From unknown Sat Sep 06 02:33:01 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#20473 <20473@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#20473 <20473@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 11.88.4; AUCTeX-version incorrect Reply-To: bug#20473 <20473@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2025 09:33:01 +0000 retitle 20473 11.88.4; AUCTeX-version incorrect reassign 20473 auctex submitter 20473 jfbu severity 20473 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 30 12:04:37 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2015 16:04:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57740 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ynqx2-0003fc-KQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:04:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55714) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ynqx0-0003fO-0n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:04:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ynqwu-0006KF-4i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:04:28 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:51962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ynqwu-0006KA-1q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:04:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40943) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ynqwq-0006TX-8l for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:04:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ynqwk-0006DA-Ke for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:04:24 -0400 Received: from smtp02.univ-lille1.fr ([2001:660:4401:100::20]:57592) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ynqwk-0006B1-AI for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:04:18 -0400 Received: from smtps1.univ-lille1.fr (smtps1.univ-lille1.fr [193.49.225.52]) by smtp02.univ-lille1.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t3UG4Iui018572 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:04:18 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.11] (hel59-4-88-160-125-12.fbx.proxad.net [88.160.125.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtps1.univ-lille1.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id t3UG4Fwa027590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:04:17 +0200 From: jfbu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: 11.88.4; AUCTeX-version incorrect Message-Id: Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:04:12 +0200 To: bug-auctex@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-USTL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-USTL-MailScanner-ID: t3UG4Iui018572 X-USTL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-USTL-MailScanner-From: jfbu@free.fr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hi, Emacs : GNU Emacs 24.5.3 (x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0, Carbon Version 157 = AppKit 1265.21) of 2015-04-11 on Atago.local Package: 11.88.4 installed via ELPA in .emacs.d/elpa/auctex-11.88.4/tex-site.el near the end (defconst AUCTeX-version "11.88.3" "AUCTeX version. If not a regular release, the date of the last change.") (defconst AUCTeX-date "2015-03-22" "AUCTeX release date using the ISO 8601 format, yyyy-mm-dd.") which appears incorrect as this is 11.88.4 Best Jean-Fran=E7ois From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 30 15:09:29 2015 Received: (at 20473-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2015 19:09:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yntpx-0002bT-5k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:09:29 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:41458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yntpu-0002bK-4I for 20473-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:09:27 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC812074C for <20473-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:09:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:09:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=FIqq1d59d+2WvO75KrQfOjNCOxQ=; b=r9HHQ MKungro8+8hrXBTyZ/UDyn3QOevfe9Mrx53naQRjdsv1waF8HQXzJSt48XuSmIZr GTD5JIDH6bCkbqCin7wkMHr8EDJ6iC56/yaK44D6M0C+R1TZ5wRZpEDE4WJlng2F sPDmBxu8Wi34oNo/Eoh47PNn3VxHv/cFtA3gzE= X-Sasl-enc: /o0ZOJ7Eb2VsrLnPNVFR/ykqntXX3Gyw4vekKGlvFlLz 1430420964 Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.163.116.45]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 560A6C00013; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:09:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Tassilo Horn To: jfbu Subject: Re: bug#20473: 11.88.4; AUCTeX-version incorrect References: Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:09:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: (jfbu@free.fr's message of "Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:04:12 +0200") Message-ID: <87pp6l8mce.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20473-done Cc: 20473-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) jfbu writes: > in .emacs.d/elpa/auctex-11.88.4/tex-site.el > > near the end > > (defconst AUCTeX-version "11.88.3" > "AUCTeX version. > If not a regular release, the date of the last change.") > > which appears incorrect as this is 11.88.4 Oh, indeed. I've overlooked that when doing the release. I'm closing this bug since it's harmless, and the best I could do was to release 11.88.5 whose only fix was a corrected version number. I guess that's not worth it. Bye, Tassilo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 01 04:59:53 2015 Received: (at 20473) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2015 08:59:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58093 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo6nZ-0003Rl-HI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 04:59:53 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:43537) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo6nX-0003Rc-1w for 20473@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 04:59:52 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3EC21468 for <20473@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 1 May 2015 04:59:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 01 May 2015 04:59:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=qeLk0nLtk8LrKpiXrKbaA7itR2k=; b=a68Fi bMr2GPGp215VmQcFAxhRhkwIzsZjYpHhHcg4a3cGCDzcOtFWAJ8hA5ArvW2UHhxx d/BGkqQ6DEEF9hnDg9beUH45vOKiGeBDe3UX4V+YTVwyuUOeiPdGMUnutmzUClLU Lr1m3N4iVoqg7ywrEo3OUcK8TkVj2C6IcetPgU= X-Sasl-enc: mdUgSCPIjNzr+M4oouNa2Dw1LLmQc35X1HGE3hkbqIHf 1430470789 Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.162.50.33]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6E632C00013; Fri, 1 May 2015 04:59:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Tassilo Horn To: 20473@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#20473: 11.88.4; AUCTeX-version incorrect References: <87pp6l8mce.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 10:59:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pp6l8mce.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:09:21 +0200") Message-ID: <87pp6kn059.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20473 Cc: jfbu@free.fr X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Tassilo Horn writes: > jfbu writes: > >> in .emacs.d/elpa/auctex-11.88.4/tex-site.el >> >> near the end >> >> (defconst AUCTeX-version "11.88.3" >> "AUCTeX version. >> If not a regular release, the date of the last change.") >> >> which appears incorrect as this is 11.88.4 > > Oh, indeed. I've overlooked that when doing the release. I'm closing > this bug since it's harmless, and the best I could do was to release > 11.88.5 whose only fix was a corrected version number. I guess that's > not worth it. Ok, 11.88.5 is pushed and should be on ELPA anytime soon. (It contains more changes than just version number. ;-)) Bye, Tassilo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 01 05:46:23 2015 Received: (at 20473) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2015 09:46:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58113 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo7WY-0004aP-N9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 05:46:23 -0400 Received: from smtp01.univ-lille1.fr ([193.49.225.19]:42415) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo7WV-0004aA-Su for 20473@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 05:46:20 -0400 Received: from smtps1.univ-lille1.fr (smtps1.univ-lille1.fr [193.49.225.52]) by smtp01.univ-lille1.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t419kCtI023149 for <20473@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 1 May 2015 11:46:12 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.11] (hel59-4-88-160-125-12.fbx.proxad.net [88.160.125.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtps1.univ-lille1.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id t419kBic016406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <20473@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 1 May 2015 11:46:13 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: bug#20473: 11.88.4; AUCTeX-version incorrect From: jfbu In-Reply-To: <87pp6kn059.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 11:46:10 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <87pp6l8mce.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp6kn059.fsf@gnu.org> To: 20473@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-USTL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-USTL-MailScanner-ID: t419kCtI023149 X-USTL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-USTL-MailScanner-From: jfbu@free.fr X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20473 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Le 1 mai 2015 =E0 10:59, Tassilo Horn a =E9crit : > Tassilo Horn writes: >=20 >> jfbu writes: >>=20 >>> in .emacs.d/elpa/auctex-11.88.4/tex-site.el >>>=20 >>> near the end >>>=20 >>> (defconst AUCTeX-version "11.88.3" >>> "AUCTeX version. >>> If not a regular release, the date of the last change.") >>>=20 >>> which appears incorrect as this is 11.88.4 >>=20 >> Oh, indeed. I've overlooked that when doing the release. I'm = closing >> this bug since it's harmless, and the best I could do was to release >> 11.88.5 whose only fix was a corrected version number. I guess = that's >> not worth it. >=20 > Ok, 11.88.5 is pushed and should be on ELPA anytime soon. (It = contains > more changes than just version number. ;-)) much appreciated ;-) I hesitated doing a bug report for such a thing... ... (11.8.2 also had it wrong, if I checked correctly yesterday) bye Jean-Fran=E7ois= From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 01 05:51:13 2015 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2015 09:51:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58117 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo7bF-0004iz-2h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 05:51:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53736) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo7bB-0004ij-VU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 05:51:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo7b5-00082D-Uk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 05:51:04 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo7b5-000827-RR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 05:51:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39003) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo7b4-000271-TP for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 05:51:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo7b1-00081F-Nw for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 05:51:02 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo7b1-00080P-Gp for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 05:50:59 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yo7ay-0006F1-HC for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 11:50:56 +0200 Received: from hel59-4-88-160-125-12.fbx.proxad.net ([88.160.125.12]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 May 2015 11:50:56 +0200 Received: from jfbu by hel59-4-88-160-125-12.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 May 2015 11:50:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-auctex@gnu.org From: jfbu Subject: Re: bug#20473: 11.88.4; AUCTeX-version incorrect Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 11:50:49 +0200 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <87pp6l8mce.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp6kn059.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hel59-4-88-160-125-12.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 In-Reply-To: <87pp6kn059.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) Le 01/05/2015 10:59, Tassilo Horn a écrit : > Tassilo Horn writes: > >> jfbu writes: >> >>> in .emacs.d/elpa/auctex-11.88.4/tex-site.el >>> >>> near the end >>> >>> (defconst AUCTeX-version "11.88.3" >>> "AUCTeX version. >>> If not a regular release, the date of the last change.") >>> >>> which appears incorrect as this is 11.88.4 >> >> Oh, indeed. I've overlooked that when doing the release. I'm closing >> this bug since it's harmless, and the best I could do was to release >> 11.88.5 whose only fix was a corrected version number. I guess that's >> not worth it. > > Ok, 11.88.5 is pushed and should be on ELPA anytime soon. (It contains > more changes than just version number. ;-)) > > Bye, > Tassilo > whow that's fast, I thought I would have to wait 24 hours but I right now I checked and indeed I could install 11.88.5 via ELPA. thanks Jean-François From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 02 16:28:31 2015 Received: (at 20473) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2015 20:28:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59995 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yoe1X-0006J9-2u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2015 16:28:31 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:45097) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yoe1U-0006Iz-GK for 20473@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2015 16:28:29 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EB920B69 for <20473@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 2 May 2015 16:28:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 02 May 2015 16:28:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=VjHdsp1Y2m3OuYI67cipWvIupNM=; b=d7aar 3chNZ7xdcEfyFNOLlYM1UKD4N3+y/kiKslG5/SIk0p0wMSnZ9/zI0JjZdkCEbkoy p42PyfilakaNQrZuvF8v3aF0jhZmrKr35tbgvcKc+6sibujbVo8P40WT9YzF0AZu xQhszF4lxG9VHUTBJUyQIdHUJo8UpZD2oGgIN0= X-Sasl-enc: JNOn139W/sALRHRgtzVAqMJdyX9vLdg4lyLc5sUQ7rK3 1430598507 Received: from thinkpad-t440p (unknown [2.162.252.232]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D2E886800DE; Sat, 2 May 2015 16:28:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Tassilo Horn To: jfbu Subject: Re: bug#20473: 11.88.4; AUCTeX-version incorrect References: <87pp6l8mce.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp6kn059.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 22:28:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: (jfbu@free.fr's message of "Fri, 01 May 2015 11:50:49 +0200") Message-ID: <87sibeafmf.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 20473 Cc: 20473@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) jfbu writes: > whow that's fast, I thought I would have to wait 24 hours but I right > now I checked and indeed I could install 11.88.5 via ELPA. Yeah, I think the cron job building the packages runs at least once a day. So 24 hours would have been the worst case scenario. Bye, Tassilo From unknown Sat Sep 06 02:33:01 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator