GNU bug report logs - #20484
25.0.50; Directory tracking in ansi-term broken.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
Cc: 20484 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>, 20202 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Phillip Lord <phillip.lord <at> russet.org.uk>
Subject: bug#20484: bug#20202: Considered Harmful 73d213: 'Comint, term, and compile new set Emacs'
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 20:30:50 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Stefan Monnier wrote:
> "Do the trick" to get what, exactly?

It causes the predicate 'current_prolog_flag(emacs_inferior_process, X)' to 
succeed with X=true, and it causes SWI-Prolog to not attempt to put the terminal 
into raw mode. Although the former doesn't seem to do much of anything, latter 
affects the UI, notably the debugger. For example, SWI-Prolog 7.2.3 in Emacs 24 
under M-x run-prolog:

?- trace, member(X, [a,b,c]).
   Call: (8) lists:member(_G2, [a, b, c]) ? a
% Execution Aborted
?-

The same interaction in emacs-25 now:

1 ?- trace, member(X, [a,b,c]).
   Call: (8) lists:member(_G2, [a, b, c]) ? a
abort
% Execution Aborted
2 ?-

I suppose the differences might be annoying to someone who does a lot of Prolog 
debugging. To give some perspective, although I am annoyed whenever I have to 
debug GNU Prolog under Emacs due to gprolog's mishandling of tty modes under 
Emacs, this is something I've never gotten sufficiently annoyed at to fix, even 
though it's been ten years since I first ran afoul of it.

One possible workaround would be something like the attached patch, which relies 
on SWI-Prolog's behavior of assuming GNU Emacs when INFERIOR=yes in the environment.

[prolog.diff (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.