 20507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2015 18:57:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35538 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ypi23-0000zc-3G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 14:57:27 -0400 Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:39903) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ypi20-0000zP-JJ for 20507@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 14:57:25 -0400 Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4450985095; Tue, 5 May 2015 14:57:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BF81E5B8D; Tue, 5 May 2015 14:56:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7CFE5B41A0; Tue, 5 May 2015 14:56:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Pierre Lorenzon Subject: Re: bug#20507: 25.0.50 eieio and packages depending on it Message-ID: References: <20150505.100641.159216149369481177.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 14:56:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150505.100641.159216149369481177.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> (Pierre Lorenzon's message of "Tue, 05 May 2015 10:06:41 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.49, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_REPONSE 0.33, MC_TSTLAST 0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20507 Cc: zappo@gnu.org, 20507@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) > I already posted two bug reports 20467 and 20491 but each time > I correct something I get a new error. I'm sorry about that. When I installed those changes in EIEIO there were a few bugs reported, but since then, it's been fairly quiet, so I was under the impression that things are mostly OK. > Anyway I suspect that eieio implementation has been change > without doing necessary modification in codes that use > eieio. I did test the new code against CEDET's use, but in only fairly limited ways (mostly, enabling semantic-mode and using it to perform completion on a struct field name in regex.c). > Anyway I wonder why my bug report 20647 where I proposed patches to > correct some errors got no answer. Time problem probably. Yup. Have you had a chance to try my reply in bug#20491? > But if you need help for the eieio stuff please simply tell me. Please do send more of those bug reports and (especially) patches. Recipes to reproduce those problems are also very welcome (test cases to add to test/automated are even better), since in many cases I have no idea how the code is supposed to be used. > I think I am able to contribute to that. But please tell me > more precisely which are the goals so that I do not make > something that is not in the spec ! Or simply tell me if > there's a good place to know what has to be done with the eieio > project and all its dependencies. Mostly what needs to be done is to make sure that old code still works, and when it doesn't decide whether it should be fixed by changing EIEIO to be more bug-compatible or by changing the old code. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 05 20:58:30 2015 Received: (at 20507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2015 00:58:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35751 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpnfS-0002kr-5t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 20:58:30 -0400 Received: from mail-vn0-f49.google.com ([209.85.216.49]:37029) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YpnfP-0002kc-Sv for 20507@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 20:58:28 -0400 Received: by vnbg129 with SMTP id g129so18391745vnb.4 for <20507@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 05 May 2015 17:58:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=78DwYUsVXMrppkc3VckL7RquYJ7aKqUSW0t+LJqmf/8=; b=eUCpP7oU2hSgPhqT+rSKTesAwjuyRoFx4jaO3FpCH3wMnjapmIRN8vc153j7c3fm2r xFxbwkIOhzIQMFZX3tNPvC6PbiUsvQs8JIoqx6Nj3g8uhTSwEdmm9/xU8+V5e5kk5mpD 3DZ00lGZOo/8vIEnv4SLu6hfuaxRrglf7weV5ihbY1JIIBasrifGW1GWfbduuudvC5w9 WtnNyvJVVmtna7wYcCedsMh9GQm4+6LN+Fu0cRTpQXl/I3N6KarYNZMFE+GuxdmGCpa2 8j8kdD23dxEkfKQ5ES3wCcT17TjjITuOlWAcCRbOcIcDYYqs4KM2bBGMtWDAfkyHhbTu /40g== X-Received: by 10.52.101.131 with SMTP id fg3mr33683603vdb.82.1430873902041; Tue, 05 May 2015 17:58:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.202] (pool-71-184-198-118.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [71.184.198.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j9sm38678vdi.28.2015.05.05.17.58.20 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 May 2015 17:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5549672B.6090601@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 20:58:19 -0400 From: Eric Ludlam User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Monnier , Pierre Lorenzon Subject: Re: bug#20507: 25.0.50 eieio and packages depending on it References: <20150505.100641.159216149369481177.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20507 Cc: zappo@gnu.org, 20507@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On 05/05/2015 02:56 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> >I think I am able to contribute to that. But please tell me >> >more precisely which are the goals so that I do not make >> >something that is not in the spec ! Or simply tell me if >> >there's a good place to know what has to be done with the eieio >> >project and all its dependencies. > Mostly what needs to be done is to make sure that old code still works, > and when it doesn't decide whether it should be fixed by changing EIEIO > to be more bug-compatible or by changing the old code. > Hi Stefan, CEDET has an extensive test suite, but most of it hasn't been merged into Emacs' tests. I suspect the easiest way for you to get some good coverage is to pull CEDET from the sourceforge repository, build it using your development version of Emacs, and then do: make utest-batch and when that works make itest-batch The unit tests were failing for me with Emacs 25 a couple months back and I fixed a bunch of issues to make it work with some of the planned changes to eieio. I'm not sure where it stands today as I haven't had time to mess with it recently. The tests include all the tools that use eieio, and exercise a wide range of features from Semantic's completion to the SRecode insertion macros. If you pass these tests, I'd have high confidence your eieio changes are in good shape. The unit tests usually only take a minute or so, but the interactive tests can take several minutes. The tests require you have many external tools installed which I assume you do, such as make, automake, gcc, and a few other things. Eric From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 06 00:06:04 2015 Received: (at 20507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2015 04:06:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35788 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ypqaw-0000MP-9A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2015 00:06:03 -0400 Received: from smtp08.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.130]:36545 helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ypqat-0000M4-Ub for 20507@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2015 00:06:00 -0400 Received: from localhost ([82.123.30.187]) by mwinf5d67 with ME id QU5t1q00942Dy4203U5tXE; Wed, 06 May 2015 06:05:54 +0200 X-ME-Helo: localhost X-ME-Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 06:05:54 +0200 X-ME-IP: 82.123.30.187 Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 05:57:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20150506.055724.1853671181332540254.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Subject: Re: bug#20507: 25.0.50 eieio and packages depending on it From: Pierre Lorenzon In-Reply-To: References: <20150505.100641.159216149369481177.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 25.0.50 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20507 Cc: zappo@gnu.org, 20507@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Hi Stefan Thanks for your answer. From: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#20507: 25.0.50 eieio and packages depending on it Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 14:56:56 -0400 >> I already posted two bug reports 20467 and 20491 but each time >> I correct something I get a new error. > > I'm sorry about that. When I installed those changes in EIEIO there were > a few bugs reported, but since then, it's been fairly quiet, so I was > under the impression that things are mostly OK. Unfortunately it is maybe not exactly the case and there is still things to improve. Anyway I cannot say how much there's to do. In fact I discover the bugs each one after another. > >> Anyway I suspect that eieio implementation has been change >> without doing necessary modification in codes that use >> eieio. > > I did test the new code against CEDET's use, but in only fairly limited > ways (mostly, enabling semantic-mode and using it to perform completion > on a struct field name in regex.c). OK That's why bugs in ede implementation for instance have not been detected. Anyway I'll continu to track them ! > >> Anyway I wonder why my bug report 20647 where I proposed patches to >> correct some errors got no answer. Time problem probably. > > Yup. Have you had a chance to try my reply in bug#20491? Yes I did the modification to the code that you suggested and it fixed the bug at this place. > >> But if you need help for the eieio stuff please simply tell me. > > Please do send more of those bug reports and (especially) patches. > Recipes to reproduce those problems are also very welcome (test cases > to add to test/automated are even better), since in many cases I have no > idea how the code is supposed to be used. No problem I'll try to make the stuff work and send patches. > >> I think I am able to contribute to that. But please tell me >> more precisely which are the goals so that I do not make >> something that is not in the spec ! Or simply tell me if >> there's a good place to know what has to be done with the eieio >> project and all its dependencies. > > Mostly what needs to be done is to make sure that old code still works, > and when it doesn't decide whether it should be fixed by changing EIEIO > to be more bug-compatible or by changing the old code. OK > > > Stefan Thanks again Pierre From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 06 10:53:00 2015 Received: (at 20507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2015 14:53:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36387 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yq0h1-0002rZ-TJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2015 10:53:00 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:32370) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yq0gz-0002rL-MT for 20507@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2015 10:52:58 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnEFAGvvdVRFpYts/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOfQYIugQiBdQEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgTohGLeGwJAQIBAoM+AxABBgQBg1QEo2OEWA X-IPAS-Result: AnEFAGvvdVRFpYts/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOfQYIugQiBdQEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgTohGLeGwJAQIBAoM+AxABBgQBg1QEo2OEWA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,557,1422939600"; d="scan'208";a="118430304" Received: from 69-165-139-108.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.139.108]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 May 2015 10:52:52 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6A6122214; Wed, 6 May 2015 10:52:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Eric Ludlam Subject: Re: bug#20507: 25.0.50 eieio and packages depending on it Message-ID: References: <20150505.100641.159216149369481177.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> <5549672B.6090601@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 10:52:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5549672B.6090601@gmail.com> (Eric Ludlam's message of "Tue, 05 May 2015 20:58:19 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20507 Cc: zappo@gnu.org, Pierre Lorenzon , 20507@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) > CEDET has an extensive test suite, but most of it hasn't been merged into > Emacs' tests. I suspect the easiest way for you to get some good coverage > is to pull CEDET from the sourceforge repository, build it using your > development version of Emacs, and then do: Thanks, that sounds very helpful. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 28 20:51:59 2016 Received: (at 20507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2016 00:51:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49799 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSw1u-0008QE-T0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 20:51:59 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:35445) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSw1s-0008Ps-Lb; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 20:51:56 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f46.google.com with SMTP id u186so181966374ita.0; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:51:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=bFh5wnkd0TwkeP3M/0VNKuOqBkOcbNkledNUs5i0M/E=; b=wUPmQ3sAjNEjtZozzT/4QmmoUnVGp34b92XeNSIppKrwLyntHlQ2w7A+5ecPloyBlv 0Tnb7IMEDQkeuwxK5x8Gu5qlOimrPGRlvCRjD2X8hWCvec57qaLYW3XYNAOym4ZXqQz1 jZcZYk57uKvQTyyCwFFaaEzWVbt+k72M7e+7C040nepDDRxkVWIOI1Mv0Q08VMSo8lc9 55uHy6VRKhvmvtiWTLQvgjYNX3JzXBl99xbQ0HfyMXYODGPGyShILjCeJAICVWSqHHBz XnSMFNmE+vlehuV11pd9hiMh/jtzlRhIPEa1Y6PaxT/lwPWiUrFjf29jq1hp7mitlW/D YaCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=bFh5wnkd0TwkeP3M/0VNKuOqBkOcbNkledNUs5i0M/E=; b=dEHb27vWVVjxEgQ1Jj/klRpCgQBo9Z5nknKYtSGuEcBQ1J7BHV638UbVxLanTwj4NX v9Haaew1LAOa9cC4GW3R1CpRJMATpf/ctBPtyQHn374nRgNuGxAY5u2UcuY3XrzSiBs4 7jBQETugE3Ucv/DDIGCZ4NvVDGOXCUSQAczfe4OwkFqJPwtgxyWzc/8xPg+CVIWkYQ6h QP4gHWQZ9Pugt/DHi/Om1JSbqHqbA9CrHVb9L3Grz8oyqdEZgsED6o45W91rnIhncaa4 jNFEn6YLT+N/wroOj7dnzm2521TB4U8SlTz3C4bqfHIv/i23xpKEWTvh2iyYTDGI35Z/ rZ1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousB1XPcd89jJRNKbyA+dcv8d0qcUMHWeKRadiAe3PN/oK2pMWBAkFlLElsWthQ5dA== X-Received: by 10.36.79.9 with SMTP id c9mr44180797itb.28.1469753511177; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zony (206-188-64-44.cpe.distributel.net. [206.188.64.44]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c40sm6151384iod.6.2016.07.28.17.51.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:51:50 -0700 (PDT) From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Pierre Lorenzon Subject: Re: bug#20507: 25.0.50 eieio and packages depending on it References: <20150505.100641.159216149369481177.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 20:51:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150505.100641.159216149369481177.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> (Pierre Lorenzon's message of "Tue, 05 May 2015 10:06:41 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <878twlb710.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20507 Cc: zappo@gnu.org, 20507@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) close 20507 quit Closing since there's no actual bug reported here. I think this would have been better as an emacs-devel thread. From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:49:24 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator